Jump to content

Follow Follow Rangers. Season 2024/25


Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Jinky67 said:

The right thing is to restore the original allocation. 

 

50,000 stadium capacity. 

45,000 season tickets.

7500 celtic fans.

 

Square peg, round hole scenario. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, bennett said:

 

50,000 stadium capacity. 

45,000 season tickets.

7500 celtic fans.

 

Square peg, round hole scenario. 

 

 

It’s a scenario your club created mate so you need to accept the consequences of that even if it means no fans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not this again. Can we not just accept that yes, Rangers instigated the reduction in the away fan allocation which led to Celtic refusing any tickets at all and be done with it?

Rangers appear willing to have some away fans in at the reduced numbers while Celtic do not. Case closed until something changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jinky67 said:

It’s a scenario your club created mate so you need to accept the consequences of that even if it means no fans. 

 

No fans is solely an entitled fc decision, Rangers are more than willing to be reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it’s perfectly acceptable for Celtic to refuse the paltry sum on the grounds of fan security and safety.

 

Rangers can’t even guarantee the security and safety of pundits.

 

Never mind the fact Rangers fans had tried to sneak a stash of weapons into Ibrox prior to us playing them…


Just suck it up and go back to the old allocation that you done away with because you got fed up watching Celtic fans celebrating in your stadium for all those years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The older I get the harder it is to get excited over players I know nothing about however its good to see we're strengthening in key areas. I don't think we had signed anybody this time last year...

We need another striker and at least 1 other winger, hopefully get the Ecuadorian we're linked with over the line but that seems to be taking a long time I wouldn't be surprised if it fizzles out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, AJF said:

A stand out star in Europe would likely cost about 5 or 6 times what we’ve paid for Dessers and you’re unlikely to find any plying their trade in Scotland. Even Celtic’s top performers last season were miles off it at CL level.

Dessers seemed to be a good player at Europa Conference League level a couple of years ago (top scorer in the competition with 10 goals), but finding a player that could do that at CL level or even in the Europa League is probably going to be out with our price range unless you get really lucky.

Was Fuffalo no top scorer in Europa  league a few years ago. So not sure what that really means. Have you got a like for like replacement for Morelos. (But hopefully without the baggage) then not a bad bit of business. I mean the morelos of a few years ago, not last season ob. A like for like replacement there would basically mean me getting me auld boots on again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bennett said:

 

No fans is solely an entitled fc decision, Rangers are more than willing to be reasonable.

You claim the history of a dead club and pretend you’re the most successful team in the world so let’s not get started on entitlement.

Secondly no fans is because your club cannot guarantee the safety of our fans, our staff and even our ex players now pundits. A situation your club created as you couldn’t take being repeatedly skelped at Ibrox and watching our fans celebrate so it has absolutely nothing to do with being entitled and everything to do with Rangers throwing their toys out of the pram and creating a situation that isn’t safe.

Edited by Jinky67
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

2 hours ago, kingjoey said:

"Sevco"  " reasonable" ?

I read that in a Neil Lennon voice. 

?type=og-image

 

 

1 hour ago, Jinky67 said:

You claim the history of a dead club and pretend you’re the most successful team in the world so let’s not get started on entitlement.

Secondly no fans is because your club cannot guarantee the safety of our fans, our staff and even our ex players now pundits. A situation your club created as you couldn’t take being repeatedly skelped at Ibrox and watching our fans celebrate so it has absolutely nothing to do with being entitled and everything to do with Rangers throwing their toys out of the pram and creating a situation that isn’t safe.

 

celtic get offered the same allocation as every team, no away fans is solely down to them. 

 

Anyway it'll be nice to see the Geordies filling the Broomloan for McGregors testimonial.

Edited by bennett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Insaintee said:

Was Fuffalo no top scorer in Europa  league a few years ago. So not sure what that really means. Have you got a like for like replacement for Morelos. (But hopefully without the baggage) then not a bad bit of business. I mean the morelos of a few years ago, not last season ob. A like for like replacement there would basically mean me getting me auld boots on again. 

Morelos probably falls under the category of us getting lucky in that we bought him for peanuts but he developed into a quality player. But I think it probably backs up my theory. At his peak (a few years ago as you mention), if we were to buy a player like Morelos it would've cost us a lot more than the fee we just paid for Dessers. We wouldn't have been able to afford Morelos if we were buying him then as opposed to when he was 20 years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bennett said:

 

 

I read that in a Neil Lennon voice. 

?type=og-image

 

 

 

celtic get offered the same allocation as every team, no away fans is solely down to them. 

 

Anyway it'll be nice to see the Geordies filling the Broomloan for McGregors testimonial.

No actually they don’t. Dortmund as an example had an allocation of around 2.7k for Ibrox in your Europa League match so don’t write anymore pish please.

Rangers fucked the fixture for fans then, now and for the future. Enjoy it as it’s what you wanted and no matter how often you say it was a Celtic decision doesn’t make that true, you reduced the allocations to a point it became unsafe for fans and devalued the full fixture as a fan experience. So look at the full story and not just the part that suits your narrative

Not that it should matter to you anyway, you watch from your armchair 

 

 

Edited by Jinky67
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jinky67 said:

No actually they don’t. Dortmund as an example had an allocation of around 2.7k for Ibrox in your Europa League match so don’t write anymore pish please.

Rangers fucked the fixture for fans then, now and for the future. Enjoy it as it’s what you wanted and no matter how often you say it was a Celtic decision doesn’t make that true, you reduced the allocations to a point it became unsafe for fans and devalued the full fixture as a fan experience. So look at the full story and not just the part that suits your narrative

Not that it should matter to you anyway, you watch from your armchair 

 

 

 

The simple fact is that celtic want zero away fans, while Rangers are willing to accommodate away fans.

 

Time to end this tedious chat, so we should both agree to agree with my view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jinky67 said:

No actually they don’t. Dortmund as an example had an allocation of around 2.7k for Ibrox in your Europa League match so don’t write anymore pish please.

Rangers fucked the fixture for fans then, now and for the future. Enjoy it as it’s what you wanted and no matter how often you say it was a Celtic decision doesn’t make that true, you reduced the allocations to a point it became unsafe for fans and devalued the full fixture as a fan experience. So look at the full story and not just the part that suits your narrative

Not that it should matter to you anyway, you watch from your armchair 

 

 

Is a minimum away allocation of 5% not a UEFA competition rule?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, bennett said:

 

The simple fact is that celtic want zero away fans, while Rangers are willing to accommodate away fans.

 

Time to end this tedious chat, so we should both agree to agree with my view.

It’s not simple as you refuse to acknowledge the reasons for the 700 fan allocation in the first place and the resulting decision taken by Celtic and Police Scotland were in the interest of fan safety, something you and Rangers clearly don’t care about which is your prerogative but don’t dress it up as something it’s not so I’ll maintain my position that you can f**k your allocation

11 minutes ago, DukDukGoose said:

Is a minimum away allocation of 5% not a UEFA competition rule?

It is but he said every team gets the same allocation, that’s not true as its competition dependant. If they can accommodate the 5% rule for UEFA then it’s possible for them to do it domestically, they choose not to and we all know the reasons why.

Edited by Jinky67
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jinky67 said:

It’s not simple as you refuse to acknowledge the reasons for the 700 fan allocation in the first place and the resulting decision taken by Celtic and Police Scotland were in the interest of fan safety, something you and Rangers clearly don’t care about which is your prerogative but don’t dress it up as something it’s not so I’ll maintain my position that you can f**k your allocation

It is but he said every team gets the same allocation, that’s not true as its competition dependant. If they can accommodate the 5% rule for UEFA then it’s possible for them to do it domestically, they choose not to and we all know the reasons why.

You're reaching. It's a straw man.

They'd give you the allocation for a Scottish cup game for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, DukDukGoose said:

You're reaching. It's a straw man.

They'd give you the allocation for a Scottish cup game for example.

Where is the reach? The only reason we would be given a higher allocation is because they have to as per the competition rules however how often do we play each other in quarter finals and earlier rounds? 

Their fans wanted the allocation cut, Rangers responded and cut the allocation to a level proven unsafe for fans so here we are in a position where we may only see Celtic and Rangers fans in the same stadium in cup semis and finals. 

Edited by Jinky67
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...