NorthernLights Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 13 minutes ago, fatshaft said: Marie Boulton clearly against the bag She is against any new developments. She originally got voted in as a councillor on an anti-AWPR ticket. The stream which was working for the last 45 minutes or so has completely crashed now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 (edited) 15 minutes ago, fatshaft said: Marie Boulton clearly against the bag Probably due to her being on the SDP body that has been ignored by the planners based on financial forecasting that even Rangers probably wouldn't be brazen enough to use. Edited January 29, 2018 by strichener 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anotherchance Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Looks like it could be fucked Aberdeenshire Council can veto the bridge and therefore the project as a whole NIMBYs rejoice Training ground would still be ok in that event. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 1 minute ago, strichener said: Probably due to her being on the SDP body that has been ignored by the planners based on financial forecasting that even Rangers probably wouldn't be brazen enough to use. Maybe, but her final attack before feed crashed was on whether AFC were making a viable financial case, as Barney Rubble pointed out, that's not their remit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 1 minute ago, fatshaft said: Maybe, but her final attack before feed crashed was on whether AFC were making a viable financial case, as Barney Rubble pointed out, that's not their remit. No, she was stating that Aberdeen's economic case was based on additional revenue over and above match days. Barney stated that Aberdeen being a viable business was not the council's concern. They are both correct but only one of the points matters in the planning process and it ain't Barney's 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 5 minutes ago, anotherchance said: Training ground would still be ok in that event. It's all or nothing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 3 minutes ago, fatshaft said: It's all or nothing. AFC have stated they'd resubmit a training facilities only application. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 1 minute ago, williemillersmoustache said: AFC have stated they'd resubmit a training facilities only application. Aye, but it's approved or denied as a whole today. And there's no guarantee they'll go back for training ground only. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 1 minute ago, fatshaft said: Aye, but it's approved or denied as a whole today. And there's no guarantee they'll go back for training ground only. Just saying what was said at the AGM I think. But you're right, this proposal is not in bits, so in that sense, yes it is all or nothing as far as today is concerned. FFS some jobsworth asking what would happen if a cyclist went onto a dual carriageway. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 1 minute ago, williemillersmoustache said: FFS some jobsworth asking what would happen if a cyclist went onto a dual carriageway. Who's clearly never driven that road as many of the cyclists already ignore the cycle path. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 (edited) Listen to this boy - Aberdeen European Games in Glasgow!!! ETA: Equalities issues over travel. And they talk about the shite that NKS come out with. Edited January 29, 2018 by strichener 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 No more questions noted? So that's it, vote now after a pish/shit break? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Just now, fatshaft said: No more questions noted? So that's it, vote now after a pish/shit break? Three Councillors have requested to speak, including Boulton again. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Just now, strichener said: Three Councillors have requested to speak, including Boulton again. Ah missed that, i have to pop out and in of the feed. And aye she would. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Has any one fact checked this pish about playing games in Dundee/Edinburgh/Glasgow. Have UEFA provided a letter indicating this would be the case or not? I know the answer but just wondering why these arguments are being taken at face value. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 7 minutes ago, strichener said: Listen to this boy - Aberdeen European Games in Glasgow!!! ETA: Equalities issues over travel. And they talk about the shite that NKS come out with. Aye unbelievably contrived, straight from the NKS playbook of zoobry 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 (edited) Economic Argument ('000s): Current GVA: 9,279 Kingsford: 14,489 Kingsford with only Matches: 8,762 So if Kingsford is not allowed additional events then there is no economic benefit. Edited January 29, 2018 by strichener 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Material Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 These things strike me as being quite useless most of the time with such statements as "have you thought about congestion at a footbridge? I'm not saying there will be, but.....have you thought about it?" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shootingboots Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Why does the Peterhead fan care so much? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 1 minute ago, Captain Material said: These things strike me as being quite useless most of the time with such statements as "have you thought about congestion at a footbridge? I'm not saying there will be, but.....have you thought about it?" Yeah there really was no need to qualify it. Quite clearly there will be congestion at the footbridge. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.