Jump to content

Hillsborough debate


Desert Nomad

Recommended Posts

Pointing the finger at the Liverpool fans is surely now only done by those who have a personal dislike for their supporters - so no surprise to see a Rangers fan on here voice how the court hearings were unsatisfactory by his standards.

 

 

Absolute fanny of a poster.

 

Fans from a number of clubs have posted similar.

 

I, as a Rangers supporter, have posted in defence of Liverpool fans.

 

Take your trolling elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it's because you genuinely are as thick as Dawn French's shite on Boxing Day

Hope that helps

 

My shite is the exact opposite of that on Boxing Day.  Liquid arse magma usually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolute fanny of a poster.

 

Fans from a number of clubs have posted similar.

 

I, as a Rangers supporter, have posted in defence of Liverpool fans.

 

Take your trolling elsewhere.

 

I'd never miss a chance to take a swing at sevco, but throbbers throbbing about this anti-liverpool ergo pro-rangers guff is embarrassing and laughable shite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This could easily rumble on for another 27 years.

 

Forgive my ignorance but what is the Bradford fire theory some have referred to?

 

I assume it relates to this?

 

ETA:

 

Reading the link I just quoted, I noticed this from the judge who overseen the Bradford fire inquiry:

 

 

The citizens of Bradford behaved with quiet dignity and great courage. They did not harbour conspiracy theories. They did not seek endless further inquiries,†he wrote. “They buried their dead, comforted the bereaved and succoured the injured. They organised a sensible compensation scheme and moved on. Is there, perhaps, a lesson there for the Hillsborough campaigners?

Edited by Ross.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume it relates to this?

 

ETA:

 

Reading the link I just quoted, I noticed this from the judge who overseen the Bradford fire inquiry:

Was just going to copy n paste that very paragraph, thereisalight.. must have left his Twitter open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, because my phone autocorrected it?. Analogy then, you pedant

 

It's f**k all to do with being a pedant, you snippy wee c**t.

 

You've been slagged off for being stupid, and then go and prove it, autocorrect or no auto correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbf, the recent Valley Parade fire theory - some have said conspiracy theory - is on a totally different level to Hillsborough.

 

There is plentiful evidence - now conclusively established - of what went wrong at Hillsborough, and I haven't seen anyone claim it was a deliberate act, i.e. that there was actually an intent to create a deadly crush as opposed to negligence and incompetence. What the author of the recent book about Valley Parade "infers" is that it was deliberate arson in an insurance fraud, the main plank of the argument founded on the fact that the chairman had been involved in previous fire insurance cases?

 

Even if the immediate rebuttals - that the stand was not heavily insured, that it was about to be demolished anyway and that police were understood to have identified a man who dropped a cigarette and started it - are wrong: the implication is that a person or persons set it alight while it was full of people on the last day of the season, when burning it down any other day or time could presumably have had the same insurance outcome, without trying to ensure everyone could escape (e.g. by unbarring blocked exits), and managed to keep it secret despite 56 people perishing in the blaze.

 

If it's true, it's a sensation on a scale which would put Hillsborough in the shade. It takes a leap into what many would think incomprehensible.

Edited by HibeeJibee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was asking a question, hence the question mark.

You think I'm stupid because I have a different opinion than you? So you base my intelligence on one factor without knowing anything about me. Wow that smacks of someone oozing intelligence

 

I think it's the voicing of an opinion which has been successfully challenged followed by tantrums and name calling which people are using as evidence to support the view that you are in fact as thick as a superglue milkshake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's the voicing of an opinion which has been successfully challenged followed by tantrums and name calling which people are using as evidence to support the view that you are in fact as thick as a superglue milkshake.

My gripe is with the way the families have acted, not about the findings. Although I refuse to believe that none of the fans there that day didnt push at any point leading up to the tragedy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My gripe is with the way the families have acted, not about the findings. Although I refuse to believe that none of the fans there that day didnt push at any point leading up to the tragedy.

I'd be ashamed of my family if they just folded like a bad hand rather than fought my corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...