Jump to content

Motherwell FC - A Thread For All Seasons


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Casagolda said:

I think O'Donnell's probably came in for some harsh criticism at times based on peoples expectations of him rather than his actual performances for Motherwell. 

He's a decent Scottish Premiership right back, that's about it and that's largely what he's been for us. Would ideally like him to stay but if he can wangle himself a lucrative deal out of Celtic or some Championship mob then fair play to him. Would leave us short in the full back area again though, especially as Grimshaw seems to have disappeared in recent weeks.

I'm not going as far as saying he's rubbish. He's very average. The recent Rangers game was his first good game in months. 

As @Busta Nut's said. If Celtic try to stop Rangers by pinning their defensive hopes on him I'll absolutely piss my pants. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given how Grimshaw was playing at the start of the season O'Donnell's come in and been...fine? I'd say he's improved us based on where we were without necessarily screaming 'International Footballer'.

I don't think anyone's ever been under the illusion that his situation is very much of convenience; we needed a full back as the one we had went off a cliff, he lives 5 minutes away and needed minutes to keep ticking over for his international aspirations.

It's not a criticism of him because, as I say, the arrangement with SOD has been pretty clear but in a way his 'one foot out the door' status has kind of been indicative of the malaise and general funk that's been around the team this season.

Of our regular-ish starting XI at least half have contracts expiring in the summer (unless there are any other 'plot twist' clauses like Gallagher's).

Edited by capt_oats
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly if Celtic are pinning their future title hopes on Gallagher & O'Donnell I'll be piling money on Rangers to win the league for the next couple of years. 


I agree that he’s not the level of player they should be pinning their hopes on if they want to start winning leagues again, and I wouldn’t expect them to make him a key player or anything like that, but they could do worse (see Laxalt) than get a Scotland international in as a filler for 6 months and as a reliable squad player next year.

Fingers crossed he stays because I’m not the biggest Grimshaw fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Gianfranco said:

Was flicking through Twitter and Scott Burns has us trying to get a 34 year old midfielder from St Mirren called Foley. I don’t recall the guy at all tbh but Scott Burns is usually right. It was in the Record.

See what you told us about Tait when we came in to sign him? Well it's the same here. Rather than re-write I'll quote what I wrote in our thread..

To anyone looking in from the outside they must see Foley as a pretty solid addition to their squad. Experienced, somewhat versatile, unlikely to be on high wages and (presumably) desperate to get some game time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Gianfranco said:

Was flicking through Twitter and Scott Burns has us trying to get a 34 year old midfielder from St Mirren called Foley. I don’t recall the guy at all tbh but Scott Burns is usually right. It was in the Record.

 I'm guessing he might be a replacement for Crawford if we're not renewing his loan?

I have no idea who Kyle Gunn is but it seems Foley's the St Mirren club captain.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sam Foley was great for them last season.
St. Mirren making weird choices at the moment, imo.
Without wanting to write the guy off like the Well fans with Tait, his legs appear to have gone after the lockdown break.

He was superb last season but doesn't have the same hussle about him this season. He hasn't started a game for quite a while. We vastly improved when he was taken out the team, sadly. Quite a likeable player too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...