Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ICTChris said:

Read something interesting this morning, pertinent to the chat about herd immunity. The ‘Herd immunity Policy’ has taken this mythic status, the idea that evil Tories sat down and planned to kill thousands of people with Dominic Cummings somehow in charge. However, at the time a lot of more acceptable people (including the cuddly Scottish Government, who love all its citizens and don’t want any of us to die of anything, ever) promoted the term Flatten the curve. Flattening the curve is a herd immunity strategy with mitigation to prevent health services becoming overrun. The curve is flattened on the way to herd immunity. That is what this graph, seen very frequently last year, shows

IMG_1239.jpg

I recall the main clinical advisor to the Scottish Government drawing this graph on a flip chart on the news discussing why the SG were taking the approach they were - allowing concerts, football matches, keeping schools open etc.
 

Flattening the curve in the fight against C-19 is associated with a number of measures that are taken to ensure, as you say, the healthcare system does not become over-run. Ensuring the number of people infected on a daily basis that required hospital care and use of ICU was the goal - how that was achieved varied from country to country and Government to Government. Herd immunity was one such measures that was discussed early on by a number of experts and Governments including Westminster but few (if any - Sweden?) went ahead with it. However the term flattening the curve continued to be used at briefings and as a narrative but had no connection to the action of herd immunity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bairnardo said:


 

 


Scotland has half the number of deaths as England.


From the guy who lectured Craigkillie on his grasp of statistics

emoji23.pngemoji23.pngemoji23.png

 

Per capita you fucking moron.

I didn't think anybody would be stupid enough to require that explained to them, but you have taken stupidity to new levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, KingRocketman II said:

Flattening the curve in the fight against C-19 is associated with a number of measures that are taken to ensure, as you say, the healthcare system does not become over-run. Ensuring the number of people infected on a daily basis that required hospital care and use of ICU was the goal - how that was achieved varied from country to country and Government to Government. Herd immunity was one such measures that was discussed early on by a number of experts and Governments including Westminster but few (if any - Sweden?) went ahead with it. However the term flattening the curve continued to be used at briefings and as a narrative but had no connection to the action of herd immunity. 

No it did, that's a mistake and they will try to perpetuate it. Flattening the curve was a technique to try to achieve herd immunity but in a managed way. Realistically nobody would just let it go and do nothing as it would cause the health service to be overwhlemed, the economy collapse and societal breakdown. Flattening the curve is a choice to allow it to pass through your population but in a managed way.

The other approach, taken by countries like NZ, is suppression. To suppress the virus and eventually eliminate it from society then gain immunity through vaccination. That's why the disparity in deaths is so big. I think people here, because our media won't tell them, don't realise how bad a job our government have done. If we have the same rate of deaths as NZ we'd have about 350. Instead we have over a hundred thousand and are tripling NZ's per capita figure almost every day.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Carnoustie Young Guvnor said:

No it did, that's a mistake and they will try to perpetuate it. Flattening the curve was a technique to try to achieve herd immunity but in a managed way. Realistically nobody would just let it go and do nothing as it would cause the health service to be overwhlemed, the economy collapse and societal breakdown. Flattening the curve is a choice to allow it to pass through your population but in a managed way.

The other approach, taken by countries like NZ, is suppression. To suppress the virus and eventually eliminate it from society then gain immunity through vaccination. That's why the disparity in deaths is so big. I think people here, because our media won't tell them, don't realise how bad a job our government have done. If we have the same rate of deaths as NZ we'd have about 350. Instead we have over a hundred thousand and are tripling NZ's per capita figure almost every day.

 

yes but what I said (probably not very well) is that the term came to be used to cover a number of measures that were being deployed rather than the true meaning. "flattening the curve" was still being used in Westminster press briefings in May when herd immunity was not the measure that was being employed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KingRocketman II said:

yes but what I said (probably not very well) is that the term came to be used to cover a number of measures that were being deployed rather than the true meaning. "flattening the curve" was still being used in Westminster press briefings in May when herd immunity was not the measure that was being employed. 

I don't think you're understanding, flattening the curve and herd immunity are the same thing.  Flattening the curve is a technique to achieve herd immunity in a managed way.  What you want to do is eliminate altogether so there is no curve to flatten, but we didn't take the route of suppression.

Its worth repeating again for posterity, everybody should be aware of this.

If you extrapolate NZ's death figure to a population the size of the UK we would have about 350 deaths, total, throughout the entire pandemic,  If our govt had done as good a job as NZ's. We are more than tripling that figure every single day.  Its breathtaking.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I joined P&B in August 2003. In that time there have been plenty of folk I've utterly disagreed with, especially on this thread when tensions can run high, but I've never had the need to mute or block anyone. 

Until this morning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PWL said:

I joined P&B in August 2003. In that time there have been plenty of folk I've utterly disagreed with, especially on this thread when tensions can run high, but I've never had the need to mute or block anyone. 

Until this morning. 

You can’t leave it there....

ETA wondering if he can see this!

Edited by Granny Danger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, PWL said:

I joined P&B in August 2003. In that time there have been plenty of folk I've utterly disagreed with, especially on this thread when tensions can run high, but I've never had the need to mute or block anyone. 

Until this morning. 

Who?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per capita you fucking moron.
I didn't think anybody would be stupid enough to require that explained to them, but you have taken stupidity to new levels.
Well we have significantly more than half of Englands death per million people, so perhaps you are unqualified to speak on this?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TheJTS98 said:

Malaysian equivalent of this is the private hospitals' obsession with MRI scans. Obviously, the most expensive thing they can offer on a daily basis.

Go in with a sore head. They'll try to bully you into an immediate MRI. Sore Knee? MRI. A cough? MRI. Obviously broken toe (as I had last year)? MRI.

I actually couldn't avoid a laugh last time I was in (for the broken toe). I'd shown him my foot, he'd done the x-ray, he'd shown me the break, and he'd told me basically just to rest as there's nothing to be done. Then, just as I'm standing up to leave, "If you'd like more peace of mind, we can offer you an MRI...". I told him I wondered what had taken so long. The joys of private health.

I dread to think what it would have cost me these last few years since I was diagnosed with COPD (never mind the prostate cancer).

Umpteen chest x-rays. A couple/three consultations with a chest specialist.

A consultation with a prostate specialist. Prostate biopsy. MRI scan. Bowel scan. (Another scan which I can't remember what it was for - bone scan perhaps.) Consultation with an oncologist. 4 implants to date.*

Plus umpteen courses of antibiotics for my chest and repeat inhalers every month.

Thank God for the Beveridge report and those who implemented it.

*ETA: These are £400.00 a pop. apparently.

 

Edited by Jacksgranda
Update and Sllepnig
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Steven W said:

Saw this last night and meant to post, but was busy with other stuff (Morton v Dunfermline!).

Virologist says it's a one-off, but find myself thinking "Really?"

Would answer a lot of it's being harboured on foodstuff

Millions more would have caught it if that were the case, surely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...