GreenockRover

...and still bumping his gums about the decision........ hilarious Says he's just going to troll arseholes now. Nothing new there really. Benny'll be delighted of course. Might be a wee delay in the trolling until they wipe the semen off their screens after todays performance though....

Chuckie hasn't lost his ability to pot stir has he?

Gotta be patient Dave. Takes a while to con people into spunking their own personal fortune on The Rangers' wet dreams of reflective glory. "Looking into the books and checking contracts" is merely corporate waffle for "trying to come up with a viable plan that won't make our public chest beating and bluffery look like the bullshit it really was" Buying time while they figure out what the actual f**k they do now they have the keys to the money pit at last.

This then....This now......This forever..

...and is the entire, unequivocal reason they find themselves in the utterly ridiculous position they have been since February 2012. And.....Could do so again without a change in their supremacy addicted psyche...

Yup. Fun while it lasted though. No wonder they get done over so easily...

Are you KIDDING ! :lol: Not expecting or wanting one to be honest. More than content to have him reaffirm (yet again)his position as P&B's resident fool. Truly the jesters' jester. Keep the trophy Benny, you've earned it.

Got that going on here too. The shop isn't closing. It's flogging of the USC stuff. But, as a marketing tool, puting up that type of signage fairly drives the footfall up.... B)

I tried guys.... I really tried.

Yes yes Benny..... whatever you say. Now, eat your tea.

Worked for Rangers ....oh wait. The article has been corrected. You didn't see the incorrect version, ergo you believe it never existed despite the fact that many others did. Watching you try to be a smartass about it is funny... Carry on

Clearly it's been corrected as it read 2011 when I copied the link - hence Weirdcals' response as he obviously saw the incorrect version. Once again the village idiot is late to the starting gate and wonders why everyone has left him standing. Again !

ladies and gents... we have a winner. Unsurprisingly not Benny

Oh dear STV.... Never gonna get off the list with this type of accuracy.. http://news.stv.tv/west-central/314564-dave-king-seeks-court-permission-to-be-appointed-as-director-of-rangers/

Voluntary delisting (albeit from a regulation breach by way of no NOMAD) on AIM is highly likely IMO. Glib & Shameless has mentioned this as something he considers of "little consequence to him or the club". (Note careful use of the word CLUB). He expands on this by chucking in: "In a perfect world my personal preference would be not to be listed..." The tight (and costly) regulatory environment of the Markets clearly grates heavily against Kings' philosophy of using his(?) and more importantly, other peoples' money to persue some ego driven trip to become... well, quite, become WHAT exactly? The saviour of a scottish football club he (and a large number of it's supporter base) thinks should ALWAYS be the best ? Really Dave ? Really ? It's a sporting competition Dave, not a reflective statement of worth....... ah. The acute similarities between him and David Murray lead me to ask if they were ever seen in the same room at the same time, such is their fiscal symbiocity. The main difference being that, this time, there are NO friendly contacts within the now disgraced banks willing to lend a shell company ludricous amounts of cash that briefly glances off it's books before heading into the pockets of expensive marquee, trophy and title winning show ponies for the SPFL. So, if delisting occurs, Dave not only has to reach deep into his own (or his kids') pockets, he also has to convince private "investors" ( that word!) to stump up the kind of cash it takes to realise his personal remeniscenses of the "Rangers I grew up with...". Are there, I wonder, enough business owning individuals with such a strong personal leaning towards all things "Rangers" that they would be prepared to ante up the not insignificant amounts required to have Scottish Football dragged back to the duplicitous duopoly it used to be ? What would be their incentive ? Financial returns ? Business related tie ins? "The good of the club" ? Recognition amongst their folk ? And.... the BIG question... How much and how often ?? It worked for a while under David Murray and the bankers. Different field now.......

http://www.careershifters.org/

Scenario: A man falls in the street and sprains his ankle. A car runs him over, causing severe injuries. He is transferred into an ambulance. On the way to hospital it crashes. He is the only survivor (just). The emergency services get him to hospital. A plane crashes onto it - his injuries are now critical. The operation to save him is a success. He then finds out that the blood used in the op is infected with HIV. It's all Celtics' fault.

Probably went back to Sooth Efrika to dig up copious wads of cash from out on the veldt to send to the glorious and loyal playing and coaching staff. It'll need *cleaned* of course

QUICK ! Get the red cards out (again)

I'm organising a "Red card to Genisism" display. Bound to work... Atheists Then, Atheists Now, Atheists for the Eternity

We are Atheists Super Atheists No one made us We don't care

Road To Nowhere........ resonance. Mind you Byrne is a thin guy in a fat boys' suit.... The Mullet...well, just look..

That's fat Sallys' suit is it not ?

Fair point Staggie. Not my intention to appear sexist at all. Guess it's all down to interpretation, however, in this day and age I'm prepared to also concede that there will indeed be female supporters dragging their hubby's to matches as much as the other way around. I'll even go further and suggest that there will, probably, even be some gay/lesbian fans dragging their partners along too. Nowt wrong with that. False or enforced display of unity was my point in that post you understand. Regardless of who brought who.

It's simply further evidence, not that it's needed, that they see themselves as "an institution" more than a football club. Dragging along the other half to "show unity and support of this great club". This type of psychosis is what motivates the mouth breathers and moon howlers amongst them to come out with their ridiculous banners and statements. Being made to sit through a 1-1 draw with the leagues' bottom club, watching football mercenaries (really shit ones at that) robbing the piggy bank of the last of its coppers and then looking across to the (delapidated) stands, knowing that the utter roasters waving politically centric banners and believing the statements they make (at a sports ground) are your principle revenue stream. Forever. No wonder they look like someone's vomited down their sash. They don't seem to realise it's their own vomit.