Jump to content

Bombing Syria


ICTJohnboy

Recommended Posts

I'm getting so pissed off listening to Corbyn spelling out all kinds of dire consequences in the event of a yes to bombing vote. The result is more or less a foregone conclusion anyway.

Yesterday he had the power to avert that by whipping his party into a no vote - but no, he couldn't run the risk of inflicting further damage on his already discredited, divided party.

So much for his principals the man is a pathetic waste of space

That's way too harsh.

He's stuck between a rock and a hard place.

The whip system is a necessary evil in British democracy. MPs were elected to come to decisions, not to follow blindly whatever the leadership wants.

He's making the case as strongly as he can and at the same time trying to get control of the parliamentary party. What he's trying to do is incredibly difficult (herding right wing cats) and will take years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tories will put party before logic and rationale country.

Labour MPs will put their own perceived self interest, entrenched right wing politics and hatred of Corbyn before logic and rationale.

I hope these c***s get deselected in the dirtiest sort of infighting imaginable.

Understand now why I want Labour to die?

Plenty of good people in the party, I know a few who desperately want to help those less fortunate, improve their community etc, they are not too different from me actually. But the party is no longer fit for purpose, it's not a political party at the moment and it certainly no longer represents the working man.

Time for it to be put out of its misery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's way too harsh.

He's stuck between a rock and a hard place.

The whip system is a necessary evil in British democracy. MPs were elected to come to decisions, not to follow blindly whatever the leadership wants.

He's making the case as strongly as he can and at the same time trying to get control of the parliamentary party. What he's trying to do is incredibly difficult (herding right wing cats) and will take years.

If people of any political persuasion want to be Parliamentarians but don't want to be subject to the whip system then there's an easy answer, stand as an independent. But don't get elected on a party political ticket and then start complaining about the way in which party politics operate.

He also has absolutely no moral authority to whip anyone

What utter rubbish. He has just recently been elected as a party leader through an exhaustive ballot system; that gives him the moral authority within his party.

I would imagine most if not all CLPs have a position on this issue; I'd love to see any MP who votes in favour of air strikes against their CLP's position deselected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Understand now why I want Labour to die?

Plenty of good people in the party, I know a few who desperately want to help those less fortunate, improve their community etc, they are not too different from me actually. But the party is no longer fit for purpose, it's not a political party at the moment and it certainly no longer represents the working man.

Time for it to be put out of its misery.

Very easy and simplified position to take from a Scottish perspective, not from a UK one. Whilst I want independence I am not presently immune to the politics of rUK; for that matter neither will an independent Scotland be when that time comes.

The Labour Party membership has just recently shown that they are heading in the right direction by electing the only candidate who was not an establishment clone, there biggest problem was that the candidate in question is lacking in many qualities.

I would agree that many Labour MPs don't represent the working man (and woman) but it will be easier to reform the party at grass roots level than to knock it down and start again.

I can understand why so many folk in Scotland are anti-Labour, I am one of them, but don't underestimate the impact or the intent of the ordinary party member who put their faith in Corbyn despite the demonisation of him and the open threats of the probable splits during the leadership election. Maybe he will prove he doesn't have the calibre but the membership have issued a clear statement of intent by electing him in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He also has absolutely no moral authority to whip anyone

A pretty untenable position for a leader in a parliamentary democracy in which the party whip has a central role.

It's a bit like being a lorry driver without a license, or a teacher who is not allowed to discipline pupils in any way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very easy and simplified position to take from a Scottish perspective, not from a UK one. Whilst I want independence I am not presently immune to the politics of rUK; for that matter neither will an independent Scotland be when that time comes.

The Labour Party membership has just recently shown that they are heading in the right direction by electing the only candidate who was not an establishment clone, there biggest problem was that the candidate in question is lacking in many qualities.

I would agree that many Labour MPs don't represent the working man (and woman) but it will be easier to reform the party at grass roots level than to knock it down and start again.

I can understand why so many folk in Scotland are anti-Labour, I am one of them, but don't underestimate the impact or the intent of the ordinary party member who put their faith in Corbyn despite the demonisation of him and the open threats of the probable splits during the leadership election. Maybe he will prove he doesn't have the calibre but the membership have issued a clear statement of intent by electing him in the first place.

And a very naive belief that labour will reform itself. It won't, it can't, you see it every day with the infighting.

It's no longer fit for purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What utter rubbish. He has just recently been elected as a party leader through an exhaustive ballot system; that gives him the moral authority within his party.

I would imagine most if not all CLPs have a position on this issue; I'd love to see any MP who votes in favour of air strikes against their CLP's position deselected.

No. That gives him the constitutional authority.

The moral authority to whip anyone was ceded by his continued and sustained voting against his party leadership over the previous decade.

I don't think he was wrong to do so but for his supporters not to recognise and plan for this as a future issue lies somewhere between naive and cretinous.

Also,CLPs don't get to be autonomous on policy. They send delegates to national conference to make policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't a personal dig btw, reread it and it kind of comes across as that, so just making myself clear.

Plenty of folk out there that believe that labour will somehow find its soul again, but as I said, it ain't happening.

There's a mass of 'solid working class' people o'er the Tweed that are desperate for proper party, I genuinely feel for them.

But the actual party itself?

Get tae f**k.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If people of any political persuasion want to be Parliamentarians but don't want to be subject to the whip system then there's an easy answer, stand as an independent. But don't get elected on a party political ticket and then start complaining about the way in which party politics operate.

What utter rubbish. He has just recently been elected as a party leader through an exhaustive ballot system; that gives him the moral authority within his party.

I would imagine most if not all CLPs have a position on this issue; I'd love to see any MP who votes in favour of air strikes against their CLP's position deselected.

Do you think MPs should always vote with the party when whipped to do so?

Invergowrie arab made the other point for me. Corbyn broke rank enough times to realise he can't judge others for doing the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think MPs should always vote with the party when whipped to do so?

Invergowrie arab made the other point for me. Corbyn broke rank enough times to realise he can't judge others for doing the same.

Agreed.

How can someone expect loyalty when he himself has been disloyal in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was asked this question when I went through vetting a while back - would I vote against the party.

I said that I would argue my case in private behind closed doors, but at the end off the day, it is a group decision and that is that even if it goes against you.

If the community you represent are completely against a course of action etc, you are allowed to abstain.

Yes, you are allowed to abstain in the SNP despite what you may think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...