Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, The Moonster said:

When something I'm watching bombards me with something I don't like I always watch it every hour on the hour just so I can be annoyed about being bombarded with something I don't like.

It’s hard to get away from it. News, radio, internet, folk talking about it when out and about. I listen to the news once a day like Ive always done. I’m certainly not watching it every hour of every day. Thankfully I have other interests to pass my time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Todd_is_God said:

On the Louisa Jordan, the owners of the SECC weren't charging rent initially, but I doubt this will go on indefinitely. At some point (probably quite soon after hospitality and entertainment venues can re-open in some capacity) i'd imagine they'd either quite like their venue back, or start charging rent to help recover some of the income they will have lost this year.

All that sounds sensible. The owners of the Hydro/SEC have seemingly said it’s realistic to expect no gigs going ahead there until 2022! If that’s the case they’ll definitely need to start charging rent and rightly so IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Thereisalight.. said:

There’s a lot of if’s, but’s and maybe’s in their reporting. I think highlighting positive news regarding Covid isn’t too much to ask rather than just focusing on the negatives  

They are though. The BBC News website is currently prominently carrying the story about excess deaths being below the five year average for the first time since March on their front page.

I'm not sure what you want the media or bodies like the WHO to do to be honest. The pandemic isn't over, whilst we are hopefully on a positive trend now there will be bad news stories along the way and when those happen they can't just be swept under the carpet. They have to be reported on and responded to. It can't just be a constant stream of happy Covid news in order to lift the mood of the nation from now on, that's not what the function of the media is. The Leicester lockdown story that you are complaining about today, for example, isn't 'if, buts and maybes'. Its a real thing thats happening. It obviously has to be reported on and talked about given that a spike in infections severe enough to lock down a fairly sizeable city is a significant event in the UK's recovery. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, pandarilla said:

Just to clarify, they didn't leave the hospital, just left icu.

It's still brilliant news. Ninewells covers a fair size area and to have no icu patients continues the good news.

I'm guessing the non icu patients will be split into those who have been brought in with serious symptoms - who might need icu - and those who left icu and are now recuperating in a normal ward before going home.

I'm pretty confident that this sustained positive period is giving our hospitals the chance to really sort out the infrastructure to make best use of facilities. The initial scramble to reorganise probably wasn't the optimum situation for what we have now, or for preparation for any spikes or second waves.

I've got faith that our health service will be getting sorted, and hopefully we'll cope better when new cases do appear.


 

Well I've got a scan tomorrow which is the kind of thing that's been postponed, so hopefully that's a reflection of where the nhs as a whole is now. 

Apparently masks compulsory in hairmyres now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Paco said:

 

 


This is alarming. The UK Government aren’t releasing local data on the vast majority of new cases, so it’s impossible for MPs/local authorities/scientists to see localised spikes or trends, until the point where the government will presumably give them a call and a bit of a heads up.

Today alone we’ve had Matt Hancock saying that knowing how many people were tested in a day is ‘not meaningful’ when a child could tell you it’s a key metric, and the government also don’t know how many test results are being returned within 24 hours as was promised to be the case 100% of the time by today, by the actual Prime Minister. But the government (read: Serco) don’t have a clue.

The use of statistics by this government is beyond disgraceful, it’s dangerous. Double counting of tests, counting individual gloves as pieces of PPE, saving a batch of postal tests to ‘hit’ the 100k testing target, removing international comparisons when it started showing how badly we were doing. It’s alarming that anyone trusts a single word they say, at this point.

I certainly wouldn’t be sitting comfortably if I was a Mayor in England, trusting this government to give a nice timely heads up if things begin to look bad.

 

It seems absolutely bizarre at a time when local control more than ever is vital, the govt are consistently making moves to centralise power in WM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Paco said:

The use of statistics by this government is beyond disgraceful, it’s dangerous. Double counting of tests, counting individual gloves as pieces of PPE, saving a batch of postal tests to ‘hit’ the 100k testing target, removing international comparisons when it started showing how badly we were doing. It’s alarming that anyone trusts a single word they say, at this point.
 

 

The UK Statistics Authority (independent regulator for statistics) has twice had a go at the UK government over their use of statistics, but have previously commended the Scottish Gov for their clarity. Most recently they sent a letter to Hancock stating

"The way the data are analysed and presented currently gives them limited value for the first purpose (help understand the epidemic). The aim seems to be to show the largest possible number of tests, even at the expense of understanding. It is also hard to believe the statistics work to support the testing programme itself. The statistics and analysis serve neither purpose well."

"The testing statistics still fall well short of its expectations. It is not surprising that given their inadequacy data on testing are so widely criticised and often mistrusted."

Edited by s_dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are though. The BBC News website is currently prominently carrying the story about excess deaths being below the five year average for the first time since March on their front page.
I'm not sure what you want the media or bodies like the WHO to do to be honest. The pandemic isn't over, whilst we are hopefully on a positive trend now there will be bad news stories along the way and when those happen they can't just be swept under the carpet. They have to be reported on and responded to. It can't just be a constant stream of happy Covid news in order to lift the mood of the nation from now on, that's not what the function of the media is. The Leicester lockdown story that you are complaining about today, for example, isn't 'if, buts and maybes'. Its a real thing thats happening. It obviously has to be reported on and talked about given that a spike in infections severe enough to lock down a fairly sizeable city is a significant event in the UK's recovery. 
Aye, imagine the World Health Organisation looking at the big picture worldwide, where cases are still going up at a terrifying rate in some places, rather than thinking it's almost over because Scotland are down to just about single figure deaths per week.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said:

What's the thoughts on the 2m SD review ? Sounds to me that NS is preparing us for no reduction at this review.

Dunno, apparently sage were pretty raging at it being reduced in England, but I've not read any data recently either backing it or saying its a bad idea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, madwullie said:

Dunno, apparently sage were pretty raging at it being reduced in England, but I've not read any data recently either backing it or saying its a bad idea. 

Also just read on twitter that MPs have voted to keep 2m in the HoC. Make of that what you will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Paco said:

 

 


This is alarming. The UK Government aren’t releasing local data on the vast majority of new cases, so it’s impossible for MPs/local authorities/scientists to see localised spikes or trends, until the point where the government will presumably give them a call and a bit of a heads up.

Today alone we’ve had Matt Hancock saying that knowing how many people were tested in a day is ‘not meaningful’ when a child could tell you it’s a key metric, and the government also don’t know how many test results are being returned within 24 hours as was promised to be the case 100% of the time by today, by the actual Prime Minister. But the government (read: Serco) don’t have a clue.

The use of statistics by this government is beyond disgraceful, it’s dangerous. Double counting of tests, counting individual gloves as pieces of PPE, saving a batch of postal tests to ‘hit’ the 100k testing target, removing international comparisons when it started showing how badly we were doing. It’s alarming that anyone trusts a single word they say, at this point.

I certainly wouldn’t be sitting comfortably if I was a Mayor in England, trusting this government to give a nice timely heads up if things begin to look bad.

 

 

In the midst of the pandemic when people were constantly pulling up the Scottish government for their performance on testing, PPE being worse than England I often wondered if this would prove to be the case. They've probably suspected all along that the English figures are bogus, but without any proof they've probably just had to suck it up and wait for the story to inevitably come out several weeks or months down the line.

I've no doubt the Scottish government have occasionally been slightly economical with the truth too, but nowhere near to the same extent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said:

What's the thoughts on the 2m SD review ? Sounds to me that NS is preparing us for no reduction at this review.

I imagine the "why?" question will be asked either way. Would be interesting to see the reasons both for and against following the English approach of "1m+"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hearing of an outbreak in Lossiemouth, at the RAF base (two contractors have tested positive). The runway is getting repaired just now, and contractors have been coming up to do the work from England on a weekly basis. The locals have been complaining for months now, and this was why.

The contractors use the shops in the town and live in hotels there mon-thu, so worrying for Lossie and it's residents.

Lossie could be become Scotland's Leicester

Edited by Steven W
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Steven W said:

Hearing of an outbreak in Lossiemouth, at the RAF base (two contractors have tested positive). The runway is getting repaired just now, and contractors have been coming up to do the work from England on a weekly basis. The locals have been complaining for months now, and this was why.

The contractors use the shops in the town and live in hotels there mon-thu, so worrying for Lossie and it's residents.

Lossie could be become Scotland's Leicester

Not enough to stop them taking the booking I bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Steven W said:

Hearing of an outbreak in Lossiemouth, at the RAF base (two contractors have tested positive). The runway is getting repaired just now, and contractors have been coming up to do the work from England on a weekly basis. The locals have been complaining for months now, and this was why.

The contractors use the shops in the town and live in hotels there mon-thu, so worrying for Lossie and it's residents.

Lossie could be become Scotland's Leicester

https://www.grampianonline.co.uk/news/two-covid-cases-confirmed-among-raf-lossiemouth-runway-workers-204487/

Potentially a big story. But hopefully not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...