Benjamin_Nevis Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 1 minute ago, The_Kincardine said: So are you saying this hasn't been discussed on The BRALT? I couldn't give a solitary f**k tbh. I've hardly bothered with it for months. Still, you seem rattled yet again, which is pleasing. Try not to report anyone tonight though, you utter mess 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerberus Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 I can't believe I clicked on that. "Absolutely thick as f**k and obsessed with Rangers" should be the slogan of the Daily Record. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 3 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: So are you saying this hasn't been discussed on The BRALT wherein it hasn't been seen as a newco/oldco debate? It's been seen in those terms by some and resolutely not by some others. Your wish to denigrate "diddies" as a homogeneous group is utterly pathetic. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 17, 2017 Author Share Posted January 17, 2017 (edited) 8 minutes ago, jupe1407 said: Still, you seem rattled You may say much about me but I can't think I've ever "rattled" anything. Edited January 17, 2017 by The_Kincardine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grass Is Greener. Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 25 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: "72-year old Albert Kinloch of Simshill Road, Glasgow" is EveryDiddy. Absolutely thick as f**k and obsessed with Rangers. We have, of course, done this to death on The Big Thread with the added relish of it being seen as a newco/oldco shibboleth. Offt. P&B seems to be getting the better of The *** these days. What an absolute shambles. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 Not surprisingly you're posting the usual diddy dreck. Pretty-much every Rangers fan on here is a Mr Micawber and wants a balanced budget. On here probably. Not on many of the other forums where you hear people's opinions - pub, Facebook, work and/or Walter Smith's comments and various other places. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 17, 2017 Author Share Posted January 17, 2017 6 minutes ago, Dindeleux said: On here probably. Not on many of the other forums where you hear people's opinions - pub, Facebook, work and/or Walter Smith's comments and various other places. It seems entirely sensible to judge such matters based on posts from P&B? No? This is our forum after all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 8 hours ago, The_Kincardine said: It seems entirely sensible to judge such matters based on posts from P&B? No? This is our forum after all. And we shouldn't discuss what's going on in the real world? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 You are, as usual, a fucking dribbling wreck. Your overuse of "diddy" and "diddies" is quite interesting though. It implies some hilariously misplaced sense of superiority, which considering that you're little more than an aging drunk *** with ridiculously awful patter, is a tad unfortunate. Best wishes for tomorrow's hangover. Has he not before that hes around 50 years old? Imagine being that age, steaming every night, and using an anonymous message board to use your b*****dised club to try and gain some form of superiority that you can get in real life as you're an old alkie. Bewildering. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 His constant reference to 'diddies' when anyone says something he doesn't like says far more about him than it does any of us unfortunately. It also belittles his self-portrayal as a pseudo-intelligent individual. Given his automatic response to anything is 'diddies' it simply highlights he'd rather get involved in petty squabbles instead of actually engaging in debate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tree house tam Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Oh dear Kincardine. This *** is broken, this *** is broken, sorrow, sorrow, sorrroooooow, sorrooooowww. Thank you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shootingboots Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 When's Dave King opening his war chest? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Found this little beauty. Spotify kens. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grass Is Greener. Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 1 hour ago, Rugster said: Oh dear Kincardine. This *** is broken, this *** is broken, sorrow, sorrow, sorrroooooow, sorrooooowww. Thank you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 18, 2017 Author Share Posted January 18, 2017 7 hours ago, The DA said: And we shouldn't discuss what's going on in the real world? Hey you're following tweets from a Celtic fan about a spat between a bookie and a punter and think it has something to do with Rangers' status as a club. You're in no position to hand our "real world" lectures! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 It seems entirely sensible to judge such matters based on posts from P&B? Only if you are a complete loser. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Given his automatic response to anything is 'diddies' it simply highlights he'd rather get involved in petty squabbles instead of actually engaging in debate. Very much this.For a change on a Sevco thread I'd tried to discuss football and the challenges faced at Ibrox. I'm pretty sure Kinc has been the very poster who has been saying we should post more about football matters. The fact that he has came back with the diddy response just confirms, as per my previous post, that he is one of life's losers and it's no surprise he finds (temporary) solace at the bottom of a bottle. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 59 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: Hey you're following tweets from a Celtic fan about a spat between a bookie and a punter and think it has something to do with Rangers' status as a club. You're in no position to hand our "real world" lectures! Doleman's club preference is irrelevant - he seems to be posting every couple of minutes so it looks unlikely that he's editing out the bits he doesn't like. The evidence led, and the judge's assessment of same, could be very interesting. If Coral submit that Rangers are a new club and therefore couldn't have been relegated and the judge goes on to find in their favour, we would appear to have some kind of resolution of the long-standing question of continuity. In practice, though, it's been a bit disappointing. Coral seem to be a tad apprehensive about going balls-out on that approach. Just how much money do they make from Rangers fans? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordHawHaw Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 (edited) 28 minutes ago, The DA said: The evidence led, and the judge's assessment of same, could be very interesting. If Coral submit that Rangers are a new club and therefore couldn't have been relegated and the judge goes on to find in their favour, we would appear to have some kind of resolution of the long-standing question of continuity. I'm not so sure that's the crux of the argument, I would have thought it was more to do with what both parties understood when the bet was place and accepted , hence introducing evidence from corals about advertisements saying "First old firm game since Rangers were relegated " and so on. Edited January 18, 2017 by LordHawHaw 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.