hellbhoy Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 That's the problem Youngsy , these people will make up any old shite to suit their agenda AH HA your talking about Charles Green aren't you,says one thing and then anther when it suits his agenda. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 This body exists purely to protect the interests of big clubs, so it's no surprise they're supportive of Rangers. Nobody is claiming that the latest incarnation of Rangers is small, just new. You know Youngsy, the vehemence of your post had me doubting myself (always a mistake) so I checked. It turns out of course that I was entirely right. ECA is indeed a successor to G14. It now has more members, but they're all drawn from the biggest clubs in each country. So what I said is not unbelievable or pish and I've not fell(sic) into any mindset. I await your apology. There's the post i replied to. The inference i took from that was that you were as dismissive of the ECA and their finding about the club as most others on here,whether you agree or not with the ECA is neither here nor there but at least give them credence for reaching their finding without bias or influence you failed to do that,therefore giving the impression that no matter which body gives a decision in favour of the continuation you would be opposed to that decision. However what i failed to realise was that you do recognise(to a degree) the continuity,so for that i apologise to you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mason Boyne Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 AH HA your talking about Charles Green aren't you,says one thing and then anther when it suits his agenda. ^^^ illegitimate 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 ^^^^^ raging Absolutely fucking raging here and about to smash the TV with the keyboard n aw that 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 ^^^ illegitimate Inadequate ^^^^ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 I'm on the same thinking as you Monkey Tennis that Rangers are a sort of continuance,but mines is that it is the continuance of a Rangers team that plays football at Ibrox. Rangers fans claiming continuance of a dead club is funny because they can't handle the club having to die first before it was reformed,they keep banging on about it's the very same club when it clearly is not.There was a Rangers team formed in 1872 that died because of crippling debts,Green then reformed another Rangers team out of the ashes and corpse of the dying club in 2012 aKa Sevco Scotland to take the place of the then defunct debt ridden club and now we have The Clone Rangers Football club PLC. No ones actually claiming it's not Rangers because it clearly is,it just isn't the club that used to occupy the stadium even though it lays claim to the old clubs honours and will continue as Rangers in every way the old one did. But it will always be known that Rangers the club died in 2012 even if it was for weeks but it was most certainly dead. Will the "you're deid" brigade still be popping up in 2 years' time? Or 20 years' time? Sadly, they probably will. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mason Boyne Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Absolutely fucking raging here and about to smash the TV with the keyboard n aw that ^^^^ lying 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 ^^^ illegitimate ^^^^^ You can stop now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mason Boyne Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Inadequate ^^^^ ^^^ doing it wrong 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 ^^^ doing it wrong ^^^ Forever Hibs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mason Boyne Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 ^^^^^ You can stop now. ^^^ feck off 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 /\ /\ /\ /\ Plastic. ^^^ <---- are too big in your post. ^^^^^ Rattled 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mason Boyne Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 ^^^ Forever Hibs. ^^^ simpleton 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mason Boyne Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Right , time for another Singleton , later 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 <---- Handsome 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Will the "you're deid" brigade still be popping up in 2 years' time? Or 20 years' time? Sadly, they probably will. OH deffo BWM as one of those comments to the opposition just to score points and wind them up. I'm looking forward to Celtic & Rangers meeting up since last year because the threads and comments will certainly be funny. If Green could come up with the cash to pay the oldco's creditors because they got a favourable outcome in the BTC and acquired the oldco's companies house registration then there would be no argument IT'S RANGERS ! B@STARDS ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 ^^^ doing it wrong AW FFS I don't wanna know what yer other half says to you when your pumping her. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 (edited) There's the post i replied to. The inference i took from that was that you were as dismissive of the ECA and their finding about the club as most others on here,whether you agree or not with the ECA is neither here nor there but at least give them credence for reaching their finding without bias or influence you failed to do that,therefore giving the impression that no matter which body gives a decision in favour of the continuation you would be opposed to that decision. However what i failed to realise was that you do recognise(to a degree) the continuity,so for that i apologise to you. Fair enough. As you know, there's lots of analysis of sources when they get cited on here. It's fair enough, but it's influenced much of the reponse to failed lawyers, IRA writers, Leggo etc. What I was saying was that ECA would, in my view be expected to see things the way Rangers would wish. Rangers were a founding member and I'd maintain that the body is dedicated to the interests of the powerful. As for continuation, I conceded a version of it a while back. It was in response to your very own claim that you'd answer on what might be considered fair, if fans would accept continuation. As I said then - and since - I don't think it's seamless and I think it must be recognised that liquidation is what led to SFL3. However, clubs are defined by their fans, and the Rangers ones, for good or very ill - appear to still be in place. I can therefore accept a significant degree of continuation. Edited January 4, 2013 by Monkey Tennis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotbawmad Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 (edited) Guys, I think you're talking to a brick wall when it comes to Tedi The Liar and Blinkered Bennett. I understand you're trying to explain basic business laws, and I know football authorites broke their own rules to accomodate their zombified club. However, time and time again when faced with the indefensible or undeniable. They and the others will simply ignore, deflect, bring up a meaningless or discredited source to back up their argument. Edited January 4, 2013 by Fotbawmad 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 thats worked well tonight In terms of showing you up to be repetitive and without any form of counter argument i would say that it has been a great success. Consider yourself owned. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.