Jump to content

sonsanorak

Gold Members
  • Posts

    1,467
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sonsanorak

  1. I thought we were dominated in nearly every position today.  It looked like a team of street wise experienced guys against some newbies and that shouldn't be the case when you look at our squad.

    McKee seemed to be playing holding midfield which didnt suit how busy the midfield was or offer the defence much protection.  However, he's been out for a while and is a few weeks behind the rest of them in terms of fitness.  

    Wallace looked decent but was often asked to try and win a crappy long ball against a centre back.

    I dont normally go to these preseason cup games, they're not really anything other than exercises in improving fitness and teamwork.

    Two positives; Lynas looks like he'll make tackles all day and Long looked decent.

  2. It was 4-4-2 throughout, but bucky and mcniff were often really far apart. 

    New players; lynas, love and byrne look promising.

    Trilaists; the redheaded midfielder (findlay gray?) was in amongst it, but was often a half second behind the play.  No other caught the eye.

    Braves; very technical and content with a short fast passing game, a few of their players looked more than comfortable in the game and I really liked their left back.

  3. 7 hours ago, squeezebox-son said:

    With a bit of luck, perhaps we are looking to offload him.

     

    I noticed Frank's interview had him saying, "There will also be a bit of movement before the transfer window closes, but we are delighted with what we have to date."

    Which in the context, read to me that we are still trying to negotiate with players who are in the squad. Although, I doubt Buchanan would be the one (one of the ones) we will look to move on.

    I'm surprised that there hasnt been departures from the group on 2y deals.  Paton might be the only one who left for something better, but I kind of imagined that some of them wouldn't have fancied playing in the 2nd.

  4. 10 hours ago, FifeSons said:

    Goals 1 and 4 in 

    Stanger has been pretty decent for us, but was definitely out of sorts on Tuesday.   If he was going to make a mistake, and who doesnt, that wasnt the best time for it.

    I think we've got a chance tomorrow, in hindsight I think we played really well but were undone by the first 2 freaky goals.  We're capable of winning the game and if we can avoid throwing them in at the other end, the tie could be close.

  5. Out coached.  I'm pretty sure we played exactly the way EC wanted us to.

    That said we made plenty of half chances and some terrible mistakes that were punished.

    Stanger has been pretty solid in general but his mistake for the first set the tone.  But before that we'd seen signs that our defence was unnerved by the long ball and goal kicks.  EC seemed to have 4 men up, man for man against our defence for every goal kick and we were a little fortunate at one point when the 2 CBs went for the same ball and never got it.

    I dont see us turning this around. 

  6. I think the only issue that might stop Faz fielding the same starting 11 for the 3rd week in a row would be Carsys knock from last saturday.  If he's fit, expect the same, if not I hope he brings in Wilson or McKee instead of moving Carlo into Cm.

    Looking forward to it today, get right in about it early.

  7. Faz said on Tuesday that our good performance on Saturday was tied to having our best players back and that he'd like to have a settled team.  In which case expect the same as last week.

    Only one of that lot I might change would be Duthie, perhaps for Wilson or Wylde.

     

  8. 6 hours ago, Frank Quitely said:

    You do realise that Peterhead have already beaten us three times this season ?

    Aye, but I was looking at the recent games.  If we'd won our recent head to heads against they 2 we'd have 32 points, peterhead 25 and east fife 20.  Arguably we'd be feeling safe.

  9. It's going to be tight I think; peterhead have 28 points and are to play us and east fife, 6 points from last 33.

    Us, 26 points and 8 points from 33, peterhead at ours in a  few weeks.

    EF; 23 points and have taken 10 points from 33.

    How different it would have been if we'd not lost to EF and Peterhead.

  10. I dont think a change is coming, so I guess theres nothing else to do but try and support the players.

    I thought the boy Stanger done ok at left back on Saturday.  But keeping Boyle and Muir on the bench is a perfect example of Fazz' signing strategy, man management and support to the younger kids.  Never mind that he's dragged Lynch out of hibernation and thrown him in the 11, then subbed him and then subbed the right back again.

    He might be a nice guy, he might talk a good game, but we've got to be better.  He was lucky in January I think when on a honking run of form he signed Wylde and Josh before a win and 2 draws.   Since then it's all gone wrong again and we've seen changes in shape, horrible tactics, a terrible lack of squad depth and frustration from the players.

    Hopefully he flukes 1 or 2 wins again 

  11. Theres not an issue with 31 individual errors as such, it's the mentality and how you react to that mistake.

    His response this far has been to burn that player and sign another, now he cant and he's left looking at the bench wondering who's minded to knock their pan in or be a match winner for him and the club, answer is no one.  That lies with his management throughout the season.

  12. 2nd bottom in the league and we play out a complete non event.  Toothless and accident prone are not a good combination.  

    I'd accept that Faz was limited by suspension and Covid today, but to field a team with 7 defenders and therefore minimal attacking threat is ridiculous.  Falkirk are unsettled yet we didnt try and get in about them.

    He's got to go and give someone else the chance to help these players turn it around, if he was capable of that we wouldn't be in this position.

×
×
  • Create New...