-
Posts
1,205 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by MarreZ
-
I didnt actually think of this before, but Duff and Phelps have played an absolute blinder for themselves. We all know the CVA has been doomed to failure from the start, their fees wrack up, but there is not the required money to pay them. They keep hold of the players at the time of administration, but agree a reduction in what they can go for, knowing that they would be knocked down in price in any case, but you trigger a release price that lets them go, which is probably a fair market value for these guys. Knowing the cva will fail, player transfer fees are excluded from the CVA and the extra 5 or 6 million they will get in from letting these guys go means their fee is well covered, it has never been in doubt how much the CVA would cost, I guess they knew from the outset that it was going to be well in excess of 5 or 6 million, with the money they get from Green for the newco assets, there is now just enough for them to pay their bill. Administration always ends up in the administrator and no one else getting paid,that is generally how things work, its always an amazing coincidence that administrators fees always end up very similarly to what is available.
-
Thats weird, I didnt mean to quote that one, it was another one where some guy posted about sporting integrity because we had signed Charlie Adam, saying it gave the bottom 6 an unfair advantage (despite not having him in the bottom 6) St Mirren asked Rangers for Charlie Adam on loan on two occasions .They could not afford to buy him or pay his wages but played him none the less . As their goal at the begining of the season was survival this must be seen as having an unfair advantage over the rest of the teams at the bottom six . Dundee utd were the same with Andy Webster ( as captain he lifted the scottish cup for them ) . Both teams were happy to have Rangers pay players to play for them . Sporting intergity ?
-
This has got to be someone on the windup! markybear, on 30 May 2012 - 07:31 PM, said: No matter how scathed or unscathed we enter season 2012/13, if we cancel our blanket boycott, I do think st mirren should get special treatment on this one. I will not be attending new st mirren park for RFC games next yr. I urge the rest to do likewise, the hatred for RFC was falling out of their chairman today. Theirs a saying ..... Don't bite the hand that feeds. he should take heed of that
-
Why are the secured creditors only £7500 on the sheet? "Close Leasing is a secured creditor under the administration after it provided new equipment for Ibrox kitchen upgrades in a deal Mr Whyte secured against income from the catering contract at the stadium In the report, Duff and Phelps said "indebtedness to Close Leasing Limited was approximately £1.6m, subject to accruing interest and charges" and discussions are continuing over repayment of this."
-
5.12 The SPL season has finished and as a result, the Company's trading revenue has dropped sharply. The Company must still continue to trade, and in particular it must continue to pay its players, to remain as a going concern. As such, the Company will incur the CVA Trading Costs. It is unclear at the date of this Proposal the period over which the CVA Trading Costs will be incurred and therefore a definitive figure cannot be provided at present. It is estimated that, if the loan is drawn down on or around mid July 2012, The CVA Trading Costs may be in the region of £3,000,000 ministration fees are on top of the 3m CVA trading costs out the pot, so even by a low 2.7 figure administrators costs, thats 5.7m out of the 8.5m, at the low end, and 6.5m at the high end. The current pot of creditors is 56m near enough going by the statement, which would be just under 5% at the low end as a best case scenario. (not including any potential court cases in and out). Did I read this correctly?
-
Apart from Billy Dodds claims that he never had an EBT then he had one but the tax was deducted off it, surely HMRC will investigate the last part of his statement? If Rangers were claiming tax off players for the EBT's as Dodds claimed and obviously were not paying any tax to the taxman its a huge financial scandal far bigger than the EBT's alone, and shows that Murray was doing the same as Whyte for years, taxing players and keeping it, which is worse than simple tax avoidance.
-
Well for one, you might have a point if it was the original case, but its an appeal, so its unlikely anything will come up to change that ruling. Would it change much anyway if the big tax case went Rangers way? There is still a whole lot of debt and a whole lot of contract issues remaining even without the big tax case.