HalfCutNinja Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 Oooh turns out the cultists were full of shit. Who knew? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Sannox Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 44 minutes ago, HalfCutNinja said: Oooh turns out the cultists were full of shit. Who knew? Prepare for the “civic and joyous” to accuse you of being a traitor. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HalfCutNinja Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 4 minutes ago, Glen Sannox said: Prepare for the “civic and joyous” to accuse you of being a traitor. Shut up mate. Your masters in London have spent the last 16 months conducting the largest theft in human history and you'd still crawl over broken glass to lick their boots. 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 Oooh turns out the cultists were full of shit. Who knew? Everyone knew the money was spent - it's about time they just admitted it and moved on. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HalfCutNinja Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 16 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: Everyone knew the money was spent - it's about time they just admitted it and moved on. That's true, but they denied it for months and months, claimed it was 'woven though' the accounts in a patronising lie and derided people who questioned it as conspiracy theorists. Now they admit they have spent it. That's not good enough from the party of government in Scotland and the vehicle for independence. We need and deserve better. Its nothing compared to the tens of billions the UK govt have brazenly stolen from the public purse, which btw genuinely is the largest theft in human history, but its still not good enough. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 Minter hoping for hauners and getting absolutely rinsed. You love to see it [emoji23] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueBear Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 6 hours ago, BFTD said: Since support for independence has ticked over 50% in the polls, there's been a huge increase in lazy burner accounts on here. I think the word is "desperation". Kudos to Stormzy, at least he reanimated his account by warning that he's only here to do shite trolling, so anyone who reads his posts has nobody to blame but themselves. Desperation is what you see happening at the theatre of screams in the east end. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 1 hour ago, BlueBear said: Desperation is what you see happening at the theatre of screams in the east end. Old Firm playpen for this pish 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 Oooh turns out the cultists were full of shit. Who knew? "SNP's new national treasurer releases statement on £600,000 for indyref2 | The National" https://www.thenational.scot/news/19385760.snps-new-national-treasurer-releases-statement-600-000-indyref2/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 31 minutes ago, Baxter Parp said: "SNP's new national treasurer releases statement on £600,000 for indyref2 | The National" https://www.thenational.scot/news/19385760.snps-new-national-treasurer-releases-statement-600-000-indyref2/ Just confirms everything that has been said. Quote Hence a claim from some that the money does not exist. In fact the money is “earmarked” through the internal process set out above and will be deployed fully through future cash flow for the purpose of promoting a referendum on independence and campaigns intended to secure independence The money does not exist. Future cash flow does not exist. Also note that the word ringfenced has been replaced by "earmarked". This statement fools absolutely no-one.with the capacity to think for themselves. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorongil Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 Those who defended the SNP on this particular matter and threw out insults to those expressing doubts should really apologise. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 The money does not exist. Future cash flow does not exist. Also note that the word ringfenced has been replaced by "earmarked". This statement fools absolutely no-one.with the capacity to think for themselves. Even the slanted Times story says "some" (not all) of the money has been used elsewhere. IIRC about £50k. The money exists and the full amount will be spent on a future independence campaign. Earmarked means the same as ringfenced. If it helps. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 If that's true then it should be super easy to print out a bank statement with about 550 grand sitting in it to settle the matter. Have you read the statement? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 1 hour ago, Baxter Parp said: 1 hour ago, TAFKAM said: If that's true then it should be super easy to print out a bank statement with about 550 grand sitting in it to settle the matter. Have you read the statement? Time for you to speak to Monty again. It appears that you struggle to understand basic English as well as financial matters. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawson Park Boy Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 (edited) What I took out of the statement was that the cash is not ringfenced but has been used for other running expenses. However, they say that they will have another fundraiser to replenish the ‘ringfenced fund’. From the 2019 Accounts it is abundantly clear that the cash is just NOT there. It will soon be time to present the 2020 Accounts which will be interesting to view. This may or may not be legal but it is certainly very shabby treatment of the donors who thought they were contributing to an independence fighting fund. Edited June 22, 2021 by Dawson Park Boy Omission 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 1 hour ago, strichener said: Time for you to speak to Monty again. It appears that you struggle to understand basic English as well as financial matters. Ok, have you read the statement? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 2 hours ago, TAFKAM said: Yeah I read it a few days ago and it seemed to be pretty clear they'd spent it and the ringfencing was little more than a commitment to spend 600 grand's worth of party money on indyref at some point. Like I say, it would seem to me to be a very effective way of bringing the matter to a close given the bad press it's generating to present evidence of the money existing. I don't understand why they wouldn't just do this simple thing if it was sitting there unspent. Where did it say that? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtgilphead Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 (edited) 45 minutes ago, Dawson Park Boy said: Stuff Both Scotland & England were playing when DPB posted this. What a football fan! Edited June 22, 2021 by lichtgilphead 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 Ein reich, ein volk. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HalfCutNinja Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 3 hours ago, strichener said: Just confirms everything that has been said. The money does not exist. Future cash flow does not exist. Also note that the word ringfenced has been replaced by "earmarked". This statement fools absolutely no-one.with the capacity to think for themselves. Exactly. Note the sleekit wording too, "or the purpose of promoting a referendum on independence and campaigns intended to secure independence" That's not what it was for, its not the basis upon which they asked for it and not the basis upon which people donated. That money was specifically to fight a referendum campaign not secure one. The SNP have become something very dodgy and dishonest and only the cultists can't see it now. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.