jagfox Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Wow, most of the net profits. Can't see much in the way of net profits if the old kit is getting sold off at around half price.Obviously the apparent chink of light is that the Gers get to negotiate a new deal from next season. If SD are still involved further questions would be raised [emoji56] [emoji48] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grass Is Greener. Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 4 minutes ago, BobWilliamson said: I was there when we stopped 10 in a row in 1975. Showing your age there I was only there for the most recent one and we celebrated that day as well. Weird game. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWilliamson Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 28 minutes ago, The Grass Is Greener. said: Showing your age there I was only there for the most recent one and we celebrated that day as well. Weird game. I should have added I was very VERY young and I was in the Hibs end . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1320Lichtie Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Laughed right out of there we lost a cup final mate . Ask the spoon burners how many title parties they have seen at Easter road . Bet they all involve Rangers Considering the old club died off the back of paying said players who won these titles I doubt they give a single f**k to be honest. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 52 minutes ago, jagfox99 said: Can't see much in the way of net profits if the old kit is getting sold off at around half price. Obviously the apparent chink of light is that the Gers get to negotiate a new deal from next season. If SD are still involved further questions would be raised New strips being discussed with puma, apparently 2nd and 3rd strips coming oot. Rumours of the general selling his shares too -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever_blueco Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 25 minutes ago, 1320Lichtie said: Considering the old club died off the back of paying said players who won these titles I doubt they give a single f**k to be honest. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Shirt sales are going well... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 23, 2017 Author Share Posted June 23, 2017 4 hours ago, RandomGuy. said: Has O'Halloran been playing in your pre-season games? We've got a winger on trial, but our manager hinted he might not sign him as he's more interested in a "more expensive" option. His history of signing players he trusts suggests it might be MOH. We've played 3 so far but there's not much been posted about them. Apparently MOH has played and trained as a right back. I can see him doing a job there. His delivery is too poor for him to play as a winger at any decent level. You'll know this yourself. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 10 hours ago, TheCelt67 said: How can a football forum make someone so angry? I think it's a combination of the forum and the drink tbh. Topped with a little bit of staunchness. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Oh, Hi Kinc... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Widge Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 We've played 3 so far but there's not much been posted about them. Apparently MOH has played and trained as a right back. I can see him doing a job there. His delivery is too poor for him to play as a winger at any decent level. You'll know this yourself. How much have you had to drink today if you think O'Halloran can play as a fullback. He's won one header in his life and shites it out of every tackle and header he's in for. Let's not even forget his positional sense is awful and he's thick as mince. If he plays fullback it'd be hilariously bad. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1320Lichtie Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 You can laugh all you want but it's true. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever_blueco Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 (edited) 8 minutes ago, 1320Lichtie said: You can laugh all you want but it's true. So I keep hearing . It's those pesky courts and governing body's who keep suggesting otherwise though he respondent asserts that the reference to “The Rangers Football Club” in clause 8.3 is not a reference to Newco but to “The Rangers Football Club, an association football club which is recognised to have a continuing existence regardless of the person which from time to time owns the Club”. It avers that at the time of the agreement the parties were aware of the importance of distinguishing between the Club and the limited companies which owned it from time to time. The criminal proceedings do not arise from the reclaimer having acted as chief executive of the respondent, The Rangers Football Club or The Rangers Football Club Limited. Rather, they arise as a result of the criminal conspiracies which he and his co‑accused agreed and executed. In these circumstances, to construe the agreement in favour of the reclaimer would be contrary to public policy. Edited June 23, 2017 by Forever_blueco 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 So I keep hearing . It's those pesky courts and governing body's who keep suggesting otherwise though he respondent asserts that the reference to “The Rangers Football Club” in clause 8.3 is not a reference to Newco but to “The Rangers Football Club, an association football club which is recognised to have a continuing existence regardless of the person which from time to time owns the Club”. It avers that at the time of the agreement the parties were aware of the importance of distinguishing between the Club and the limited companies which owned it from time to time. The criminal proceedings do not arise from the reclaimer having acted as chief executive of the respondent, The Rangers Football Club or The Rangers Football Club Limited. Rather, they arise as a result of the criminal conspiracies which he and his co‑accused agreed and executed. In these circumstances, to construe the agreement in favour of the reclaimer would be contrary to public policy. Aye but you let your club die [emoji6] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever_blueco Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, Dons_1988 said: Aye but you let your club die Suppose it is still better than letting Aberdeen live 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Suppose it is still better than letting Aberdeen live Come on now FB, you're better than that 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 40 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: We've played 3 so far but there's not much been posted about them. Apparently MOH has played and trained as a right back. I can see him doing a job there. His delivery is too poor for him to play as a winger at any decent level. You'll know this yourself. Be better off keeping Tavernier at right back. Neither can tackle or win a header but Tavernier is at least consistent with his delivery. In fact, rather than moving MOH back I'd have thought it worthwhile trying Tavernier further forward. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever_blueco Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Just now, Dons_1988 said: Come on now FB, you're better than that Has monkey tennis logged into your account ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever_blueco Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Just now, Ross. said: Be better off keeping Tavernier at right back. Neither can tackle or win a header but Tavernier is at least consistent with his delivery. In fact, rather than moving MOH back I'd have thought it worthwhile trying Tavernier further forward. Personally I would play Hodson behind tav unless we sign a better right back 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Has monkey tennis logged into your account ? Negative. I just think you're capable of funnier than that. Not that I'm claiming my original post was in anyway funny. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.