robo2 Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 (edited) Where is The_Kincardine when you need him. Mental gymnastics you say? Well, here goes; Answer the following basics. Q. Has your club ever employed players? Q. Has your club ever owned an asset e.g. a stadium? Rob. If your answer to either is 'Yes' then you've got a problem and you'll need some mental gymnastics. If your answer is "No", then your club is something akin to a brand or licence arrangement or even a franchise. Just think, NewRangers could well be the 'Kentucky Fried Chicken' of Scottish football. Yours aDONis the club employed players and owned a stadium pre 1899 when a different structure was in place, after this point the club created a company to do this, at no point after 1899 have we been without a company to do this, we changed companies in 2012 and remained the same club according to all the legal experts who commented on it - an absolutely easy answer from me backed up with proof - what possible reason did you have for thinking this question was even remotely challenging? Edited September 9, 2015 by robo2 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 the club employed players and owned a stadium pre 1899 when a different structure was in place, after this point the club created a company to do this, at no point after 1899 have we been without a company to do this, we changed companies in 2012 and remained the same club according to all the legal experts who commented on it - an absolutely easy answer from me backed up with proof - what possible reason did you have for thinking this question was even remotely challenging? In 1899 the club became a company with the word club in it's name. In 2012 the company which had the word club in it's name went into liquidation and another company which was soon to have the words club and Rangers in it's name was incorporated as Sevco5088 but this company was never a club prior to 2012. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 (edited) the club employed players and owned a stadium pre 1899 when a different structure was in place, after this point the club created a company to do this, at no point after 1899 have we been without a company to do this, we changed companies in 2012 and remained the same club according to all the legal experts who commented on it - an absolutely easy answer from me backed up with proof - what possible reason did you have for thinking this question was even remotely challenging? The club created a company? Stop it! Edited September 9, 2015 by dave.j 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 away and read up on it you thick timmy twat beacuse posts like this, show you have absolutely no clue how companies work Enlighten us all on how clubs work then... Unincorporated and incorporated 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 neither of them suffered a similar fate to rangers, no-one attempted to buy ardrie or fiorentina, leeds, hearts and a number of other english clubs transferred the club to a newco and liquidated the oldco and continued on as usual without a peep about them being a new club. which was an identical situation to rangers There might have been offers for Airdrie, Fiorentina, Leeds or Hearts if the prospective buyers thought they could buy the assets without having to take on the debts at the same time. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
energyzone Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 The club created a company?!!! No, the club became a company. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 The club created a company?!!! No, the club became a company. I think the club created a company line is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. The governing bodies changed the rule book, to create the club/entity, rule. Rangers didn't pre-empt it, predicting they would do that! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambos Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Nae history nae trophies and a manager with the name of a bread 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Nae history nae trophies and a manager with the name of a bread You've got to loaf 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyWellFan Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Apologies if this has already been posted. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=De6FOyEY85A What a seething collection of cretins I can only imagine the utter despair that some of these c***s have felt throughout the last four years 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 (edited) I can only imagine the utter despair that some of these c***s have felt throughout the last four years You'd ken, Mikey. You've been an enthusiastic follower of 'our journey'. Not many posters have been as committed to Rangers as you Edited September 10, 2015 by The_Kincardine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 (edited) Ally got his cash.Seasons over snaffy.Sorry. Misread that. Edited September 10, 2015 by bennett 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Apologies if this has already been posted. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=De6FOyEY85A What a seething collection of cretins I can only imagine the utter despair that some of these c***s have felt throughout the last four years If the company's debts have nothing to do with the club , why are the crying? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 If the company's debts have nothing to do with the club , why are the crying? The previously banned Kingy posting about his big team. Again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 The previously banned Kingy posting about his big team. Again. It's not called being banned. It is becoming "it" in hunt the alias. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Apologies if this has already been posted. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=De6FOyEY85A What a seething collection of cretins I can only imagine the utter despair that some of these c***s have felt throughout the last four years And, despite their defiant sloganeering and deflection on the likes of P&B, have felt, are feeling, and will feel for the rest of their lives. Fucking lovely. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 If the company's debts have nothing to do with the club , why are the crying? And, despite their defiant sloganeering and deflection on the likes of P&B, have felt, are feeling, and will feel for the rest of their lives. Kingy and Norman. united in not posting about their own club......or should that be clubs? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aDONisSheep Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 (edited) Kingy and Norman. united in not posting about their own club......or should that be clubs? In fairness to them, they are not in denial about their "clubs" [plural] Edited September 10, 2015 by aDONisSheep 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 In fairness to them, they are not in denial about their "clubs" [plural] Actually that's not entirely true..... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aDONisSheep Posted September 11, 2015 Share Posted September 11, 2015 the club employed players and owned a stadium pre 1899 when a different structure was in place, after this point the club created a company to do this, at no point after 1899 have we been without a company to do this, we changed companies in 2012 and remained the same club according to all the legal experts who commented on it - an absolutely easy answer from me backed up with proof - what possible reason did you have for thinking this question was even remotely challenging? Well that's not true now, is it. Unincorporated clubs have no legal personality. So I repeat, they can't enter into contracts. The individuals that come together to form the club, have to take on legal responsibility. The very best you could hope for is that Moses (no not that one) and his brother Pete etc set up a trust. But they would have been responsible for the trust not the club, because.... That's right unincorporated clubs can't own assets, enter into contracts, be sued etc. So I'm now at a loss to understand how Mo', Petey, Dozy, Sleapy, Beaky, Mick and Tich, (the Founding fathers) managed it. Yours aDONis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.