Sorry, I disagree with you here. I certainly don’t think anyone is “accepting mediocrity”, the impression I get from the games, highlights and reactions (posts etc) is that there’s a fair bit of frustration at our form, given the squad Crawford and Shields have assembled. I also think there’s (still) a fair bit of optimism about this squad; the players we signed in the summer seemed well thought out and carefully considered, as opposed to the usual carousel signings. For that reason, the players and/or management have been shown a bit more patience than previous seasons. For me, that’s certainly where the frustration (and perhaps confusion?) comes from - Crawford seems to have signed all the right players, with a good blend and balance of skills and qualities, but he’s been very poor at actually setting them up well. My instinct now is that Crawford has the potential to be a great coach, but he needs a manager above him to be setting them up and motivating them better. As for the club lacking ambition, I don’t see how that could be the case. As DA Baracus said, it looks like the board really backed Crawford by letting him build his own squad, spending a good few quid in the process where we wouldn’t normally. It looks like the club have a more long term plan for aiming for promotion, whereas it’s been the immediate aim every season since we came back up, and it hasn’t worked yet, in fact we actually regressed. Aiming for a solid, mid table finish this season and looking at playoffs or promotion in the following season or two doesn’t, in my opinion, show a lack of ambition. The gist of it is that Crawford is out of his depth as a manager, but clearly has an eye for a decent, promising player and I’d like to see SC and GS work with a more experienced manager. I doubt it, but whether or not the budget would allow for those two AND a manager is another question.