strichener Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Yeah, it is rather deliciously oozing out of you. That is is lost as in the exact opposite of won, which is what you wished had happened. and before you deny it, nobody believes you. I think you need to go and have a wee rest and come back when you have taken your meds. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Mike will find a way to make sure he has the best lawyer money can buy, there is no way he will want charlie singing. Are you saying that a; Charlie is guilty of something and/or b; Mike conspired with Charlie? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 The QC already has the legal beagle role on here. No legal opinion was offered, just an interpretation of English. It would appear that even this goes over your head. Perhaps you need to have a lawyer explain "Haha fucking ha" to you but most people will manage quite fine without one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Hmmmm did they conspire as stoney suggests? Maybe general mike is just an excellent negotiator...... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 No legal opinion was offered, just an interpretation of English. It would appear that even this goes over your head. Perhaps you need to have a lawyer explain "Haha fucking ha" to you but most people will manage quite fine without one. Seriously, why has this upset you much? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Hmmmm did they conspire as stoney suggests? Maybe general mike is just an excellent negotiator...... Nice try. I think you will find it is Tedi skirting with contempt of court. I merely sought clarification. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Nice try. I think you will find it is Tedi skirting with contempt of court. I merely sought clarification. Surely not! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Surely not! Surely! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Mike will find a way to make sure he has the best lawyer money can buy, there is no way he will want charlie singing. So Mike is the good guy now? What a tangled web you weave. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 (edited) Heated debate on RM about whether it's 1872 or 1873. For me... BLUE FANNIES FC 1873 (DECEASED) I am dying to post that on there but they may suss me out. Lol Surrendered Edited November 26, 2015 by shull 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Is the moron actually celebrating, who pays Greens legal fees as a victory, even though it has nothing to do with his main court case?! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 (edited) Ach it would have been funny if it had gone the other way, if for no other reason than that his reaction today, shows us what effect the opposite outcome would have had on a now thoroughly bewildered and baying Tedi. However, it was an outrageously cheeky claim by Green and he really had no sensible right to have his fees paid by the club he screwed. I for one, really welcome the newly prominent roles that morality and common sense seem to be playing in the rulings we're seeing. Edited November 26, 2015 by Monkey Tennis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Tedi = the mayor of Hiroshima being cock-a-hoop when he heard the Enola Gay pilot stubbed his toe while disembarking. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Tedi = the mayor of Hiroshima being cock-a-hoop when he heard the Enola Gay pilot stubbed his toe while disembarking. It's like someone selling you a stolen car, and he's up in court for it, and if found guilty you'll loose your car, but you're claiming a victory and a big GIRYUY because you're not paying his legal fees, which means he's even more likely to loose , brilliant. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 If green had won the P and B ERS would have been partying. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kildog Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 A lot of posters on here jizzed themselves when this news came out, even more online proclaimed he could not lose, forgive me If I laugh like f**k at every one of these obsessive fuckers. and yes I will laugh again if he gets sent down for fraud, yes because he may have defrauded Rangers but I will again take pleasure in laughing at those who`s hatred of all things Rangers means they would want to see a then convicted fraudster like Green get off scot free. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 De boer on sky sports getting the diddies telt that the EBT had heehaw to do with him signing for the world famous Glasgow Rangers #ebtmemories Very nice. But how does that fit with Walter getting an ebt whilst at Everton ? Or that thug Souness whilst at Newcastle ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 So this means there isn't ring fenced money in the rangers accounts to pay for this. Just means there is less need for King to over invest. Tbh this is neither here nor there in the grand scheme of things. It was a wee hilarious amuse bouche before the main course of the court cases. If the admin liquidation story wasn't convoluted and interesting enough. It's about to gain arms and legs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Aye Tedi. I've not had a look at it but I will tomorrow. It is something worth debating, I'm still in the 73 camp,but heho I'm only a fitba fan. Rangers were formed in 1873. 'Rangers' were formed in 2012 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 This had an airing yet? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.