Sweet Pete

I think you mean losing a sneeze. Loosing a sneeze is great.

That was the name, aye.

Dateline.

Folk who go on about their cars. Not the headlight fella above, mind. But the folk who drone on about their motor as if it's the most interesting topic of conversation going. "I've got a G plate Zadoo Chancerina. It's a 1.53789. I've put a sport kit on it, lowered the frame, added Taurus shocks, Westlife tyres and 49 inch chrome Panther wheels. Before that I had a..." I. Did. Not. Ask. I. Do. Not. Care.

Only actually the one, but thanks. G_Man1985, you deserve to live in / around Dundee (I assume). This is not something that I would say of most folk.

It's all very Daily Sport meets Brass Eye. "Paedo left with egg on face".

I see we're playing the game so beloved of teenagers everywhere where we name a town that we don't come from and, though we know nothing about it, because we don't live there we say it's shite. Shandon Par, you deserve to live in Edinburgh. That is not something I would say of most folk.

I see. I bow to your superior knowledge of paedo groups.

He's right enough, this "trigger" / "triggered" patter people use on the internet now is chronic.

Congratulations on not being dead yet.

Still half your age.

Tell me about it. I've covered up all the mirrors in my house.

I'm with Danger, your house is depressing to look at.

Are these going to be able to be tried as cases by the PF for example? If not, then all sorts of questions of motive (of the youtuber), legitimacy etc arise. If, of coyrse, they are actually building legitimate cases against sex offenders and handing them over to the authorities for them to press charges then, of course, I'm all for it. But my head says that's not what's happening here.

On the whole, yes, but that's assuming that things like due process, evidence gathering, adherence to law, innocence until proven guilt etc are being adhered to. Otherwise it's a dangerous spiral of naming and potentially damaging the lives of people who may or may not be innocent. The whole thing is very strange.

Almost certainly. Which is daft, because if you are up to something untoward, trying to avoid attention isn't working if you're putting photos of yourself citizens arresting nonces on the internet.

I'll be honest, the whole thing makes me uncomfortable. Also, what do they describe themselves as to folk when asked what they do? Because starting any job title with the word "paedo" isn't great tbh.

As a fellow home worker, I'm slightly jealous of your fireplace location. I've got an office in my gaff, but it's shared between my office and a walk in wardrobe type thing, so it's fairly crowded and I sit in this small room with my laptop, my desk and computer chair and share space with a chest of drawers and clothes rails. It is not glamorous. And it would not look picturesque in a photograph. You have bested me once again, KnightswoodBear.

That's just the withdrawal talking, wee fella.

That sounds like a lot to be having in one sitting and claiming to be not overly affected by it. However, I won't take issue with it, nor do I with Throbber's lifestyle, as it's one I can relate to so it'd be hypocritical to critiscise someone for it.

Shaggy hasn't had his lunchtime bong hit I see.

For all I started this thread, I do still have a pint now and then as it goes.

And that's just to get them by til the smack is delivered.

I disagree.

There's around 2.5 units roughly in a can. 15 cans gives you 37.5 units, plus the bottle of wine is 10 units, giving a total for his three days of between 40 and 50 units of alcohol. The recommended weekly allowance for men is 14.