Jump to content

Where’d the welfare thread go?


surely not!

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Surely once the licensing committee audit the facilities in late 2019 and find no floodlights are present, the club loses their licence at the next SFA board meeting after that? (and CSS/VoL in that case)

So would WW do a Threave and resign from the LL rather than trying to avoid finishing bottom again, if they have no plan on getting floodlights within the next year?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Whitburn Vale said:

Bit of a brass neck by the SFA not  to give Bonnyrigg a licence when the lights will be up before the season starts.

While WW have none and are in the LL ??

Neither do Vale or Strollers  , also at least WW use their own ground and not just share to avoid the rules

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Whitburn Vale said:

Was using WW as an example as they are the ones facing relegation.

This has to be a wake up call now for Civil's and VoL.

A wake up call,where do you expect clubs to pull say 20k from....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, magoo said:

A wake up call,where do you expect clubs to pull say 20k from....

The same place you found all the money during the glory days to pay for the best players while other clubs invested the money into the facilities. All teams with no floodlights should be automatically removed from the Lowland League, all clubs knew it was going to be a requirement since the inception of the Lowland League. So the teams with no floodlights have had 5 seasons to fundraise and install sufficient floodlighting. No sympathy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Whitburn Vale said:

My club and every other SHFL club has floodlights and are at Tier 5,so why is WW,VoL and Civil's getting away season after season without them??

Season after season it was only this season it became a ruling. Dry yer eyes man who's to say the 3 LL clubs without lights haven't made plans  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, newcastle broon said:

Season after season it was only this season it became a ruling. Dry yer eyes man who's to say the 3 LL clubs without lights haven't made plans  ?

It was in the original criteria, If you have knowledge of Whitehill or the other 2 clubs having floodlighting to be installed in the close season then please share!! I have my doubts!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lowland League Follower said:

The same place you found all the money during the glory days to pay for the best players while other clubs invested the money into the facilities. All teams with no floodlights should be automatically removed from the Lowland League, all clubs knew it was going to be a requirement since the inception of the Lowland League. So the teams with no floodlights have had 5 seasons to fundraise and install sufficient floodlighting. No sympathy

Ye raging mate :lol::lol::lol:

The ruling only came in a few months ago ffs :)

For what it's worth ww built changing rooms and a social club but that'll no count eh :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, newcastle broon said:

Ye raging mate :lol::lol::lol:

The ruling only came in a few months ago ffs :)

For what it's worth ww built changing rooms and a social club but that'll no count eh :lol:

I like the fact you have buried your head in the sand for the last 5 seasons cause it "only became a rule the last few months", The rules have been lightly adopted and now it is to be enforced, either apply for a grant to get floodlights installed or resign from the LL, (if you get a reprieve)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...