GreenockRover

You know, if it wasn't for the likes of our own berrz on here, you would think The Rangers support was littered with Unionist supremacist type neanderthals. Lucky we've been told it isn't....

VACANCY Non-Executive Director (Fans Representative) You will be able to demonstrate below average intelligence (IQ of 15 or less preferred but not essential) and the ability to connect with our 500 million strong fanbase through the knowledge of "an approved song/chant book". Experience of backing any and all directors arriving at the Club/Company is also desirable. Only candidates that have zero internet presence need apply. No salary is offered with this highly prestigious position but frequent pats on the head from fellow directors can be expected for the right candidate. If your measurements are the same as the fud we recently unloaded then an interview is a certainty. Applications should be signed by your carer (or at least your mum or dad - if they still live with you.

Those Internet bampots kicking ra gers when they're down..... tsk tsk..

Grahams' efforts in rounding up the flock for King to return (to the place he was complicit in destroying in the first instance) was indeed laudable. However, the briefest look into the blokes' history shows that his motivations to such efforts are spawned from reasons far removed from the intended impression of altruistic fervour given by some in the Ibrox fraternity and our resident apologists on here. That one begets the other is equally unsurprising in all honesty. The rush to appoint some fans rep to the board reeks of platitudinal hair ruffling from the LyingKing towards the most identifiable, if wholly unsuitable, fans mouthpiece. It was always going to backfire. King is effectively the shepherd and Graham the dog. However the dog doing the most barking is not always the best dog for the job. Get him to a vet. One way visit.

Chris Graham getting it already... Oh the LOLS

Chris Graham....fans rep on board.... (not enough smilies on the planet)

K Only one Easedale? Hmmmm.Wonder if there are "negotiations" being conducted. ? More fun to come maybe... ETA: James is the one with the ownership of the singular family brain cell... May indeed be Mr Glib and Shameless' turn to put up or shut up ? You've heard this before berrz but needs saying.... Wallets OOT!!... ETA 2: Welcoming back people who were responsible for the first liquidation..... Only Rangers

F'kin priceless Tedric

Think you must be confused.... was it not Ricksen ? (selective outrage.....A berrz favourite flavour of hypocrisy)

^^^^^^^ Lazy bassa....

As I remember it... Initial loan (MAH) - £3m Secondary Loan (SPD) - £10m in two seperate tranches of £5m, of which, £3m was, allegedly, used to repay (MAH) Loan. The second £5m tranch to be drawn down only with the express consent of Llambias and Co. IF this secondary tranch has hit the books (?) then the 'loans' liability stands at £10m, if not, £5m. Certinly not a massive bill to pay off but it bought Ashley a very nice slice of the revenue streams.

has Kinky-esque overtones tbh...

Yes. Yes he is.... Sectarian hatred is what keeps the artificially large supports coming at these 'institutions'.

Getting exciting for the King disciples..... http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/305651-who-owns-rangers-our-detailed-breakdown-of-the-shareholders-at-ibrox/ I noticed with some irony that HSBC are involved - f**k me, nothing changes

That is gonna upset a certain (moronic) poster. Normally his weapon of choice around here... Oh.....hiya Bennett!

Loved the Gascoigne reference too.... Most Ragers fans are really too stupid to engage in written warfare - far better pugalists - requires far less grey matter. Edit shpelling DOH!

How is the projected voting going Tedi ? Are the unknowns in the position of power ? Is it back to spending like there's no tomorrow soon ? Post up the Hope / Dope piccie from Dingbat Dingwall on FF will ya ? - for the giggles

6.00am on any Sunday morning maybe ?

Almost makes me wish I'd followed through on my original share bid. Almost....

Apparently not... Top trolling right there...

Spoof account...?

Anyone else get the feeling ra bears are conducting this campaign of derailing a London based EGM to try and force it back to Ibrox ? Seems....."convenient" B)

Don't thank me HTH

Just helping you out with a little clarification there... Carry on living the convenient truth

Oh Tedi, The whole idea of whether the "attack" happened or not was NOT my original point. You do see that ? Don't you ? My point to you, based on your *ahem* "theory" of trying to get the EGM postponed, was that surely the better story would actually be your proposed theory as opposed to the alleged attack ? To be fair, I also side tracked slightly by alerting you to the value of being clear in the difference between inferred fact and opinion. Merely trying to help. Mea culpa. I understand your defensiveness over any criticism aimed at your posts, but do try and read the original post you are replying to a little more carefully before diving in ? For the record, on the subject discussed, the lack of a police report does not mean something never took place. It means it wasn't reported to the police. Having seen representatives of ra peepul in action before, it is quite possible it did happen. Llambias is both ugly and smart enough to be able to handle the situation if it was verbals but, equally, understands full well, the idea that it would NOT be a valid reason to attempt to postpone the meeting. As you also said, similarities of 2011 are striking. You will of course be worried that it changed nothing. Any news on the new location yet btw?