Jump to content

Walking Down The Halbeath Road


Recommended Posts

Decent enough signing, we may find him out for spells and not able to complete 90 minutes much but if we can get him on the pitch regularly enough he'll be an asset IMO.

I like that signing videos have returned. They aren't up to the top standards that rovers are doing and Montrose did regularly in the past but they are far better than a scarf pic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good signing. Seems like people have learned from whatever went wrong with Wotherspoon last summer. Really good addition to the squad. Adds experience to an area we badly needed it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delighted that the saga is over after a year  🤣

We were crying out for a creative attacking presence and he will do the job if he stays fit. Obviously we still need a goalkeeper but I'd argue a defender and another midfielder should still be brought in 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TheScarf said:

That’s the best signing in the league so far.

While good, that's a bit of a stretch considering some of signings made elsewhere and it's easy to argue kane is a better signing for Dunfermline as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, grumswall said:

While good, that's a bit of a stretch considering some of signings made elsewhere and it's easy to argue kane is a better signing for Dunfermline as well. 

He absolutely pisses this level. If McPake plays him centrally in the number 10 position. 

Im guessing you’re on about the 2 geriatrics Raith signed or the very hot and cold Logan Chalmers at Partick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Just now, TheScarf said:

He absolutely pisses this level. If McPake plays him centrally in the number 10 position. 

Im guessing you’re on about the 2 geriatrics Raith signed or the very hot and cold Logan Chalmers at Partick?

I literally stated kane as one that could be argued as a better signing. Chalmers is a typical winger for this level so hit or miss and never really came in to my thoughts. If they play wotherspoon as a ten, I actually quite rate Todd as well, so once fit I'd expect him to be more involved again. 

If dunfermline are going to ditch the 5/3 at the back and go more 4231, then wotherspoon as a 10 with Hamilton and otoo behind would be very good and a vast improvement on what they had there last season. 

I'm not berating the signing at all, I just don't think it's the best signing in the league so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4-2-3-1 is the way to go with the players we have. I’ll be raging if we go with the same as last year. Other managers have us worked out and we are asking guys to get back and defend who are not able to 

6 defenders and let the other 4 attack without having to worry what’s behind them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TheScarf said:

He absolutely pisses this level. If McPake plays him centrally in the number 10 position. 

Im guessing you’re on about the 2 geriatrics Raith signed or the very hot and cold Logan Chalmers at Partick?

Paul Hanlon is the same age as David Wotherspoon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, D'Jaffo said:

Paul Hanlon is the same age as David Wotherspoon. 

He looks about 70.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On paper Kane and Wotherspoon should bang them in, but can the aging gunslingers play enough games to really make an impact when it matters. or will their injuries.catch up with them..   

Is this McPakes last stand...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Passionate said:

On paper Kane and Wotherspoon should bang them in, but can the aging gunslingers play enough games to really make an impact when it matters. or will their injuries.catch up with them..   

Is this McPakes last stand...

Kane is 29.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...