NotThePars Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Raphael Lataster is about as valid a source on this and worthy of consideration as Kasparov is on the existence of the Dark Ages in history. That is to say, not valid or remotely taken seriously. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 2 minutes ago, NotThePars said: Raphael Lataster is about as valid a source on this and worthy of consideration as Kasparov is on the existence of the Dark Ages in history. That is to say, not valid or remotely taken seriously. As are you on Raphael Lataster. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 2 hours ago, McQuade said: No Do you believe Jesus was the son of God, that his mother was a virgin and that he rose from the dead? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 https://apnews.com/5cbff69c85094bd583d763a09c794119/Hate-crimes-rose-for-2nd-year-in-a-row-in-2016,-FBI-reports?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP Hate crimes rose for 2nd year in a row in 2016, FBI reports WASHINGTON (AP) — Hate crimes rose for the second straight year in 2016, with increases in attacks motivated by bias against blacks, Jews, Muslims and LGBT people, according to FBI statistics released Monday. I call it "The Trump Effect". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob the tank Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 No Well tell us what you do believe then please, as what granny quoted seem to be what he is famous for. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Sessions' testimony really is something. https://www.c-span.org/video/?437024-1/attorney-general-sessions-pressed-justice-departments-independence&live 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 1 hour ago, Savage Henry said: Sessions' testimony really is something. https://www.c-span.org/video/?437024-1/attorney-general-sessions-pressed-justice-departments-independence&live There's something about Sessions that reminds me of throbber. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Session tells lies but can’t remember telling them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Angelo Barksdale Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 7 hours ago, TheProgressiveLiberal said: Being a progressive liberal .. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Most of the Representatives seem to be grandstanding with no attempt to find out anything, with some honourable exceptions. Both sides ask questions that they know he's not allowed to answer, either ongoing investigations or the Russia stuff that he recused himself from. Much as I despise Sessions on principle it must be hard to sit there getting shouted at for hours and supposed to be keeping detailed attention and ready with a strictly considered legal response to both sides of the House. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Just now, welshbairn said: Most of the Representatives seem to be grandstanding with no attempt to find out anything, with some honourable exceptions. Both sides ask questions that they know he's not allowed to answer, either ongoing investigations or the Russia stuff that he recused himself from. Much as I despise Sessions on principle it must be hard to sit there getting shouted at for hours and supposed to be keeping detailed attention and ready with a strictly considered legal response to both sides of the House. There are some odious careerists, and there are some decent folk on both sides. I have wikipedia open so I can quickly look up the names of the senators, but most of the time I can tell by the tone of the questions. I guess that means the Republicans aren't ready to dump Trump. Sessions says "I can't recall" on every other question. Compare this to Comey's testimony. A deceptive man and an honest man. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 1 minute ago, Savage Henry said: There are some odious careerists, and there are some decent folk on both sides. I have wikipedia open so I can quickly look up the names of the senators, but most of the time I can tell by the tone of the questions. I guess that means the Republicans aren't ready to dump Trump. Sessions says "I can't recall" on every other question. Compare this to Comey's testimony. A deceptive man and an honest man. The thing that gets me is the Republicans supposedly on his side who drag up unproven internet rumours about Clinton which he has to give a careful legal reply. No sympathy because the man is a c**t, but you'd expect his supporters to give him a wee rest from questioning from the Dems. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 I'm enjoying the off mic conversations. Somebody's talking about whether there's time to have lunch, -"I wanna go home and eat burritos" -and somebody else talking about most of his answers being "generic". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, welshbairn said: The thing that gets me is the Republicans supposedly on his side who drag up unproven internet rumours about Clinton which he has to give a careful legal reply. No sympathy because the man is a c**t, but you'd expect his supporters to give him a wee rest from questioning from the Dems. It's the Trump doctrine. Trump has never defended his own actions. Not once. He just turns around and yells "URANIUM". Attack the opposition. Whattaboutery personified. It's precisely what Trump does, and what they know Trump wants them to do. He doesn't give a shit if Sessions looks like a moron, or even if he goes to jail. It's the old All The President's Men quote... "these are not very bright guys." Edited November 14, 2017 by Savage Henry 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 I got annoyed with the Dems interrupting his answers until I noticed he was happy with quick answers to the Reps to let them fill out the 5 minute rule. Lazy c**t. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerberus Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 Hannity is now distancing himself from Roy Moore and says that Moore should provide evidence that he didn’t do touch weans or drop out the Senate race.Am I being too cynical by thinking Hannity’s about turn is far more to do with losing sponsorship money than anything to do with Moore being a beast? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 Roy Moore's lawyer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheProgressiveLiberal Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 Two strange things on the newest Roy Moore accuser. People are wondering why he signed "Merry Christmas" on her yearbook. Yearbooks come out at the end of the school year just before summer. Also, someone claiming to be her step son says he suspects she's lying. Here's the video. Who knows if it's real or what's going on in that family. Here's Roy Moore and his wife last night after the new allegation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheProgressiveLiberal Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 Rush Limbaugh had an interesting question. Mr. Moore's latest accuser says he locked her in the car. When did cars start to have the ability for the driver to lock every door? Wiki says the 80s. What type of care did Mr. Moore drive in the 1970s? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MEADOWXI Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 7 minutes ago, TheProgressiveLiberal said: Rush Limbaugh had an interesting question. Mr. Moore's latest accuser says he locked her in the car. When did cars start to have the ability for the driver to lock every door? Wiki says the 80s. What type of care did Mr. Moore drive in the 1970s? The 80s was keyless fobs for locking and unlocking doors, the ability to push a button in a car (Central Locking) and lock the doors is almost as old as cars, 1914 according to this WIKI bit, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_door_locks 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.