Bishop Briggs Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 On 09/01/2019 at 18:21, ajwffc said: It will now be March at the earliest before Spurs an use their new Stadium. With calls from a number of fans (Arsenal and Chelsea mostly) and at least one petition for them to get a points deduction It's petition to ask the FA to deduct points from their tenant for paying a few months extra rent! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 It will now be March at the earliest before Spurs an use their new Stadium. With calls from a number of fans (Arsenal and Chelsea mostly) and at least one petition for them to get a points deduction When we had to stage a couple more games at Murrayfield than originally intended there were similar calls on here from weird malcontents 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boulderdomb Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 Really great stuff and shows that the entirety of Scottish football is on the up 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Planning permission granted tonight for Luton Town to start building their new stadium at Power Court https://www.lutontown.co.uk/news/2019/january/power-court-approved/?fbclid=IwAR1LcXzRG6i0jGO5w2K6q3kmUdU4OfdVr6U10_dT1d5zZHFr_tjy4Cji5hg Not quite finished with the planning stages as later this month the associated mixed use development at Newlands Court has its planning control meeting. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamamafegan Posted January 16, 2019 Author Share Posted January 16, 2019 Planning permission granted tonight for Luton Town to start building their new stadium at Power Courthttps://www.lutontown.co.uk/news/2019/january/power-court-approved/?fbclid=IwAR1LcXzRG6i0jGO5w2K6q3kmUdU4OfdVr6U10_dT1d5zZHFr_tjy4Cji5hg Not quite finished with the planning stages as later this month the associated mixed use development at Newlands Court has its planning control meeting. Wow, the design looks incredible - almost European or something. What capacity is it to be? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 7 minutes ago, jamamafegan said: Wow, the design looks incredible - almost European or something. What capacity is it to be? Initally 17,500 with the application covering expansion up to 23k. Current capacity at KR is just over 10k. Also to include a music venue with capacity of 1800, hotel, supermarket, housing, small cinema. link The associated retail/leisure development at Newlands has been a hot topic due to objections from the owners of the town centre mall. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bud1876 Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Looks very nice.Will look right out of place in the shitehole that is Luton 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ah-dee Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 Wow, the design looks incredible - almost European or something. What capacity is it to be?agree with you it looks very smart. great to see a design thats not just a generic bowl 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brummie Clyde Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 Glad they're moving from Kenilworth Road, as we always lost there. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 (edited) I like this view of the new Luton stadium. Not sure about the floodlights though. Edited January 21, 2019 by Bishop Briggs 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonS Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 On 27/12/2018 at 13:11, GNU_Linux said: Plans for Meadowbank re-development On 27/12/2018 at 14:19, Rodhull said: Surprised they're still planning to go ahead with this. The site has sat dormant for so long now I think most people assumed it was just a matter of time before it'd be announced it was going to be turned into flats. On 27/12/2018 at 20:40, Ayrshire-SFC said: What will Edinburgh city do in way of spectator area for games that would draw over 500? Seems like there is no standing areas around the pitch aside from the seated area Are Edinburgh City planning on moving back to Meadowbank? Last I heard was the statement from February 2018 below, and there's nothing more recent on their website about it: "Edinburgh City Football Club has been one of the principal users of Meadowbank over the past twenty-one years and, indeed, it was during this time that the Club secured its historic promotion to the Scottish Professional Football League. Whilst representatives of the Club have met with City of Edinburgh Council on a number of occasions to discuss the proposed redevelopment of Meadowbank, the planning application submitted to the Council does not, as it currently stands, reflect the requirements of a Member Club of the Scottish Professional Football League or the Club’s aspirations for the future. In particular, the proposed 500 capacity spectator stand and single turnstile are insufficient to accommodate the level of attendance which has been achieved at many of the Club’s home League and Cup games in recent seasons. Furthermore, it is the Club’s view that the provision of just three rows of seating will offer a very poor viewing experience for spectators, while there is no obvious provision of a pitch perimeter barrier separating the spectator stand from the running track and playing field. The proposed changing facilities for players and match officials are also of concern and do not reflect the space requirements of modern day Professional Football Clubs and refereeing teams. In addition, the failure to provide standalone changing facilities for players and match officials would result in them mixing with other Sports Centre users in the circulation areas before, during and after games which is simply not practical. In closing, the Club would be happy to discuss its concerns with Officers at a mutually convenient time, however unless significant amendments are made to the current proposals it is highly unlikely that the Club would be in a position to return to the new Meadowbank at the end of its current ground share agreement with Spartans Community Football Academy at Ainslie Park Stadium." http://www.edinburghcityfc.com/2018/02/14/club-statement-meadowbank-stadium-redevelopment/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the jambo-rocker Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 11 hours ago, Bishop Briggs said: I like this view of the new Luton stadium. Not sure about the floodlights though. It looks like an uneven knock-off of Millwall's "The Den" and worse lights. Fair props for trying something different, but I find it revolting. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boulderdomb Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 https://www.clydebankfc.com/work-starts-at-holm-park/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thekorean Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 20 minutes ago, GordonS said: Are Edinburgh City planning on moving back to Meadowbank? Last I heard was the statement from February 2018 below, and there's nothing more recent on their website about it: "Edinburgh City Football Club has been one of the principal users of Meadowbank over the past twenty-one years and, indeed, it was during this time that the Club secured its historic promotion to the Scottish Professional Football League. Whilst representatives of the Club have met with City of Edinburgh Council on a number of occasions to discuss the proposed redevelopment of Meadowbank, the planning application submitted to the Council does not, as it currently stands, reflect the requirements of a Member Club of the Scottish Professional Football League or the Club’s aspirations for the future. In particular, the proposed 500 capacity spectator stand and single turnstile are insufficient to accommodate the level of attendance which has been achieved at many of the Club’s home League and Cup games in recent seasons. Furthermore, it is the Club’s view that the provision of just three rows of seating will offer a very poor viewing experience for spectators, while there is no obvious provision of a pitch perimeter barrier separating the spectator stand from the running track and playing field. The proposed changing facilities for players and match officials are also of concern and do not reflect the space requirements of modern day Professional Football Clubs and refereeing teams. In addition, the failure to provide standalone changing facilities for players and match officials would result in them mixing with other Sports Centre users in the circulation areas before, during and after games which is simply not practical. In closing, the Club would be happy to discuss its concerns with Officers at a mutually convenient time, however unless significant amendments are made to the current proposals it is highly unlikely that the Club would be in a position to return to the new Meadowbank at the end of its current ground share agreement with Spartans Community Football Academy at Ainslie Park Stadium." http://www.edinburghcityfc.com/2018/02/14/club-statement-meadowbank-stadium-redevelopment/ Is there any interest in sharing the new Edinburgh Rugby stadium? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 (edited) 19 minutes ago, the jambo-rocker said: It looks like an uneven knock-off of Millwall's "The Den" and worse lights. Fair props for trying something different, but I find it revolting. It's uneven as they design allows for the expansion of the stands behind the goals. The design could be improved but it's lot better than some recent efforts, e.g. Brighton's. Edited January 22, 2019 by Bishop Briggs 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonS Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 22 minutes ago, Bishop Briggs said: It's uneven as they design allows for the expansion of the stands behind the goals. The design could be improved but it's lot better than some recent efforts, e.g. Brighton's. When White Hart Lane was redeveloped in the 90s they left a gap behind and above the north stand for expansion, into which they subsequently built. It's a smart bit of planning. What don't you like about Brighton? I think it look really good. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 I just think that Brighton's stadium is just another boring and soulless bowl. It's stuck in the middle of nowhere. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 14 hours ago, Bishop Briggs said: I like this view of the new Luton stadium. Not sure about the floodlights though. I like the lights and the view but other than that it's just another all seater lego bore. 6 minutes ago, Bishop Briggs said: I just think that Brighton's stadium is just another boring and soulless bowl. It's stuck in the middle of nowhere. Boring and soulless bowl is exactly what it is. Yeuch. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 3 hours ago, Bishop Briggs said: It's uneven as they design allows for the expansion of the stands behind the goals. The design could be improved but it's lot better than some recent efforts, e.g. Brighton's. Building the capacity you require but leaving room to build the capacity you want to require is sensible and it seems to make more sense to leave the gaps at the ends than on the touchline. does anybody know why Falkirk decided to build two ends but only one Touchline stand? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 Just now, topcat(The most tip top) said: Building the capacity you require but leaving room to build the capacity you want to require is sensible and it seems to make more sense to leave the gaps at the ends than on the touchline. does anybody know why Falkirk decided to build two ends but only one Touchline stand? Was it not because the open area was at the time inside the blast radius of the nearby power plant or something along the same lines? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.