Jump to content

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Bully Wee Villa said:

Yeah, and even if you're blue-ticked it doesn't mean all the people that you are aiming to promote your business to are. So you still lose out.

It'll be fine as long as you're selling jawline surgery and GHB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Melanius Mullarkay said:

This was directed at Musk btw, not Div. 

  Reveal hidden contents

He’s not racist.

 

🤣 disappointing lack of @Div going rogue comparisons on this thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really don't understand their logic - surely the big money is in adverts/onward clicks; and advertisers/content producers want as many people as possible to see and read as much as possible?

Stopping people who aren't logged in from viewing at all, and limiting what people who are can view, feels counter-productive?

Plus even if you think the big money is in subscriptions - users won't see value if traffic is down?

Edited by HibeeJibee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bully Wee Villa said:

Surely his advertisers will be seething if they go from ten million views to a few thousand every day? Can't they sue him? That'd be a laugh.

Why? They pay per view, not a flat rate, so their costs have plummeted along with the views, so they have more money to advertise elsewhere. Now, Twitter’s revenue has plummeted to…

1 hour ago, Bully Wee Villa said:

I don't understand what this means.

Apparently in reconfiguring Twitter’s interfaces and establishing limits, while in a crash program to pull all data from Google’s servers (that they don’t want to pay for anymore), they established a condition where their own interface ends up in a loop, constantly trying to connect and get new data that doesn’t exist, thereby dragging the whole system down in some sort of mad, self-inflicted, DDOS attack.

A DDOS attack is a “Distributed Denial Of Service”, or when an attacker commands a huge number of devices or computers to contact the context to the targeted computer(s) and bombard them with requests at a frequency that exceeds their ability to respond, thereby knocking the system offline.

Edited by TxRover
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, HibeeJibee said:

Really don't understand their logic - surely the big money is in adverts/onward clicks; and advertisers/content producers want as many people as possible to see and read as much as possible?

Stopping people who aren't logged in from viewing at all, and limiting what people who are can view, feels counter-productive?

Plus even if you think the big money is in subscriptions - users won't see value if traffic is down?

 

IMG_5931.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, guinness said:

Could it be a ploy to get it trending more? It's where I get my local news from but not anymore. Just deleted it because it's getting beyond a joke. 

It seems to be an excuse hes made instead of admitting the site cant cope with all the traffic anymore.

There doesnt seem to actually be a post limit, its just luck whether you get on the site or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...