ribzanelli Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 He was buying a business from Whyte....only a fucking idiot would have believed they never talked to each other. Big difference from talking and meeting than working together. Do you believe they weren't in it together? It doesn't matter to me either way but given the stuff already in the public domain it seems a bit of a stretch. What was the 'you are Sevco' stuff all about? I notice the bbc report mentions there was no evidence of a link between Whyte and Sevco Scotland Ltd but then isn't that his point entirely - that Green used a similarly named company so as to stiff him? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Anyway since this independent enquiry has shown no link between Sevco Scotland Ltd and Whyte and all the paperwork held by the SFA says Sevco Scotland Ltd then will the SFA have the balls to continue with an investigation that would surely end up in court should they suggest something different to the enquiries findings? My money says they will drop it but never officially announce they have dropped it, SFA style. Would they not be better served by waiting until after Whyte's court case against Green? That's still happening yeh? Timescale? Sent from my GT-N7000 using Pie & Bovril mobile app 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 He was buying a business from Whyte....only a fucking idiot would have believed they never talked to each other. Big difference from talking and meeting than working together. I'm sure like all Bears you've blocked out the embarrassing administration process but, 1) Chuckles didn't buy any business, he bought some of the assets that used to belong to RFC(IL) and attached them to his new vehicle Sevco( Scotland or 5088, you decide) 2) He never bought anything from Whyte, he bought it from Duff and Duffer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 No wonder the Bears did practically Hee-Haw when the old Rangers died, they'd rather crow about another Pyrrhic victory than face the reality of their situation. In Walter We Trust. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 BDO's six month statutory report; http://www.bdo.uk.com/services/advisory/business-restructuring/rfc-2012-plc-formerly-rangers-football-club-plc-liquidation 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kildog Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Yet again the Ps&Ds backed a loser. It has come to them believing the likes of proven liar and all round shyster in their desperation to bring our club down. 54 titles and still going strong. Rangers cheated. Then they died. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Day Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Shocker that Rangers appointed enquiry finds Rangers not guilty. The 54 titles version of Rangers are emphatically NOT still going strong. They died - surely you remember that event? What are you implying? The enquiry gave Rangers what we wanted to hear? You're a bitter one. How the f**k can titles die? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 So after a full investigation in which the main relevant parties Mr Green and Mr Whyte declined to co-operate, they concluded that there definitely was probably maybe no involvement according to the limited information available to a inherently limited process. So most of the cards are on the table, but we will just slip this lovely tablecloth on to make it look presentable. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 What are you implying? The enquiry gave Rangers what we wanted to hear? You're a bitter one. How the f**k can titles die 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Day Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Do you believe they weren't in it together? It doesn't matter to me either way but given the stuff already in the public domain it seems a bit of a stretch. What was the 'you are Sevco' stuff all about? I notice the bbc report mentions there was no evidence of a link between Whyte and Sevco Scotland Ltd but then isn't that his point entirely - that Green used a similarly named company so as to stiff him? I personally think they were "in on it" together to purchase the club but Green saw the opportunity and shafted Whyte. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 alex thomson @alextomo 1mCraig Whyte camp pointing out he never claimed any Sevco Scotland involvement and that’s the whole point 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Double Jack D Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 I personally think they were "in on it" together to purchase the club but Green saw the opportunity and shafted Whyte. If the judge in the imminent court battle agrees then there will be serious repercussions for Sevco Scotland and hence Rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Day Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 You believe that do you? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Double Jack D Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 I wonder how much Pinsent Masons charged Rangers to produce a report that Craig Whyte had no involvement with Sevco Scotland. Not sure this isn't further proving Craig Whytes point with regard to Greens fraud in creating a similar named company and shafting him out of their agreement. Looks like they'll meet in court, I'm away to buy shares in Butterkist! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Day Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 If the judge in the imminent court battle agrees then there will be serious repercussions for Sevco Scotland and hence Rangers. I agree. I am not clued up enough to know the legalities around it but shafting someone in business is not often "by the book" so to speak 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Day Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 alex thomson @alextomo 1m Craig Whyte camp pointing out he never claimed any Sevco Scotland involvement and that’s the whole point Thommo is fading so fast he's latched onto whyte. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuoAnLai Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Well the good news about Walter getting the gig is it probably keeps Sally safe. Guaranteed to be an entertaining season ahead. Maybe Walter will unlock the 10M warchest that he needs to get out of SFL2? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 And WKR. They spend all their time slagging off Celtic and rangers and you say one word against them and they are throwing their toys out the pram and crying about arse cheeks As I said they are very sensitive, and they actually think it bothers Celtic fans they don't like us :lol: Sometimes i think we can be a bit too rough and boisterous for the wee lambs, if they dont like it then they can GTF. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 If its true about Walter Smith being appointed chairman then thats a mistake, i'm guessing here but i'm fairly sure that his knowledge of the inner workings of businesses and finance is limited. I hoep i'm wrong but i can't see him having the clout needed to deal with the shareholders and investors. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Anyway since this independent enquiry has shown no link between Sevco Scotland Ltd and Whyte and all the paperwork held by the SFA says Sevco Scotland Ltd then will the SFA have the balls to continue with an investigation that would surely end up in court should they suggest something different to the enquiries findings? My money says they will drop it but never officially announce they have dropped it, SFA style. I hope you're right, i can see them using this as a chance to leather us. If the paperwork is all for Sevco scotland then i assume that Regan and co can whistle in the wind. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.