Invalid Probe Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 SPL articles of association. 17. Whenever a requirement to transfer a Share shall arise, if the relevant Member shall fail to transfer its Share within seven (7) days of notice having been given of the requirement to transfer, the Board may authorise any Director of the Company to execute a transfer thereof and a transfer so executed shall be valid and effective as if the same had been executed by the Member concerned and the transferee shall on payment of the sum of £1 to the Secretary to be held in trust for the transferor be entered in the register of Members as the holder of such Share. So what's the problem, why are they bartering for the share? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 SPL articles of association. 17. Whenever a requirement to transfer a Share shall arise, if the relevant Member shall fail to transfer its Share within seven (7) days of notice having been given of the requirement to transfer, the Board may authorise any Director of the Company to execute a transfer thereof and a transfer so executed shall be valid and effective as if the same had been executed by the Member concerned and the transferee shall on payment of the sum of £1 to the Secretary to be held in trust for the transferor be entered in the register of Members as the holder of such Share. So what's the problem, why are they bartering for the share? Aye, they could've even done it yesterday/today and it'd be sorted by next Saturday. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdinburghPar1975 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 Doncaster had stated on Radio Scotland on the interview with Richard Gordon that they could forcibly take back the share. If there is an issue with this then the Rangers fans should be concerned as it may well be that Charlies not parted with the cash... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P45 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 Seems that they can only play the guys they have signed up plus 2 trialists. Brechin must fancy this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillieJimbo Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 (edited) Maybe they will hedge their bets and play for a draw I wonder when that replay will get played. Edited July 27, 2012 by KillieJimbo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jags4ever Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 Could we see the one and only appearance of SevcoZombieRangers this weekend ? Now that would be funny as f**k 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desert Nomad Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 Maybe they will hedge their bets and play for a draw Deary me 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever Diamond Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 Oh please,please,let it be that Charlie does not have the money to pay Haudit and Daudit.Also,please,please,let it also be he will be gone before the Aug 3rd deadline. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 You`d have thought so, but... Also Green standing fast over the SPL not investigating the dual contracts, that sounds like an admission of guilt to me. The SPL don't need Rangers permission to investigate Rangers or to hold a hearing concerning EBT's, the problem is that Rangers are rightly refusing to waive their right of appeal and the sporting integrity league are trying to use it as leverage to get Rangers media rights. Next time get your facts right. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P45 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 The mentalness continues. kathleen sweeney @springburn64 @STVGrant how much football debt do they have to pay back Grant Russell @STVGrant @springburn64 Around £2.5m ___ ♪ Vicki Lindsay ♪ @VickiK_L @STVGrant and if they don’t agree to sign over SPL share to Dundee? Grant Russell @STVGrant @VickiK_L It can be forcibly removed but not until Aug 7 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 Seems that they can only play the guys they have signed up plus 2 trialists. Brechin must fancy this. Interesting, so they're being "temporarily" transferred the SFA membership, but effectively with an immediate full registration embargo? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow Loon Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 Doncaster had stated on Radio Scotland on the interview with Richard Gordon that they could forcibly take back the share. If there is an issue with this then the Rangers fans should be concerned as it may well be that Charlies not parted with the cash... If Charlie hasnt parted with the cash then the SFA have to say sorry you cant have the oldco membership. Also Duff & Phelps could say to Charlie you have had long enough to pay the £5.5m, sorry the deal is off as you cant come up with the money. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 Doncaster had stated on Radio Scotland on the interview with Richard Gordon that they could forcibly take back the share. If there is an issue with this then the Rangers fans should be concerned as it may well be that Charlies not parted with the cash... Is he going to round with baseball bat and beat them up The sporting integrity league are holding things up for one reason and one reason alone, media rights. It seems they needed us afterall. -9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Araminta Moonbeam QC Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 It would be bizarre if this were the one and only game played by Sevco FC. Well, at least Brechin would make a few quid. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 (edited) @VickiK_L It can be forcibly removed but not until Aug 7 I.e. they'd act on Monday? Why didn't they act today. Why can't Dundee receive a spare. Something doesn't quite stack-up here. Edited July 27, 2012 by HibeeJibee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P45 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 uistbhoy88 @uistbhoy88 @STVGrant @DarcheVinny but you said D&P will do what Green wants. what's the issue here? Grant Russell @STVGrant @uistbhoy88 @DarcheVinny Because Green is instructing them not to sign off. What's Green's problem? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 I.e. they'd act on Monday? Why didn't they act today. Why can't Dundee receive a spare. Well that would be the sensible thing to do but seeing as it's the sporting integrity league .............. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Invalid Probe Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 The mentalness continues. kathleen sweeney @springburn64 @STVGrant how much football debt do they have to pay back Grant Russell @STVGrant @springburn64 Around £2.5m ___ ♪ Vicki Lindsay ♪ @VickiK_L @STVGrant and if they don't agree to sign over SPL share to Dundee? Grant Russell @STVGrant @VickiK_L It can be forcibly removed but not until Aug 7 This date has been quoted a few times, why? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 This date has been quoted a few times, why? I was assuming it means they'd begin the process on Monday i.e. they've not done anything until now, they would move on Monday, meaning once 7 days has passed it'd be the next Tuesday, 7th Aug. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Invalid Probe Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 I was assuming it means they'd begin the process on Monday i.e. they've not done anything until now, they would move on Monday, meaning once 7 days has passed it'd be the next Tuesday, 7th Aug. Well that seems a bit fucking stupid and lacking any foresight. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.