THE KING Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 "It can not be concluded Mr Llambias was appointed at the direction of Mr Ashley" court told. Bu but but.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom McB Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 January transfer window spend: Mike Ashley - £28.5 million Dave King - £0.5 million Remind me - why did the Rangers fans prefer King? Let's remind ourselves of the mindset 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 2nd each year would be the bar, most Rangers fan I know are accepting of the reality of this, they can also see how weak celtic are despite having a budget 6 x what Aberdeen have. Celtic are weak yeah but that's all they have to be at the moment. How much do you reckon Rangers will have to increase their wage bill by to challenge for the title ? 5 million ? 10 million ? Where's it coming from ? I wouldn't be surprised if Killy gubbed yous at the weekend and Warburton leaves in the summer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 (edited) Celtic are weak yeah but that's all they have to be at the moment. How much do you reckon Rangers will have to increase their wage bill by to challenge for the title ? 5 million ? 10 million ? Where's it coming from ? I wouldn't be surprised if Killy gubbed yous at the weekend and Warburton leaves in the summer. £150m at the minimum would be my guess if we wanted to match roaring ronnies rockets. Edited February 4, 2016 by bennett -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe schmo Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 I was wondering who the bitter wee runt was! That's no way to talk about your mother, I heard she was a delightful wee runt 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 £150m at the minimum would be my guess if we wanted to match roaring ronnies rockets. £150 BAR may not be enough. We should be looking for tax-efficient ways of boosting players' income. Discretionary payments via a trust should be explored IMO. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 I reckon with a decent manager £8m per year, so an increase of £2m, given the latest financials that should be achievable.you've got a decent manager and he has a magic hat. Plus your admitting to needing a few million £ to compete with Celtic. Look at all the teams in the top division how many spend millions on players.? This sort of we need to spend loads to beat them mentality got you into this mess in the first place now you want the club/company to repeat the same mistakes. Oh well carry on as we sit and laugh 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Celtic are spending £30M+ I am advocating that we only need to spend around a quarter of that figure, you are not really paying attention.your club don't need to spend anywhere near even that. As I said look at the rest of the top division. What club has spent anywhere near a million this season on transfers for a player. ? And how many have made money from selling players. ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 The Club 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Rangers give notice to Sports Direct to end contract. That has now been completed and the Club has formally given notice to end the relationship with Sports Direct while still reserving our right to proceed with challenges to the existing suite of contracts and side agreements in a court of law. "For the first time a board of this Club has stood up to the threats of Sports Direct and has achieved resounding success in court proceedings including the substantial recovery of legal costs. "Sports Direct’s motives were severely exposed when a High Court judge ruled that Sports Direct abused court processes in its attempt to bully the Club and me. "We will continue to put Rangers first and ensure that we get redress and compensation for the poor commercial and business practices that the Club has been forced to endure." but what about THE COMPANY? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Rangers give notice to Sports Direct to end contract. That has now been completed and the Club has formally given notice to end the relationship with Sports Direct while still reserving our right to proceed with challenges to the existing suite of contracts and side agreements in a court of law. "For the first time a board of this Club has stood up to the threats of Sports Direct and has achieved resounding success in court proceedings including the substantial recovery of legal costs. "Sports Direct’s motives were severely exposed when a High Court judge ruled that Sports Direct abused court processes in its attempt to bully the Club and me. "We will continue to put Rangers first and ensure that we get redress and compensation for the poor commercial and business practices that the Club has been forced to endure." Ps...just 7 years to go. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 minus legal challenges, Rangers have been sort of winning rather a lot of these recently. Sorry but you haven't won anything of importance. The only 2 things that matter: 1) £5m ...paid back even though you said he could fuk off because it was an erroneous contract. 2) 7 year notice... 1 nil to Ashley 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 2nd each year would be the bar, most Rangers fan I know are accepting of the reality of this, they can also see how weak celtic are despite having a budget 6 x what Aberdeen have. Second for how many years? Enough for Celtic to get to ten-in-a-row? How will that go down with the masses? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Second for how many years? Enough for Celtic to get to ten-in-a-row? How will that go down with the masses? You think it'll take Rangers another decade? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 I reckon with a decent manager £8m per year, so an increase of £2m, given the latest financials that should be achievable. I admire your optimism. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyWellFan Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 You think it'll take Rangers another decade? I think it will take longer. Sellick are woeful but will have the capability to bring in a much higher quality than Rangers will for a long time. 'The journey' only really starts when they finally manage to get promoted. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Rangers give notice to Sports Direct to end contract. That has now been completed and the Club has formally given notice to end the relationship with Sports Direct while still reserving our right to proceed with challenges to the existing suite of contracts and side agreements in a court of law. "For the first time a board of this Club has stood up to the threats of Sports Direct and has achieved resounding success in court proceedings including the substantial recovery of legal costs. "Sports Direct’s motives were severely exposed when a High Court judge ruled that Sports Direct abused court processes in its attempt to bully the Club and me. "We will continue to put Rangers first and ensure that we get redress and compensation for the poor commercial and business practices that the Club has been forced to endure." Surely Mike Ashley is part of the club? He owns a big enough share in it. He was bullying the incumbent board, not the club. Another Ibrox lie. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Second for how many years? Enough for Celtic to get to ten-in-a-row? How will that go down with the masses? The way things are going Rangers could die again next summer and Celtic might still f**k up 10 in a row 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 I think it will take longer. Sellick are woeful but will have the capability to bring in a much higher quality than Rangers will for a long time. 'The journey' only really starts when they finally manage to get promoted. I don't think so , gonna stick my nose out and say should Rangers inevetably go up this year then I think we will be taking the title from Aberdeen within at least 3-5 years 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 The SD contract won't last 7 years. The confidentiality agreement will be ripped up and this absurd retail agreement will follow suit not long after. It won't transform our finances but being in control of our own merchandising should add £3ish million to our bottom line which should bring us back to fiscal equilibrium on current rates of spend. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.