Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

Jim Spence is having a field day today

attachicon.gifImageUploadedByPie & Bovril1446642963.076991.jpg

Why do so many **** think that HMRC have only won the right to appeal and not the appeal itself by the way? Who's feeding them their bullshit?

I'm guessing they are just reading this:

"we will accordingly allow HMRC’s appeal"

wrongly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just keep hoping pozbaird unchecked the "send notifications" on this thread. :lol:

Haven't been on here for a good while now... Just saw the tribute act's stadium pop up on a TV screen during the main BBC news programme and wondered what was going on.

So briefly reading some pages on here it appears to be currently The Rangers 2 HMRC 1. I assume one of the verdicts was a last minute dodgy verdict that was clearly offside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scottish Cup Semi :(

We'll take the 2000 Scottish Cup while we're at it. The Discount Option Scheme which was stomped on by HMRC, was operated up to 2001. It was proved beyond any reasonable doubt by HMRC that these were taxable payments that Deadco hid from the Taxman.

For some as yet unknown reason the SPL decided to lump the DOS and EBT rulings together without considering any of the DOS evidence. Funny that. Championees etc.

Edited by williemillersmoustache
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please correct me here.

Old Rangers have lost the Big Tax case and owe HMRC £42,000,000 now.

New Rangers don't need to pay anything as they are a new entity?

But how come SEVCO fans seem to think they are the same club? If they are they will have a £42 million Tax bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please correct me here.

Old Rangers have lost the Big Tax case and owe HMRC £42,000,000 now.

New Rangers don't need to pay anything as they are a new entity?

But how come SEVCO fans seem to think they are the same club? If they are they will have a £42 million Tax bill.

Ahhh the Westcoastian question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing they are just reading this:

"we will accordingly allow HMRC’s appeal"

wrongly.

And that is why they have been conned on every issue from the beginning of this saga.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conclusion
[92] For the foregoing reasons we will accordingly allow HMRC’s appeal on the first ground advanced by them. On that basis we will answer the fourth question in the appeal in the affirmative, and hold that the First-tier Tribunal erred in allowing the original appeal and that the Upper Tribunal erred in refusing the appeal before it. The other questions in the appeal do not therefore arise. The assessments to PAYE have been correctly made, for the reasons already discussed. On that basis we will recall the orders of the First-tier and Upper Tribunals and affirm the determinations appealed against, including that relating to PAYE, with the exception of the determinations and decisions concerning Sir David Murray in relation to the Bel Azur property transaction, which is conceded by HMRC. We will reserve the question of expenses in view of the history of the appeals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...