Jump to content

Lets All Laugh At Rangers Thread


Recommended Posts

So why the need for £1.6 million loans each of the past 3 months? Or did I just assume they happened :1eye

Dont argue with the worlds foremost contracts expert ffs! Dont you know he knows the inner dealings of all finances at Ibrox?

Just like when he confidently predicted a NOMAD, and Ashleys deal wasnt worrh the paper it was written on....apart from the 7 year rights!......Muhohahahaaaaa!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mostly fair points, how bad does that make Hibs and Queen of the South?

In Hibs case, bad enough for them get more points over the 36 games and in the QOTS case, to give you a few thumpings this season....lol. What a nugget!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Hibs case, bad enough for them get more points over the 36 games and in the QOTS case, to give you a few thumpings this season....lol. What a nugget!

Both sides really fancied beating Rangers over 2 legs in the play offs, just have a look back at some of the comments on here ya mug. Neither managed it, despite how they performed in the league games.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

£6.5M in the accounts and PM announced that this had reduced by a further £0.3M in the first 6 months of this season.

Wow!

That's a crazy amount of money no matter which way you look at it.

Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is crazy when you look at the results, but 26% of turnover is one of the lowest player to turnover figures around, should be completely manageable, time will tell if the new board are able to reduce the more wasteful cost bases that they inherited.

Except you have about a dozen players out of contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both sides really fancied beating Rangers over 2 legs in the play offs, just have a look back at some of the comments on here ya mug. Neither managed it, despite how they performed in the league games.

And???????????????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whose wages are included in the figure, so yes the player wage to turnover is probably closer to 13%

So not replacing them then?..also I like the way they ignore boardroom wages in these figures, as if it's just the players wagers that count.

I wonder what the % would be if they added all the board members and c***s on gardening leave?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both sides really fancied beating Rangers over 2 legs in the play offs, just have a look back at some of the comments on here ya mug. Neither managed it, despite how they performed in the league games.

6-1 Wallguarder lol

No Surrender

Rab

Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...