Jump to content

The 2016 US Presidential Election


Adamski

Recommended Posts

Are early votes in America counted before election night? It's just I keep hearing reports of Clinton/Trump being however many votes up in certain areas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Looks like the woman who accused Trump of raping her when she was 13 has dropped the case.

Don't think that'll have much if any effect on the election, but one less fire for Trump to fight I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are early votes in America counted before election night? It's just I keep hearing reports of Clinton/Trump being however many votes up in certain areas?



The votes aren't opened but due to the ridiculous system of having to register as Republican, Democrat or Independent in the US it'll be clear however many of each have voted. Obviously that doesn't account for people voting against their affiliation but it's a good indicator.

As you'd expect with a far superior political machine, Clinton appears to be leading for the most part. North Carolina looks like a tough climb for Trump with Republicans not turning out for early voting in the same numbers as they did for Romney. Remember he has to win either NC or Pennsylvania.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



The votes aren't opened but due to the ridiculous system of having to register as Republican, Democrat or Independent in the US it'll be clear however many of each have voted. Obviously that doesn't account for people voting against their affiliation but it's a good indicator.

As you'd expect with a far superior political machine, Clinton appears to be leading for the most part. North Carolina looks like a tough climb for Trump with Republicans not turning out for early voting in the same numbers as they did for Romney. Remember he has to win either NC or Pennsylvania.


Ah that makes sense. System seems utterly ridiculous though when you can tell how many people have voted from what party whilst the election is still on-going.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bit of a let down for people hoping for killer dirt to come out on Hillary from Wikileaks when Assange says this was the biggest story. It was well known that Qatar and the Saudis were aiding the only effective groups against Assad in their proxy regional war against Iran, namely Al Nusra and IS, at least in the early days. They would have been happy to see the Iran backed Shia led Government in Iraq undermined too. All that came out of Wikileaks was that America were piling pressure on them to stop. 


Assange is just doing his usual journalistic publish some facts and let people play join the dots and reach a conclusion that is not necessarily the case.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welsh bairn so deluded and naive it'scomical ,  dee too.  The USA and UK have been arming,  training and funding Alnusra and Iisis for funking years,  it'snot cconspiracy theory it'ssimple fact, lour government and the USA are utterly desperate to intervene on their behalf we would have done so already if it wasn't defeated in parliament, we run a funking media centre for them ffs open your eyes you utter clowns,  we are funding, arming, training ad doing pr for fucking tterrorists.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welsh bairn so deluded and naive it'scomical ,  dee too.  The USA and UK have been arming,  training and funding Alnusra and Iisis for funking years,  it'snot cconspiracy theory it'ssimple fact, lour government and the USA are utterly desperate to intervene on their behalf we would have done so already if it wasn't defeated in parliament, we run a funking media centre for them ffs open your eyes you utter clowns,  we are funding, arming, training ad doing pr for fucking tterrorists.   

You clearly haven't read Conspiracy as Governance that gives a clear description in his own words of Assange's end game.

Assange's goal is not exposing conspiracies but to create paranoia - and he seems to be doing a fine job with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pilig pressure on them to stop that's farcical we bomb the targets they tell us to we have people on the ground working with them we have been running a propaganda campaign on their behalf for years.

 

Last week, LAST FUCKING WEEK, the same 'rebels' who Welsh conveniently describes as the most effective opposition to assad(the legitimate ruler of Syria btw like it or not) used poison gas against civilians.   A fucking week Ago!   Chemical weapons used against civilians by the people we arm, train  support,  fund and want to intervene on behalf of.   Who said this?   Not putin,  not rt,   the un special envoy in Syria.   A week Ago!   Chemical weapons used against Civilians!   Did you see that on thebBBC or cnn?  Did you f**k.   Fucking idiots,  unbelievable.   This is whycClinton is such a danger,  she is going to start ww3,  we are the aggressors here not Russia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who the f**k is talking about assange you absolute weapon open your eyes ffs this is genuine going to end up i  ww3 and hundreds of millions dead, and we will have caused it its our doing, the only sensible conclusion a reasonable person could come to right now is the governments of the UK and USA want that and are trying to make it happen,  that couldn't not be the case given our actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who even invited us into Syria why are we there?   Can anyone answer That? 


Make up your mind, are you not happy about the West bombing IS after what you've said about them? Meanwhile the Russians are leaving them well alone and doing a Grozny on Aleppo.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...