Doctor Manhattan

What's the difference between this game and the eye-bleeding fare served up at Fir Park yesterday? About £2bn.

You're right, and I would like to offer my apologies to anyone who was offended by what was merely a bit of light hearted banter designed to take our minds off the eye-bleeding fare served up at Fir Park today.

You're taking this WAY too seriously. Any dog-eating slur was aimed at Paisley, although I'm heartened you took the time to Google "Yulin".

You were saying?

You sure you don't mean "a Yulin vibe"?

See, that's something I hadn't thought of. It would still be pretty stupid, even if accidental, but still infinitely better than explicitly asking "Would you like yours with or without?"

I bought two small 99's not long back from a van in Luss, and in came to £12.

A laudable aim. Shame, though, I found it a nice distraction from the tedium of Wrexham v Mansfield. Toodle pipski.

I think it's 7 years, but it was more a question about the principle than the practice. If I won a million on the lottery, what's the difference between me gifting it to my kids now (assuming I don't die soon afterwards) as opposed to waiting until I die and seeing 40% of it disappear in IHT? Questions about social equity, while obviously relatively inseparable, weren't uppermost in my mind when I posed the original question.

This argument seems to imply that not only should government/society/whoever dictate what happens to your money after you die, they can also proscribe what you can do with it at any time while you're still alive. Where's the line to be drawn between buying your kids an ice cream and buying them a house? (Or at least helping out with the deposit?) The distribution of wealth (both absolute and relative) is a subject that long predates communism, and maybe even capitalism itself. Did you ever read Aristophanes' "Plutus"?

For those in a position to do so (not me, for the avoidance of doubt) what's the difference between helping your kids while you're alive, as opposed to doing so after you're dead? Surely all that a 100% inheritance tax would accomplish would be to skew things towards the first option.

Without carrying out any actual analysis, it feels as though almost every single guest Jools Holland has ever had on his show qualifies. Also, Jools Holland himself. If he was any further up himself he could lick his own tonsils.

Who gives the slightest shite about Northern Ireland? Oh, right...

No. Just...no.

Phew, that's not a holiday, that's an ultramarathon! Perhaps not coincidentally you'll be there for the start of the peak whale shark season, and very handily positioned for Isla Mujeres and Isla Contoi. Enjoy!!

Don't miss Chichen Itza. Dive the cenotes if you can. And don't drink TOO many tamarind margaritas, they're highly addictive. (Ask me how I know )

Nobody hates us, we don't care.

Aye, there's only one stat that really counts. 1-1 it is.

I get what youo mean, but the point, such as it was, was that you don't score 4 with just 2 shots on target. xG might say 6-6, if you believe in such things, but there has to be a correction applied for the Airdrie factor.

Perhaps because...

Too right, it's a cumulative thing - the more such c***s you encounter over the years, the worse it gets. If they made sidewinder missiles available as a factory-fitted option, I would be first in the queue.

Peter Knowles. "God's footballer hears the voices of angels above the choir at Molineux"...

As it happens I'm a nuclear scientist, not a medical doctor.

As recently as Monday they were adamant she'd be back at work after Easter. (I.e. next week!) Lying, incompetent chunts.