Broccoli Dog Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 (edited) They shouldn't even be voting on this shit, was there a vote to admit Annan into the league or was that based purely on the strength of their application? Edited July 12, 2012 by Broccoli Dog 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm not sure Mr McLeish is the ideal man to be pontificating about finance... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amjam Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 It really rips my knitting that Doncaster and Regan are trying to make this vote about league reconstruction rather than about where/if Sevco get voted into the league. It's like they're trying to say that the two things are inextricably entwined, when they actually have f**k all to do with each other. Treat Sevco like any other club and go over their application for a place in the league and decide on it's merits (hint, there are no merits). Then get shot of Doncaster and Regan and have a serious discussion about league reconstruction. It's not rocket science. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Buddie Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Social unrest on the cards at Edinburgh Zoo... At the risk of being called pedantic ( and not for the first time) should it not be 'Mon rather than Mon' ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monrovianmonk Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 The vote postponed nonsense is the same stunt that Doncaster tried to pull on the eve of the SPL vote. Didn't work then and I hope it won't work tomorrow. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgecutter Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 I'm going to cut their fucking hedge down for this ! i) I bet you I'm angrier and ii) that's my job ya p***k. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyrshireTon Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Vote may be postponed If it does they are saying it will be held again just 8 days before the Ramsdens cup games start.It really is getting ridiculous at how many meetings they need,and how long it takes to get rid of a team that has basically made a mockery of Scotland and Scottish football for years. You couldn't make this shit up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted July 12, 2012 Author Share Posted July 12, 2012 At the risk of being called pedantic ( and not for the first time) should it not be 'Mon rather than Mon' ? Probably. We should take a vote on it. I'll organise it as soon as I'm sure I'll get the right result. Will get back to you... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyrshireTon Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Probably. We should take a vote on it. I'll organise it as soon as I'm sure I'll get the right result. Will get back to you... Watch for ballot papers with an SFL3 sticker over the words "SFL1". Would not surprise me if those c***s tried to pull that one too. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 (edited) The vote postponed nonsense is the same stunt that Doncaster tried to pull on the eve of the SPL vote. Didn't work then and I hope it won't work tomorrow. This. Plus, that article in the Hootsmon is by Ewing Grahame, well known swallower of H*n schlong. He will have happily run that story on behalf of Cockwomble, Reneger & Longknife. Edited July 12, 2012 by Florentine_Pogen 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gav-ffc Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Everyone is saying Newco Rangers are being punished by not being allowed into Europe? Its not a punishment its the rules. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 (edited) Plus, that article in the Hootsmon is by Ewing Grahame, well known swallower of H*n schlong. If it weren't for Keith Jackshun, he may even be the swallower in chief. For the avoidance of doubt, I don't include anyone named "Darryl" in the voting. Edited July 12, 2012 by H_B 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffStelling Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 I'm not the least bit surprised at Albion Rovers, who have sold their votes by proxy to whatever Celtic want them to do since the year dot And you know this how? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarksReality Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 VERY proud of the Fife Clubs - Our cry was no surrender, die die die Sevco 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever Diamond Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Secondly - why was Clyde's amendment "dismissed"? Your guess HibeeJibee is as good as the next guys. I always thought i would never live long enough to understand women and how they think.....aye right,they are easy compared to trying to work out what Cockwomble and co are thinking,and where they get their ideas from. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Buddie Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Firstly, postponement is ridiculous. "Oh, we'll lose? No vote"? Ludicrous. Secondly - why was Clyde's amendment "dismissed"? Why is the word "revolt" used in that article? That's usually a word associated with the situation when you decide you DON'T want to abide by the rules as they are already written. To my mind, it's the SFL Board's proposal that is actually the revolting (see what I did there? ) position. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calidad Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Just emailed my club wishing them good luck and to do the right thight tommorrow. Its been fun watching the near melt down of the Daily Old Firm Record the last couple of days. Poor old jorno's must have had hard time trying to keep up retyping out all of the PR guff that was being phoned in by SPL/Charles Green people. As of tommorrow they might actually have to write about the scottish game properly, a few of them might actually start trying to cultivate the wider audience and have whole articles that dont mention "Old Firm" at all. I hope that after tommorrow we can all get behind our game, that the media will do its best to encourage people to get back to their clubs and go to games. If they dont their papers will shrivel even more. After tommorrow lets all get positive about our game. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Your guess HibeeJibee is as good as the next guys. More importantly, who dismissed it? Presumably the SFL board? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Northerner Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 They shouldn't even be voting on this shit, was there a vote to admit Annan into the league or was that based purely on the strength of their application? Annan were one of 5 clubs who applied for the vacancy when Gretna fell off the edge. There were a couple of voting rounds (ditching the losers) until Annan got a majority 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 ^^^^^^^^^ this..........maybe a wee bit hard on Santa, though I caught the b*****d kissing ma mum. Yeh sorry about that.just had to empty my sacks ! hope you liked the bike though 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.