RedRob72 Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Victim FC. Nonsense, I couldn't give two f*cks mate, I couldnae give a shite what they sing or chant about us, just don't pretend it all flows from our support, it doesn't!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Nonsense, I couldn't give two f*cks mate, I couldnae give a shite what they sing or chant about us, just don't pretend it all flows from our support, it doesn't!! Yes, your post came across as you not giving two fucks. Not. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Yes, your post came across as you not giving two fucks. Not. Aye, crack on with with it, it's pointless blaming one club. I don't give 2 F*cks, I've got used to the shite we get! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 I seriously dont think its limited to one club. There are about 4/5 clubs in scotland i can think of off the top of my head with an issue with sectarianism in seniors and plenty in the juniors. Name the senior clubs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Name the senior clubs. I look forward to his response too. If he mentions either Dundee club then he's as about as accurate as a blind man pinning the donkey's tail. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yank Mike Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 (edited) If I can wade into the incest discussion for a second: People don't have to have an ideologically rigid vision of the world. You can believe that consenting adults should generally be allowed to do as they want. You can also believe that certain actions are so repugnant to our society that they should be banned. This is the way most people look at the world. They don't view every single issue through a consistent liberal/libertarian/socialist/racist/fascist/whatever prism in order to decide what they believe. There's nothing wrong with this. It is normal. The weird people are the ones who can't get past the logic, "We believe that consenting adults should be allowed to do as they please so go ahead and f**k your sister. It's your life. More power to you." The end result of this extreme logic is that 50 year old Canadian man who left his family to be adopted by another family and live as a transgender 6 year old girl. Edited May 21, 2016 by Yank Mike -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScotSquid Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 (edited) I look forward to his response too. If he mentions either Dundee club then he's as about as accurate as a blind man pinning the donkey's tail.I think things have changed latterly. Both Dundee and Falkirk in the 1980s and 90s had plenty of *** without busfare types.They probably still do, but its just far less vocal now, and changed a bit as the gap between Rangers and Falkirk narrowed . There's still plenty of guys who 'support their local team' whilst admitting they 'like to see Rangers doing well'. There was always a noticeably more vocal hatred of visiting Celtic sides than Rangers when Falkirk were at Brockville. Don't see that now really at Westfield. Edited May 21, 2016 by ScotSquid 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 Oaksoft's in a bad mood this morning. I predict sentences littered with innapropriate capitilisation of individual words by 3:00pm, short term memory loss by 6:30pm and a full on mental breakdown by midnight. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 And can the rest of us predict more posts where you shove your head as far up Strichener backside as possible? I've never met the man! I will side with whoever is talking the most sense, obviously IMO, though. That's very rarely you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 No there is more to it than that. Thats two threads where he has demonstrably twisted what different posters have said and you still havent twigged either of them. If you think that then that's your prerogative. Certainly, the one thing I won't do is try to change your mind because you're an obstinate imbecile who lacks the capacities of contrition, reasoning and self awareness. You're only good for prodding and laughing at. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 Ffs oaksoft. Do just argue with everyone??? I suggest xanax 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 You are doing it again. I told you repeatedly it wasnt just my words you were wilfully twisting. This is something you do again and again to other posters. The only thing I cant fathom out is whether you are deliberately doing it or whether you genuinely lack the intelligence to know you are doing it. You can either agree with Ad Lib or not as regards to whether incest should be illegal but he clearly did NOT express a view of being FOR incest. Maybe you are just winding him up but most reasonable peole can see what your game is. Sorry, I won't highlight either your stupidity or hypocrisy again. One again apologies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon EF Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 Well done you! However, I have not used the word accepting and neither has Ad Lib. So perhaps you can clarify where this post is directed. I see lots of instances of people advocating that things that they find unacceptable, that are currently a criminal offence, to be decriminalised. Well accepting is pretty closely related to 'acceptable'. E.g. if you find something acceptable, you are accepting of it. I don't think anything I don't like or wouldn't encourage others to do needs to be criminalised. You can advocate for drugs to be decriminalised without advocating for everyone to take drugs. Again, they're just just different things by definition. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 Well accepting is pretty closely related to 'acceptable'. E.g. if you find something acceptable, you are accepting of it. I don't think anything I don't like or wouldn't encourage others to do needs to be criminalised. You can advocate for drugs to be decriminalised without advocating for everyone to take drugs. Again, they're just just different things by definition. Would you advocate for drugs to be decriminalised and then find it unacceptable for people to take drugs? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 I think things have changed latterly. Both Dundee and Falkirk in the 1980s and 90s had plenty of *** without busfare types. They probably still do, but its just far less vocal now, and changed a bit as the gap between Rangers and Falkirk narrowed . There's still plenty of guys who 'support their local team' whilst admitting they 'like to see Rangers doing well'. There was always a noticeably more vocal hatred of visiting Celtic sides than Rangers when Falkirk were at Brockville. Don't see that now really at Westfield. Apart from a short spell in the early 70s when being a hooligan was all the rage - and a minority of Dundee fans (ironically some being Catholic) decided to ape Rangers fans - most Dees fans I've come across hate the pair them. If there is any bias it is actually usually towards Celtic - many Catholics like myself would have followed them as young bairns - only to see the light and support their hometown team when they got older - usually after getting taken (like I was) to my first match at Dens. The same is true for United - yes they may have been formed from the original Dundee Hibs BUT the sectarian element never went to United (but to Harp). Anyone who wants to read about the true non-sectarian background to the Dundee clubs should check out Jm Wilkie's "ACROSS THE GREAT DIVIDE:A History of Professional Football in Dundee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 Dundee fans have always being disgustingly sectarian. The "Derry" End. Oh dear oh dear. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 (edited) Dundee fans have always being disgustingly sectarian. The "Derry" End. Oh dear oh dear. Oh deary Libby you need to try harder. Edited May 21, 2016 by DeeTillEhDeh 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtgilphead Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 Dundee fans have always being disgustingly sectarian. The "Derry" End. Oh dear oh dear. The ends at Dens were the "TC Keay" (after the factory behind it) and the "Provvy" (after Provost Road, which runs behind it) HTH 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 The ends at Dens were the "TC Keay" (after the factory behind it) and the "Provvy" (after Provost Road, which runs behind it) HTH He's typical luvvy Thistle fan - doesn't actually go to games. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 The ends at Dens were the "TC Keay" (after the factory behind it) and the "Provvy" (after Provost Road, which runs behind it) HTH Someone wasn't on the First Division forums circa 6-7 years ago. Don't be a bore. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.