mjw Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Just to add, I reckon as soon as you (and many others on here) see our club' Glasgow Rangers, you'll blindly pigeon hole every single aspect of our every being. Pep is without doubt the most intolerant contributor on these pages, f*fk knows why he hasn't got me on ignore! But you continue to humour him!? Fuzzy afro/pep is a fucking head case .Almost every Indy supporter on here has pointed this out at one time.If it wasn't for posters like yourself engaging with him every day he'd be left arguing with himself.You need a look in the mirror before dishing out telts about other posters on here. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Fuzzy afro/pep is a fucking head case .Almost every Indy supporter on here has pointed this out at one time.If it wasn't for posters like yourself engaging with him every day he'd be left arguing with himself.You need a look in the mirror before dishing out telts about other posters on here. Shall I just pack it in? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Shall I just pack it in? Depression thread for this..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
git-intae-thum Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 42 minutes ago, RedRob72 said: Always room for compromise, Brexit has been a real game changer, but the Union will hold! Union or nowt eh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Depression thread for this..... £150 up after being £250 down and these lads want to call it a night!! No chance, get em dealt!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Union or nowt eh. Can't see it changing, Sorry! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Just to add, I reckon as soon as you (and many others on here) see 'our club' Glasgow Rangers on a forum profile, you'll blindly pigeon hole every single aspect of our every being. Just to add.I use the app,it doesn't display 'your club'. You do that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 So there you have it,rab and his pals would rather see Scotland suffer for a flag 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 23 minutes ago, doulikefish said: So there you have it,rab and his pals would rather see Scotland suffer for a flag I got him to admit that a while ago. It's not news. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 I got him to admit that a while ago. It's not news. 'Admit' what!? That you lads can drape yourselves in a Saltire or Lion Rampant and claim to be 'more Scottish' than the rest of us!? F*ckin pish! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 You don't understand the Unionist resolve then mate, not many on here do! They just take the piss, We're fine with that! Thick, subservient *** 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 12 minutes ago, RedRob72 said: 'Admit' what!? That you lads can drape yourselves in a Saltire or Lion Rampant and claim to be 'more Scottish' than the rest of us!? F*ckin pish! Who has claimed here that they're "more Scottish" by virtue of not opposing Scottish statehood and sovereignty in the way anti-Scottish statehood British nationalists do? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Thick, subservient *** Content and prosperous, it's clear you're struggling a wee bit Jupe, ever tried any breathing exercises? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Who has claimed here that they're "more Scottish" by virtue of not opposing Scottish statehood and sovereignty in the way anti-Scottish statehood British nationalists do? You exemplify the point, whose anti-Scottish? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Content and prosperous, it's clear you're struggling a wee bit Jupe, ever tried any breathing exercises? Nope, just treating your tired servile pish with respect it deserves. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 8 minutes ago, RedRob72 said: You exemplify the point, whose anti-Scottish? I never said you were anti Scottish, I said you were anti-Scottish statehood. Now, again, who here has claimed to be "more Scottish" by virtue of supporting rather than opposing Scottish statehood? (Try not to avoid the question by answering it with another question) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Nope, just treating your tired servile pish with respect it deserves. It's a quiet confidence Jupe, you're looking at a 3 wood when I'm using a pitching wedge! [emoji6] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 I never said you were anti Scottish, I said you were anti-Scottish statehood. Now, again, who here has claimed to be "more Scottish" by virtue of supporting rather than opposing Scottish statehood? (Try not to avoid the question by answering it with another question) Sorry, I don't understand the question, please can you clarify? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 3 minutes ago, RedRob72 said: Sorry, I don't understand the question, please can you clarify? I'm sure you do, but let's try again anyway (not that you'll answer). Who here has claimed that being in support of Scottish statehood makes one "more Scottish" than those, like yourself, who are vehemently opposed to Scottish statehood and instead committed to British statehood? I can break out puppets and put on a show if that would help you understand the question. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearbuyerbell Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Rob is an emotive No voter, we get it, absolutely nothing will change his nationalistic approach to this subject. Going round in circles for the next three years wont get him to change his mind. Moving forward, I was wanting to ask everyone ( including Rob) whether it would be in the best interests of Yes to be a broad church of views, or one singular vision ? I'm linking this up from Peter A Bell: At the time Yes Scotland was set up, I wholly approved of the separation of the SNP and the rest of the Yes movement. I have been forced to reconsider in the light of subsequent developments. Not that I'm saying it was a mistake. At the time, it seemed like the sensible thing to do. And it was probably necessary. Then! But this is now. The next independence referendum campaign WILL NOT be simply a rerun of the first one. We have the benefit of experience now. It would be stupid not to take advantage of what we have learned - both from our own campaign and from the anti-independence effort. They won. Something they did was effective. Let's learn from that. With hindsight we can see that the, sometimes very forceful, shunning of the SNP by the rest of the Yes campaign played right into the British establishment's demonising of the party. Because independence is inevitably and irrevocably associated with the SNP, we were effectively asking people to vote for them in one breath and saying we wanted nothing to do with them in the next. Separating the SNP and the Yes movement was a mistake. It created a weak spot which the British state - ever the masters of divide and rule - were able to take advantage of. With many on the Yes side showing themselves all too willing to be used. We must not make the same mistake again. The entire Yes campaign must embrace the SNP, not as a political party, but as the de facto political arm of the independence movement. The British nationalists will attack the SNP because they know that this is the most effective way to undermine the whole independence movement. As they did before, they will completely ignore the other pro-independence parties (OPIP) and organisations such as Labour for Independence and Women for Independence unless and until they can be used against the SNP. They will completely disregard everything people like Patrick Harvie say unless and until they say something that can be spun as a 'blow' to Nicola Sturgeon. That's realpolitik. We may not like it. But we're not going to change it. Certainly not in time for the coming campaign. Learning the lessons from all of this we must present a united front. Instead of joining in with the anti-SNP rhetoric, everybody in the Yes campaign should be defending the SNP to the very best of their ability. And if they can't, then they should just keep quiet. It simply makes no sense to damage the tool you need to get the job done. A lot of people don't like to hear this. Even as I write it, I'm not comfortable with it myself. In normal circumstances this kind of 'devotion' to a political party would be anathema to me. But these are not normal circumstances. So I urge everyone who is unequivocally and unconditionally committed to the cause of independence to avoid the customary knee-jerk reaction and just think about what I'm saying. If bringing our government home is important - which it certainly is - then it is surely worth the relatively small effort - sacrifice, if you will - of putting aside personal animosities, policy agendas and partisan loyalties for a year or so in order to win the prize" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.