Jump to content

Shuggie_Murray7

Gold Members
  • Posts

    7,253
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Shuggie_Murray7

  1. 4 hours ago, Markymark1874 said:

    Guest (Rangers fan) talking about the Large Hadron Collider on Sunday’s show and uses the word “mass” in context. Cue Tam Cowan wading in to make a “joke” about a Rangers fan using the word “mass” on a Sunday….. chuckles all round 😞

     

    Just cut this absolute embarrassing pish out. I’ve said it before, both presenters will say that they are anti sectarian but continue to go for the very cheap laughs like this every single time. Why even reference this. 

    So so cringeworthy - and another reason to suggest that this show is of its time and should be binned.

    I'd watch it if I was you, Tam will have this clipped and on his Insta story by teatime.

  2. https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/sir-alex-ferguson-condemns-rangers-30929727

    Where to even start with this pish. f**k me.

    "And the former Rangers striker is utterly convinced that was the wrong call as he believes both the product on the pitch and attendances in the stands suffered. "

    We won the League Cup and our attendances barely changed during Sevco's ascent up the gingy bottle leagues. Can't say, as a St Mirren fan, that I gave a single f**k that Rangers were not in the top flight.

  3. So Kuss is losing red tomorrow, eh? No way Vingegaard and Roglic don’t attack him.

    No idea what’s going on. I get that it’s bine racing, but you’d be fuming to be leading the race, your team has an absolute stranglehold on the GC, you’re racing your third grand tour of the season and have helped the other 2 win those GTs. And now we’re in the final week of racing and your own teammates are the ones attacking you inside the last 5k.

  4. 2 hours ago, Shuggie_Murray7 said:

    The fun and excitemet has been sucked right out of this Vuelta by Jumbo.

    The only interesting remaning point will be which of their 3 GC leaders do they give the win to? Do they just let Kuss stick to the wheels all the way to Madrid? Or do they let Roglic have a pop?

    That aside, there's not much else to get excited by, other than L'Angliru tomorrow.

    Of course, they go ahead and have the three Jumbo guys actually attacking each other. That's how little a threat they view the rest of the field.

  5. 1 minute ago, Salvo Montalbano said:

    Surely if Kuss is capable they let him win it? Maiden GT victory, gives him a bit more status in that team (which already has 2 multiple GT winners and Wout van Aert!) and it means they'll be able to have a fantastic photoshoot for the sponsors with their three winners each wearing their winners Jersey. A 'shame' for them van Aert didn't win the road race in Glasgow or they could have had a clean sweep, more or less.

    Can't have happened before, a single team winning all three GT in the same year, surely? Sky held all three with Froome obviously but across 2 years, and I can't remember any team managing to win all three in a season, with one, two or three riders? 

    I can't recall a single team ever winning all 3 GTs with 3 different riders in the same season.

  6. The fun and excitemet has been sucked right out of this Vuelta by Jumbo.

    The only interesting remaning point will be which of their 3 GC leaders do they give the win to? Do they just let Kuss stick to the wheels all the way to Madrid? Or do they let Roglic have a pop?

    That aside, there's not much else to get excited by, other than L'Angliru tomorrow.

  7. 7 minutes ago, The Golden God said:


    He says no Celtic player complains, when Lagerbielke clearly does in the same shot, then from another angle you see O’Riley asking for a foul straight away and in the Sky commentary Crocker says that the players were surrounding ref right after the goal…

    You then have a bizarre scenario where Charlie Mulgrew - who thought it was a foul - tying himself up in knots trying to lend some credence to McCann's batshit take on the incident.

    Mulgrew actually said that it was a free kick, but if you take the same scenario and move it into the Celtic box then it's a penalty to Rangers. No Charlie, it's not.

    Having now watched it 3 times and tried to get my head around the points they were making - I still have no fucking idea what they are talking about.

  8. I've had to rewind twice now to see what the f**k Neil McCann is actually talking about for the Rangers disallowed goal.

    He's what he thinks a smart person sounds like. In his head, he thinks he's making a profound observation about football.

    However, because you don't agree with the laws of the game does not mean that those laws should be ignored mate. It was a trip and a clear foul and a free kick to Celtic.

    He then tried to back up his point, by saying he doesn't agree with the handball rule either so that's why it shouldn't have stood.

    He is paid to talk about football.

    He's a slavering mess. Fucking hell.

  9. Can’t make our game today so tuned in.

    The chat is about how clubs should definitely be disclosing transfer fees to fans. According to Willie Miller, clubs are “duty bound” to be “transparent” with fans.

    Jesus christ.

    No club on earth would openly talk about transfer fees or publicise how much cash they have to spend. That’d be fucking moronic. A bit like this entire chat.

    f**k me.

  10. It'd be hard to have a pop at SR for jumping if Hibs did come in. Chucking an extra 20/25/30k a year at anyone would be enough to tempt them and I wouldn't blame him in the slightest. He will know, he's only a few injuries and bad results away from all the hype around him disappearing - so you have to make hay while the sun shines.

    I really do hope we can hold on to him. But if Hibs come calling and he does go then best of luck to him. It's been some brilliant football and results to watch.

    That said, f**k Hibs.

  11.  

    13 minutes ago, DA Baracus said:

    I heard that the Young Bucks made CM Punk assault Jack Perry over an innocuous comment.

    I also heard that the Young Bucks made CM Punk make comments about Hangman after Collision went off air.

    I also heard that the Young Bucks and Hangman Page have made loads of comments online and references in promos about CM Punk and haven't actually distanced themselves from him and the situation.

    Reports have Jungle Boy initially assaulting Punk.

    Hangman commented first.

    They do it via Meltzer and Alvarez.

    Next.

  12. 1 minute ago, FairWeatherFan said:

    It also came from a place of concern over Colt Cabana being punted into uncertainty and job insecurity. Which might not have been Punk, but looks to have been Tony Khan doing some preventative work to keep Punk happy. Since here we are now with Punk on Collision Island using his influence to ban people from the show.

    Who do you think pushed the narrative that Punk emptied Cabana to Meltzer and Alvarez?

    Tony Khan admitted that it had nothing to do with Punk, it was his call. Yet Hangman and the Bucks were ever so eager to push that this was all down to Punk. Surely, as EVPs, they knew fine well that it wasn't. Wouldn't you agree?

    In all honesty, I'm sick and tired of it all over shadowing the actual wrestling shows.

    But for the fans of the Bucks and AEW, there can be no convincing them - to them, Punk is the devil.

    Reality suggests that they're all arseholes - with the Bucks crew being marginally bigger arseholes.

  13. Just now, Lukovic said:

    Placing the blame on hangman for punk having the thinnest skin imaginable is a bit far.

    So no wrestler has the right to be annoyed when someone goes into business for themself? Throughout the history of the business, that has never gone down well.

    Factor in that Hangman did this to literally the biggest draw in the history of the company - for him not to face even slight repercussion is just weird.

  14. Just now, forameus said:

    Hangman seems to just want to forget it all and stay quiet.  

    So would I, if I was the one who kickstarted it all.

    Mental that he has come out of this relatively scot free after beig the one to light the blue touch paper in the first place.

  15. 10 minutes ago, forameus said:

    Aye, but...Punk is an arsehole though.  I don't think you need to be a Bucks fan (which I'm definitely not) to realise that.

    I'm in no way a Punk fan. I think he's a self-righteous arsehole.

    However, it's apparent that there's an agenda - being driven by the Bucks and their contingent, including Meltzer and Alvarez - to somehow get rid of Punk.

    If you can't see that they are trying their level best to actively push him out then I don't know what to tell you.

    In all honestly, all sides come across as childish arseholes.

    But this is 100% being driven by that Bucks clique.

  16. Just now, DunbartonshireRed said:

    That's the type of player we are missing though. We've got Clarkson to do all the creating etc. Just need somebody that can put themselves about a bit. We haven't replaced Ramadani and I personally think Baccus is an upgrade on Ramadani. I think we'll have to go to around the £500k-£600k mark though to get him.

    If we get £500k for Baccus that'd be some piece of business.

    FWIW I think he'd do a job for Aberdeen. From what we saw at the weekend, he'd walk in to the centre of that midfield.

  17. I'd really prefer Baccus to stay.

    That said, with O'Hara, CBM, Kiltie, Gogic and Flynn, it wouldn't be the big loss that O'Hara or Strain would be IMO.

    If the Aberdeen offer is decent, I wouldn't be overly bothered if we accepted it.

    With all that in mind - f**k ABERDEEN WE SHOULD NEVER EVER EVER BE SELLING PLAYERS TO RIVALS ETC ETC ETC.

×
×
  • Create New...