Guest Flash Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Rangers have brought Thornhill back, playing in the lone striker role. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muirkirk nil Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 1 hour ago, Flash said: Live coverage of the BTC on the Supreme Court website at 10am. https://www.supremecourt.uk/live/court-01.html 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Coral vs gambler boy. Rangers were not relegated. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, weirdcal said: Coral vs gambler boy. Rangers were not relegated. Well, well, well... What did happen to them? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Brees Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Some company went bust and had a fire sale. It sold some assets to a new company. However, some assets said f**k that and went to different football clubs. The new club was then granted a licence to begin playing football in Scotland's bottom league. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 4 hours ago, Flash said: Live coverage of the BTC on the Supreme Court website at 10am. Will probably get higher viewing figures than coronation Street. -4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heedthebaa Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 4 hours ago, Flash said: Rangers have brought Thornhill back, playing in the lone striker role. Some man Mr T once called "a prostitute to the tax world" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Neil McCann just mentioned in the same room that held the Gina Miller case and with a number of the same judges. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 15 minutes ago, heedthebaa said: Some man Mr T once called "a prostitute to the tax world" Quit your jibba jabba fool! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Anyone actually watch it or are we all waiting for the full time and an idea if ebts were legal or not.We already have rangers not being relegated or demoted as part of a judicial decision. It could be interesting times 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 5 hours ago, weirdcal said: Coral vs gambler boy. Rangers were not relegated. 5 hours ago, Romeo said: Well, well, well... What did happen to them? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 13 minutes ago, stonedsailor said: Not sure I like the example they give. The Championship is embarrassing enough without the threat of division 2. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTaxMan Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 9 hours ago, Romeo said: Well, well, well... What did happen to them? The clumpany died and a new clumpany bought some of the assets of the old clumpany, applied to take the place of the old clumpany in the SPL, got told to do one so applied to join the SFL at the bottom. Clear? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 Actually Lord Bannatyne made it clear in the ruling about the bet that Rangers continue, having been sold to the new company. It is correct that we weren't relegated, meaning in this case that we didn't enter the other league due to our points total. We left the SPL and joined the SFL following votes - and votes are no proof of anything other than the opinions of those voting (or their fans). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewHope Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 48 minutes ago, Bearwithme said: Actually Lord Bannatyne made it clear in the ruling about the bet that Rangers continue, having been sold to the new company. It is correct that we weren't relegated, meaning in this case that we didn't enter the other league due to our points total. We left the SPL and joined the SFL following votes - and votes are no proof of anything other than the opinions of those voting (or their fans). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milton75 Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 53 minutes ago, Bearwithme said: Actually Lord Bannatyne made it clear in the ruling about the bet that Rangers continue, having been sold to the new company. It is correct that we weren't relegated, meaning in this case that we didn't enter the other league due to our points total. We left the SPL and joined the SFL following votes - and votes are no proof of anything other than the opinions of those voting (or their fans). Drivel. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Brees Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 Actually Lord Bannatyne made it clear in the ruling about the bet that Rangers continue, having been sold to the new company.It is correct that we weren't relegated, meaning in this case that we didn't enter the other league due to our points total. We left the SPL and joined the SFL following votes - and votes are no proof of anything other than the opinions of those voting (or their fans). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paralytic Critic Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 1 hour ago, Bearwithme said: Actually Lord Bannatyne made it clear in the ruling about the bet that Rangers continue, having been sold to the new company. It is correct that we weren't relegated, meaning in this case that we didn't enter the other league due to our points total. We left the SPL and joined the SFL following votes - and votes are no proof of anything other than the opinions of those voting (or their fans). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted March 16, 2017 Share Posted March 16, 2017 Daft question i am sure... but do the ebt side letters say rangers football club plc or just club when it indemnifies the player?If its the former, then different company argument will hold. If its the latter, will we see a massive backtrack on continuity? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.