forehead7 Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Wikipedia says he is under a 5 years legends contract. Vince will probably be more annoyed about him mentioning Benoit that he will be about the small man comments. It would be interesting to hear which "big men" Nash thinks should have been pushed over smaller guys since 2004. I didn't even think of either of those, I was more meaning just the content (talking about three inch dicks and pornos) while he's associated with the company. (I checked his twitter to see if his name/bio mentioned WWE but it doesn't), he only has the tweet to Jericho (calling him a mark) but not the original rant. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Kevin Nash was involved in a bigger drawing angle than those three guys combined. MVP's point was also absolutely hilarious as well. Kevin Nash might be talking utter shite, but it would be nice if someone went to him without looking like a fanny. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RB-Scotland Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Jericho's first tweet did completely tear Nash's laughable 'argument' apart with ease, though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 It was a hell of a narrow minded view of what happened though. He DIDN'T mention that when Nash left, ratings actually plummeted and that RAW when he was champ did VERY well. PPV buyrates were declining for a while and it'd have taken something very special for that to change. It did, when Nash, Hogan and Hall came together. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXHnncmn4Z4 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshmallo Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Kevin Nash is the fucking man and much of what he says there is true. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 I have continued my recent silvervision obsession and now own the following DVDs: History of Intercontinental title Stone Cold - Full story Stars of the 90's Best of RAW 93 and 94 The rock - full story Royal Rumble 92 - 95 Summerslam 88 - 94 Wrestlemania 3 - 2000 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forehead7 Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 Kevin Nash is the fucking man and much of what he says there is true. Whether he's trolling or not, using two wrestlers who died in tragic circumstances to do it isn't right and is a massive dickmove. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big River Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 Whether he's trolling or not, using two wrestlers who died in tragic circumstances to do it isn't right and is a massive dickmove. Why is it a dickmove and why does the circumstances in which both men died matter? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 It seems Nash has decided that his bit-part role in a relatively successful movie has somehow made his opinion relevant again. He hasn't contributed anything worthwhile to wrestling since 1998. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djchapsticks Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXHnncmn4Z4 I've been watching a lot of Cornette's shoot stuff recently. I could listen to the guy talking all day, he's an immensely talented speaker. And quite funny into the bargain. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 Kevin Nash is shite, and massively overrated. There, I said it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 It seems Nash has decided that his bit-part role in a relatively successful movie has somehow made his opinion relevant again. He hasn't contributed anything worthwhile to wrestling since 1998. His opinion is about as relevant as anyone else's. It doesn't matter when he was last worthwhile. The revisionist history that this stuff has brought out regarding his career is pretty funny. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forehead7 Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 Why is it a dickmove and why does the circumstances in which both men died matter? It's a dickmove because he's taking shots at dead people who can't respond themselves. Taking shots at wrestlers who died young(not really how they died, more when) is a bit harsh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 It's a dickmove because he's taking shots at dead people who can't respond themselves. Taking shots at wrestlers who died young(not really how they died, more when) is a bit harsh. He gave an opinion on a moment of wrestling that he thought was significant. That's it. You don't need those two guys to be able to respond. There's plenty of people who can have opinions on it. The LAST people who's opinions I'd take on board are the people involved given they'd obviously be biased. The fact that they're dead means f**k all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forehead7 Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 He gave an opinion on a moment of wrestling that he thought was significant. That's it. You don't need those two guys to be able to respond. There's plenty of people who can have opinions on it. The LAST people who's opinions I'd take on board are the people involved given they'd obviously be biased. The fact that they're dead means f**k all. But then he goes onto compare them to referees which is disrespectful to any wrestler. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 Ah right. I guess because they're dead they're beyond the reach of opinion then. My mistake. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshmallo Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 It seems Nash has decided that his bit-part role in a relatively successful movie has somehow made his opinion relevant again. He hasn't contributed anything worthwhile to wrestling since 1998. Nash was an integral part of the build up to WM18 with the classic Rock-Hogan match. I loved his feud with HHH which led to a phenomenal HITC at Bad Blood (2003 I think?). He made the X-Division the most interesting it's ever been with Paparazzi Productions. He had a key role in one of the hottest feuds of last year and had a great match with HHH at TLC. Kevin Nash is shite, and massively overrated. There, I said it. Kevin Nash was one third of the biggest angle in the history of professional wrestling. Unless by "shite" you mean he doesn't perform a style of wrestling akin to Jack Evans or Davey Richards, and even then he wouldn't be "overrated" because no one sees him as some great technician. But then he goes onto compare them to referees which is disrespectful to any wrestler. He says they are a similar height to the referees. They are a similar height to the referees. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 Nash was an integral part of the build up to WM18 with the classic Rock-Hogan match. I loved his feud with HHH which led to a phenomenal HITC at Bad Blood (2003 I think?). He made the X-Division the most interesting it's ever been with Paparazzi Productions. He had a key role in one of the hottest feuds of last year and had a great match with HHH at TLC. Rock vs Hogan was only about Rock and Hogan, Hall and Nash were a sideshow in 2002 and that incarnation of the NWO was quickly dumped when Hogan turned face. Triple H vs Nash is widely considered to be the worst ever HITC match and Nash and Triple H ruined the hottest angle of last Summer with their involvement. Nash was entertaining in that period in TNA, but anything that ever happens in TNA is irrelevant since nobody watches it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted August 10, 2012 Share Posted August 10, 2012 Triple H vs Nash is widely considered to be the worst ever HITC match and Nash and Triple H ruined the hottest angle of last Summer with their involvement. Triple H's involvement was actually quite good. Nash's was pretty dodgy. He was stuttering all over the shop. He was at his best when he was kicking the shit out of folk. It started really well too so I was disappointed with how it winded up going. The Ladder Match him and HHH had was a cracker though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.