Burnieman

You're blaming the Scottish Govt? Wow, that's some take on it.

Even if any of that is remotely true, then why would anonymous opinion on one forum be worth anymore than the other? It's just opinion on the internet. Desperate posturing. The fact is the HL/LL line remains in place, and until it is removed or reformed, then it's probably unlikely that the EoS would accept members from north of it (just an opinion). As has been widely reported, applications have been turned down in the past. Therefore talk of Tayside clubs falling into the HL pyramid area and how that may be accommodated isn't "clueless" in the real world. As it stands, if they want to enter the Pyramid they have to look north, not south.

Baldrick more like [emoji23]

Talk about being a drama queen [emoji85]

Players are Glasgow based hence their Benburb base. Makes sense to transfer to the West rather than continue in the East.

Give it a rest you complete trolling fantasist loonball. Reach out for some help.

Do the teams in the east want to travel through to Glasgow on a Friday night? A bit of common sense is required here.

The application deadline is 15th June isn't it?

Clearly it wasn't and only a troll looking for a reaction or a halfwit believes that, take your pick.

Yer patter is as mince as it has always been. Complete halfwit.

In what way pish?

[emoji23] you really are a trolling moron.

Tutankhamen TheBairns57 Cherrywhite Holstein Caliy Curzonmid Traffordab Weemurray25 Densky Pacers theriversiders Kroll pausa alzar7 The rocket NCAC

UEFA zoom meetings with national associations on 17th and 18th so it makes sense for SFA board to be talking about this and other issues.

Tranent were chucked out last season due to a number of issues. Tynecastle and Haddington withdrew this season.

It's upto clubs what they do. We put a bucket out, some have asked £2 or £3, most are free. On the subject of a spectator barrier, this should be a minimum requirement. There were a couple of incidents this season where a physical barrier between parents and pitch would have helped. Need to try and be as professional as we can be at this level. Some venues I encountered really are unsuitable. What doesn't help either is lack of linesmen, even club linesmen to put the flag up if ball goes out. Referees did it themselves and unsurprisingly get it wrong a few times a game.

Don't forget Tutankhamen as well, that's his alter ego.

......and he's back [emoji85][emoji23]

Having just seen the SFA protocol for returning to training, you're absolutely right.

It is being voted on at the LL AGM, I cannot see that a majority of clubs will vote to move/amend the line given what has been going on, and the SPFL's complete disregard for the play-offs. Neither do I think the SPFL will do anything re entry of LL and HL clubs to the 2 cups, Brechin wont be going down, so is it really an issue the SPFL will be concerned about and causing a stooshie over at this current time. As for EoS entry for Tayside, when you have Larry fae Lochee accusing the office bearers of lying, I'm not sure there's too much goodwill floating around.

Your licence is audited every year before renewal. So in that situation, you'd lose your licence.

There was an enquiry, not a formal application because they were told they were too late, but to apply for next season. At least that is my understanding. It never went to EGM for clubs to vote on. Either way they appear to have applied for 21/22.

Kinnoul made an enquiry last season after the deadline and were told they'd need to apply for the following season, which they did. Eyemouth then withdrew late in the day before AGM and Kinnoul were offered the chance to come in this season. They accepted and the members voted them in at AGM. No idea if that is even a possibility with Livingston or not - the above statement implies that they have applied for 21/22 - depends if Bo'ness get their licence and go to the LL (almost a certainty) but at the end of the day the EoS are in control of who does or does not get admitted to their league. Nobody else. It's not the concern of the EoS if that upsets anyone or at least it shouldn't be.

Explain how it would be unethical for the EoS to admit a new applicant club if the existing members agree? I don't believe there was ever a formal application from Livingston for membership. An enquiry perhaps.

If you're going to post shite stick to Tootsy and save yourself the bother of setting up a whole load of new ID's, I mean Pacer?