Jump to content

The Celtic All Seasons thread


Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Erih Shtrep said:

I base it on Gallagher being far more commanding than Davies - who's never impressed me at all.  Gallagher being taller, stronger, two footed, and  Gallagher playing at a higher level than Davies.   Gallagher also knows the league and would be an excellent fit at Celtic.   Gallagher is everything Shane Duffy isn't.  

Serious question, do you watch much of Preston? Cause earlier you referred to Davies as "this chap". But saying you have never been impressed suggests you watch him fairly regularly.

If Gallagher signs for Celtic, he'd be no more than 3rd or 4th choice centre back come next season if Celtic had any realistic ambition. He's a good player for a mid to lower table Premiership team, but so was/is Jack Hendry. Maybe even good for an Aberdeen or a Hibs. But he isnt good enough to start for either Celtic or Rangers IMO. Being better than Duffy isnt exactly high praise since Duffy might genuinely be the worst central defender in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, G51 said:

Caixinha was written off before he could even bring players in. The moment he lost 5-1 to Celtic with a team that wasn't even his, he was done.

If a new manager comes in and takes a bodying in one of the two Old Firm games left, he'll lose a lot of support. It's not fair, but it's how it is.

He certainly wasn’t written off by the board though, he was given a fair whack of financial backing. Its  pretty evident our board dont give a f**k who the manager should or shouldn’t be (in terms of fan input) anyway otherwise Lennon would have been binned months ago. Tbh I cant see a proper derby drubbing with the lack of fans driving for more. We were absolutely there for the taking in the first game this season and it just ended up being a 2-0 win as they decided to not really go up a gear when it was clearly there.

Edited by gannonball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Jacky1990 said:

Serious question, do you watch much of Preston? Cause earlier you referred to Davies as "this chap". But saying you have never been impressed suggests you watch him fairly regularly.

If Gallagher signs for Celtic, he'd be no more than 3rd or 4th choice centre back come next season if Celtic had any realistic ambition. He's a good player for a mid to lower table Premiership team, but so was/is Jack Hendry. Maybe even good for an Aberdeen or a Hibs. But he isnt good enough to start for either Celtic or Rangers IMO. Being better than Duffy isnt exactly high praise since Duffy might genuinely be the worst central defender in the league.

1) Jack Hendry has improved since         he left Celtic !!!!!

2)  Maybe your board will decide to            stick with Lenny.  Lenny decides            to try three at the back again ,          Dec in the middle of the three

Sorted !

Edited by ewan14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ewan14 said:

Jack Hendry has improved since he left Celtic !!!!!

Aye, seemingly doing well out there at the heart of a back 3. Hope he stays out there or comes back to a club where he will actually get game time.

If he does that, he wont be far away from the Scotland squad once the Euros are done I'd reckon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ewan14 said:

Jack Hendry has improved since he left Celtic !!!!!

Wouldn’t have been hard to be fair. When we signed him I said he was still way too raw and not good enough, he was a panic buy when he had 1 fit defender for a knock out European game. Despite all that we may actually make money off him as his loan buy out clause is more than what we paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Erih Shtrep said:

If Celtic are looking at signing this chap over Declan Gallagher that's absolute madness.  

Definitely not. Gallagher is nearly 30 and hasn't been especially impressive this season. Davies is much better on the ball as well as being left-sided which they don't currently have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jacky1990 said:

Serious question, do you watch much of Preston? Cause earlier you referred to Davies as "this chap". But saying you have never been impressed suggests you watch him fairly regularly.

If Gallagher signs for Celtic, he'd be no more than 3rd or 4th choice centre back come next season if Celtic had any realistic ambition. He's a good player for a mid to lower table Premiership team, but so was/is Jack Hendry. Maybe even good for an Aberdeen or a Hibs. But he isnt good enough to start for either Celtic or Rangers IMO. Being better than Duffy isnt exactly high praise since Duffy might genuinely be the worst central defender in the league.

You've never seen his play but you've concluded he's a better signing that Gallagher.   Having seen both play I would sign Gallagher on the basis he's far superior at playing the game of football.    Davies is actually quite decent with his right foot and of course Gallagher is completely two-footed so there's not a huge deal between them.   For me Celtic lack a commanding CB which - at nearly 1 ft taller - Gallagher.    Gallagher of course will be staring in the Euros playing against the likes of Harry Kane and has experience against Morelos, Edouward and in Europe.   Clearly a higher level.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Erih Shtrep said:

You've never seen his play but you've concluded he's a better signing that Gallagher.   Having seen both play I would sign Gallagher on the basis he's far superior at playing the game of football.    Davies is actually quite decent with his right foot and of course Gallagher is completely two-footed so there's not a huge deal between them.   For me Celtic lack a commanding CB which - at nearly 1 ft taller - Gallagher.    Gallagher of course will be staring in the Euros playing against the likes of Harry Kane and has experience against Morelos, Edouward and in Europe.   Clearly a higher level.  

 

Hiya Declan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Douglas Peel said:

On BBC Scotland news today ,E,mails gathered by BBC  under freedom of information,seem to say Celtic fc were given the ok for foreign travel on November 12th,by the Scottish goverment.That seems strange to be condemned later for the trip by the same  goverment?

Why? It's never been disputed that the Scottish Government gave permission. The criticism was for going ahead with the trip just as cases soared and as Scotland was going into a national lockdown, and for ignoring the very protocols required as part of that permission.

And of course criticism didn't just come from the government. Just about everyone thought it was a daft – and pointless – thing to do when the club's own fans couldn't leave their homes. And the way the club handled the criticism – sometimes acknowledging breaches, sometimes denying, apologising then not apologising – was shambolic.

Edited by Mr Heliums
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Douglas Peel said:

On BBC Scotland news today ,E,mails gathered by BBC  under freedom of information,seem to say Celtic fc were given the ok for foreign travel on November 12th,by the Scottish goverment.That seems strange to be condemned later for the trip by the same  goverment?

No idea why these emails are such a big story. Everyone knew that Celtic had been given permission by the Scottish Government in November to go abroad in January, that wasn’t the issue. The issue was that, given the deterioration in the Covid situation at the time of their trip, Celtic still chose to go on their jolly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Douglas Peel said:

On BBC Scotland news today ,E,mails gathered by BBC  under freedom of information,seem to say Celtic fc were given the ok for foreign travel on November 12th,by the Scottish goverment.That seems strange to be condemned later for the trip by the same  goverment?

If only they had followed the rules laid out by the JRG,  the trip itself was never the main issue. Though some people would say that the change in circumstances since the trip was approved was enough to cancel it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..unless the lockdown rules and restrictions changed after the 12th Nov but before the trip. or the approval was based on the existing rules...

politicians will say anything for self preservation, the condemnation from them only followed the condemnation of the bulk of the country

Just cos you are allowed doesnt mean you should...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kingjoey said:

No idea why these emails are such a big story. Everyone knew that Celtic had been given permission by the Scottish Government in November to go abroad in January, that wasn’t the issue. The issue was that, given the deterioration in the Covid situation at the time of their trip, Celtic still chose to go on their jolly.

I'm genuinely baffled as to why a high profile business can't just accept responsibility for its own decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...