Coastspider Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 You mean there WON'T be a money spinning friendly against Olympiacos? Just looked at the Olympiakos website ( google translation is a great tool) ..quess what not a mention about being asked to play any glamour match against Sevco 5088 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Yes, all the orcs who bought a number 12 shirt will now be showing their allegiance to a variable substitute. They just keep giving, ohh , ma sides. Forgive my ignorance here, but what's the story with number 12 shirt? I've seen references here to it being retired, but now required in a league that doesn't operate squad numbers. Why was it retired though? What's the significance, other than representing the year they died? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huistrinho Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 (edited) You might know better than I, but trying to work thru Blue Pitch, I was left with the impression that one of the names was Geneva based. Maybe I'm putting 2 and 2 together to come up with 6 but it leads me to think the UEFA thing was the cover story for meeting with this 'leading light' to discuss the way ahead now placed in the 3rd. Sound plausible? Seems a strange time otherwise to disappear off the radar (say seeking new investors) when your whole future in terms of a licence is at stake this week. It seems entirely plausible. In fact the UEFA story seems the least likely explanation, given A) they've already said they want nothing to do with it, B) they have repeatedly said that they frown on clubs not paying football debts, and C) Green is running a 3rd division Scottish club with no european involvement for at least 4 years. I'm sure the real story lies entirely behind the reason not to award the club an SFA license as yet. If we look at the possibilities in turn: It's to do with title stripping: this seems unlikely, as the SFA could do this whenever they like, irrespective of granting a license. It's to do with the transfer embargo: possible, but a one month reprieve seems long enough to sell the senior players on big wages and to buy in a set of players capable of winning division two. Unless, there's zero working capital. It's to do with BPH: If Green is the only person to know BPH's true identity, then it accounts for the fact he's not at the most important meeting the club are involved in. It's also ridiculous that this information hasn't been forthcoming before now, given that it is a prerequisite for membership. Is anybody keeping track to see if any other shareholders remain to emerge? Of course, there was also that story about CW jetting out to Geneva on the same day, but given that there was no corroborating evidence, I'm pretty sure that was entirely BS. Edited July 20, 2012 by Huistrinho 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 What if newco got a deal with greggs to have a steak bake as the new mascot, green tried on the costume and in walked fat Sally?? Be nothing left of him Rip hughie 'steak bake' green 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Rangers saved by TV deal Check this pish out :lol: They'll only see a fraction ... If split under the normal formula they'll see 1.2% of it, infact. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Forgive my ignorance here, but what's the story with number 12 shirt? I've seen references here to it being retired, but now required in a league that doesn't operate squad numbers. Why was it retired though? What's the significance, other than representing the year they died? It was incase they were club 12 Or the fans were the 12th man. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Forgive my ignorance here, but what's the story with number 12 shirt? I've seen references here to it being retired, but now required in a league that doesn't operate squad numbers. Why was it retired though? What's the significance, other than representing the year they died? Because, hilariously, the fans are the 12th man. So retiring the shirt was, somehow, a tribute to the wonderful fans at Ibrox. I kid you not. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Forgive my ignorance here, but what's the story with number 12 shirt? I've seen references here to it being retired, but now required in a league that doesn't operate squad numbers. Why was it retired though? What's the significance, other than representing the year they died? They 'retired' the No 12 and dedicated it to the fans. The 12th man if you like, to say thanks for all their support. Snigger Sorry. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drooper Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Forgive my ignorance here, but what's the story with number 12 shirt? I've seen references here to it being retired, but now required in a league that doesn't operate squad numbers. Why was it retired though? What's the significance, other than representing the year they died? Retired in honour of their twelfth man.... the loyal bears! Would bring a tear to a glass eye, so it would. In other news, over here in Menorca, I was enjoying a mid-morning coffee at the bar when a slightly portly young chap - perhaps 16 or 17 (stones and/or years) - rolls up in his TCFKAR top. Oh dear. I had to restrain my mirth (I'm a middle aged man, after all), but it seemed that several other people nearby were less willing to follow suit. He could be in for a week or two of pain and ridicule. I blame his parents. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Leitch Loyal Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 As the SFA offices are now (presumably) closed for the weekend with no news of Sevco's license can we assume the Hawick game is off? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broccoli Dog Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 As the SFA offices are now (presumably) closed for the weekend with no news of Sevco's license can we assume the Hawick game is off? It's been postponed now, yep. http://twitter.com/hawickra 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted July 20, 2012 Author Share Posted July 20, 2012 Anyone currently at home, maybe browsing on an iPad or similar device? Flick the telly over to BBC 1 to get an idea of what the four stands at Sevco home games will look like this season... If they ever play one that is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p&b is a disgrace Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 There is an infinite number of ridiculous statements to play with "If they play on the streets, then we shall follow from the pavements....until police forbid it due to the safety risks involved". I saw someone on facebook with the whole shite about streets/pavement, yet her nor any of her family have ever been to Ibrox. :lol: thats from the thread that got me banned. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Poor Hawick - that would've been quite a good money spinner for them. Kelty Hearts must be gettng a bit worried, seeing as their match is also a testimonial. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Anyone currently at home, maybe browsing on an iPad or similar device? Flick the telly over to BBC 1 to get an idea of what the four stands at Sevco home games will look like this season... If they ever play one that is. It even features a team pretending to be British. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Thanks for the responses. That step had somehow passed me by. :lol: I just love the fact that they wish to honour the 12th man that has managed to make an already shit situation so much worse for them. Absolute fucking idiots - the lot of them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeHectorPar Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 They 'retired' the No 12 and dedicated it to the fans. The 12th man if you like, to say thanks for all their support. Snigger Sorry. Quite appropriate as that's about the number of loyal supporters they will have in a year's time. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 If split under the normal formula they'll see 1.2% of it, infact. ."" The interest Rangers' plight has generated globally cannot be overstated "" Deluded. It took ages before even the English media cottoned on. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymores Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 It seems entirely plausible. In fact the UEFA story seems the least likely explanation, given A) they've already said they want nothing to do with it, B) they have repeatedly said that they frown on clubs not paying football debts, and C) Green is running a 3rd division Scottish club with no european involvement for at least 4 years. I'm sure the real story lies entirely behind the reason not to award the club an SFA license as yet. If we look at the possibilities in turn: It's to do with title stripping: this seems unlikely, as the SFA could do this whenever they like, irrespective of granting a license. It's to do with the transfer embargo: possible, but a one month reprieve seems long enough to sell the senior players on big wages and to buy in a set of players capable of winning division two. Unless, there's zero working capital. It's to do with BPH: If Green is the only person to know BPH's true identity, then it accounts for the fact he's not at the most important meeting the club are involved in. It's also ridiculous that this information hasn't been forthcoming before now, given that it is a prerequisite for membership. Is anybody keeping track to see if any other shareholders remain to emerge? Of course, there was also that story about CW jetting out to Geneva on the same day, but given that there was no corroborating evidence, I'm pretty sure that was entirely BS. I agree it's tough to keep track when Timmaloys introduce red herrings all over the place about Whyte (I'd read the one about him going to Geneva!). I've been busy with real work this week (!) but first got the drift when it was pointed-out that Chas claimed he was flying to Zurich to see UEFA..........a bit like flying to East Midlands for a crunch meeting @ Hampden!. I'd be worried if a 'Rangers' fan who looks at it objectively - as you say, wherever Chas has gone MUST be more important than the philibusting talks at Hampden. Do you agree? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.