youngsy

^^^^^^ *** lover. Doesn't like the ****** type.

You're a celtic fan, in that respect you're a h_ _ as far as i'm concerned. No argument, that's always been the correct way.

Er, yes you did but i won't prolong this trivial point, yours, Mick Fleetwood.

Upset, why would i be upset. More likely to be laughing at someone putting up such a post in the first place. As for DK, i don't believe anything related to Ibrox until i see it's 100% confirmed and genuine. Only rumours i listen to is Fleetwood Macs.

Fucking hell, has Phil still got you as his PR man?

Chalk it up as you being a tosspot for posting it in the first place.

Is your taxi off the road, shull

Made me laugh like f**k that did, cunto

And yet you take money from the church in your employment as a church cleaner.

In your opinion that is, which tbh means absolutely nothing to myself. As for the "we", try not to be so pedantic, i'll phrase that another way just to please you, ' Scotland has East Europeans who in all probability the majority of them will return to their own countries to live permanently so therefore as far as i'm concerned have no right to vote on this issue as they are not Scots born and have no emotional or family ties to the country'. if you asked the many Scots living in other parts of the UK you would get a very large majority stating that there is a very valid point in what i said.

He's putting across his opinion and tbh as a Scot living in England who hasn't got a vote in this i have to say there is a valid point that Scots born people living in other parts of the UK are being denied the chance to have a say in the future of their country,whether they still reside there or not. We have East Europeans who are living in Scotland that have no links whatsoever to the country and in all likelihood will return to their home country at some point in time and yet they will have a vote to determine the future of a country that they have no emotional or family ties to in any way. That is fundamentally wrong.

^^^^^^^^Celtic supporting thug threatens placid Rangers supporting family man.

If there's anything in that i'll drive him to London myself.

So it's classed as an elite stadium by UEFA. Thanks for clarifying. http://www.worldstadiumdatabase.com/list-of-uefa-category-4-stadiums.htm

You're having a go at Tedi and myself over this, both of us have stated the stadium is a UEFA Category 4 on the elite list of stadia, show different if you can. Maybe you should go on the World Stadium Database, you see that both Hampden and Ibrox are on the UEFA Category 4 along with another 25 stadia. Certainly Ibrox needs work done on it but it's still a Category 4 UEFA stadium.

If you can show from any source that the stadium is not on the UEFA elite stadium listing then please show. As it stands you've been shown two sources stating otherwise so over to you on that now.

http://economicsfc.wordpress.com/2013//03/12/51/ Maybe that will tell you more, dated March 2013

Just to clarify, is that his bald patch you're speaking of?

Aye, just a shame we haven't got women supporters of the calibre of Elaine C. Smith or Susan Boyle. Suppose we'll just have to put up with looking at Amy MacDonald.

We've got enough tits in the team as it is.

They were presented with a tax bill which they disputed, perfectly within their right to do so. The disputed tax bill was found in favour of the PLC at the FTT, HMRC appealed to the UTT, that appeal was thrown out in favour of the PLC. The PLC don't have to fight those decisions, that only applies to the losers in both decisions, that happens to be HMRC. I have to say though, as a UK taxpayer i'm very perturbed that HMRC are pursuing a case which has went against them twice to a very substantial cost to the British public. As i'm sure you are yourself.

Spin it!! Both tribunals upheld for the PLC, where is the spin? I would suggest that it is yourself that is trying to spin it, or did we all receive the wrong result from the FTT, 2-1 in favour of the PLC, the UTT upheld for the PLC after HMRC took it to the UTT, that's the fact of the matter, no spin just the fact. Now that HMRC are considering a further appeal i would think that they are fighting both the outcome of the FTT and the UTT.

HMRC are fighting it, not the PLC. After all both the FTT and UTT were found in favour of the PLC.

It may be all shiny but it will always be the piggery to me.