The_Kincardine Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 the clubs image will be owned by other entities wanting their cut from the carcasses before allowing the plebs to say it's still Rangers FC. Doesn't Sir Charles of Normandy own the brand/image rights? Look at the pair of them. We all know that HB became a QC and CA on the back of The Big Thread but now he and the wee Paisley cyclist are morphing in to IP lawyers based on some internet rumour. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 the wee Paisley cyclist I'm just hopeful of picking up a few crumbs of knowledge from a learned legal eagle such as HBQC. You may have made me chuckle but that doesn't mean you're forgiven for my exclusion from the 411. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-MAN Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 (edited) "Settling his court battle". Erm maybe but he was guilty of the biggest fraud in SA. "Spending 30M of his kids inheritance" Jesus what is this shit Edited October 9, 2014 by G-MAN 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2014/oct/08/mike-ashley-rangers-newcastle-naming-rights 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macshimmy Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 Some quality commentary from Newcastle fans on that Guardian article: "Can the board confirm that renaming Ibrox will not be part of any underwriting deal?” asks Chris Graham, a spokesman for Rangers’ Union of Fans. “And that we will not see the garish Sports Direct signage defacing our iconic main stand?” Once you become Mr. A's chattel, he can tattoo Sports Direct direct onto your arse if he pleases. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 The badge on the front of the shirt is more important than the name on the back, eh 8? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 The badge on the front of the shirt is more important than the name on the back, eh 8? I think they're about to find out that the important name is on the wee tag inside - the one with "xxxxxl" on it... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 The badge on the front of the shirt is more important than the name on the back, eh 8? stoney the teuchter -3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highlandmagyar Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 I think they're about to find out that the important name is on the wee tag inside - the one with "xxxxxl" on it... Isn't that a small size in Sevco fashion? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 The badge on the front of the shirt is more important than the name on the back, eh 8? It certainly is Tuechter 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 It certainly is Tuechter wee aofjays dosnae like anybody calling somebody a teuchter. sorry aofjays 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Willie Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 (edited) It certainly is Tuechter That's no how ye spell Teuchter ye country bumkin Edit: and I cannae spell bumpkin Edited October 9, 2014 by Wee Willie 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 That's no how ye spell Teuchter ye country bumkin Is Bumkin no one of they racist terms?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 Is Bumkin no one of they racist terms?? stoney has been all over the place of late , one minut ehe is informing us that words themselves are not racist but infact it is the people who use them that are, next he is making a thread claiming that a word is racist 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Willie Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 Is Bumkin no one of they racist terms?? I'm sure it's Munchkin Munchkin Some one who is very small, not necessarily a child, just a small person. Generally used by people bigger than them. The b*****ds says wee willie 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 Bloody Chelsea fans. http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/aston-villa-unseen-photos-villa-7899872 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 How long will this drip feed tug of war continue or will one faction ensure liquidation happens to get what they need? Who gives a feck ? This is the best armchair theatre on the go at the moment. Still The Phlegms bang on about their glorious club (sic) and it's history yet they cannot face face the fact that to the asset strippers and spivs who are in charge, all they see is an entity which is capable of being broken up for profit. No glorious past. No cup wins. No league wins. No staunchness. No sashyness. No brown broguery. Where are Messrs. Regan, Cockwomble and Ogilvie these days ? We are watching the slow painful death of Entity FC and it's feckin' great. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macshimmy Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 Is Bumkin no one of they racist terms?? No. Bumkin is homophobic. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Willie Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 No. Bumkin is homophobic. Well spotted...but I did amend it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2014/oct/08/mike-ashley-rangers-newcastle-naming-rights Whats this about St Mirren paying weans a £1 per week and sending them down chimenys and mines? Yet we're still the bad guys. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.