Rugster Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 4 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said: I thought it was pretty clear that £20 was the premium, and that £200 was the ticket price. i.e. 50,000 insurance premiums at £20 vs 500 claims of £200 I missed that bit, apologies! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
die hard doonhamer Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 Just now, Todd_is_God said: 500 is 1% of 50,000 btw £100k is 10% of £1m. Claims ratio is calculated on value, not volume. 1% would be your claims frequency. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 4 minutes ago, Les Cabbage said: Last few pages are absolutely grim reading. The prospect of no loud, packed football crowds, no packed music venues, no packed bars with singing, seeing loads of folk youve no seen in ages and getting a blether is just total shite, all that’ll happen is everyone’s social lives will move to house parties whether illegal or not and it’s a grim reality that it would appear that some people advising the government actually want and the government don’t seem to be resisting. Absolutely correct and the mere act of vaccine passporting will only encourage this trend. We are not at Israel levels of vaccination, nor Israel levels of creepy state compliance either (yet). If the government tries to create a two-tier system then its remaining restrictions will - rightly or wrongly - be flouted and ignored wherever possible. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 Just now, die hard doonhamer said: £100k is 10% of £1m. Claims ratio is calculated on value, not volume. 1% would be your claims frequency. Got you now, cheers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 3 minutes ago, virginton said: That'll be a 'No you actually didn't say this; deepest apologies for being wrong.' It only very clearly implies this if you are foolish enough to consider peer distraction the main cause of a student's inability to complete tasks. Are you that foolish? I don't believe I'm the one who's emerging from this exchange looking foolish. You're as strident as you are ignorant. It's a lousy combination. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aufc Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 If wee nic announces nurseries back next week then i may cream my wee panties -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 If wee nic announces nurseries back next week then i may cream my wee pantiesIts nurseries and P1 to 3 that was the plan so you are surely expecting that already?Or are you just menaing confirmation? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 2 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: I don't believe I'm the one who's emerging from this exchange looking foolish. You're as strident as you are ignorant. It's a lousy combination. Your blubbering didn't answer my question: It only very clearly implies this if you are foolish enough to consider peer distraction the main cause of a student's inability to complete tasks. Are you that foolish? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charger29 Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 58 minutes ago, 101 said: I can picture the Euro's already. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 3 minutes ago, Bairnardo said: Its nurseries and P1 to 3 that was the plan so you are surely expecting that already? Or are you just menaing confirmation? Leitch was tempering it down a bit last week, saying numbers may not have come down enough to allow it to happen. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madwullie Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 27 minutes ago, Left Back said: that is the point but is it legal? It was discussed at length the other day so I'm not going to re-hash it. I think I missed that but fair fucks 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 2 minutes ago, charger29 said: I can picture the Euro's already. You're not spreading any more! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Left Back Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 6 minutes ago, die hard doonhamer said: £100k is 10% of £1m. Claims ratio is calculated on value, not volume. 1% would be your claims frequency. I would assume from your earlier comment that the insurer trousering 90% of the premiums would be frowned upon as it would be viewed as profiteering? I could understand this for products you have to have (like car insurance) but less so when it's entirely optional insurance. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 (edited) I think if there are restrictions going forward we'll accept them with little more than a whimper, even if some would be unthinkable 6 months ago. Edited February 16, 2021 by ayrmad 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
renton Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 5 minutes ago, Bairnardo said: Its nurseries and P1 to 3 that was the plan so you are surely expecting that already? Or are you just menaing confirmation? Suspect if it wasn't going ahead we'd have seen some government approved leaking to the press by now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 3 minutes ago, Rugster said: Leitch was tempering it down a bit last week, saying numbers may not have come down enough to allow it to happen. Iv killed for less 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 Foundy Boy definitely has pictures of Jason and Devi on his bedroom walls 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 7 minutes ago, virginton said: Your blubbering didn't answer my question: It only very clearly implies this if you are foolish enough to consider peer distraction the main cause of a student's inability to complete tasks. Are you that foolish? Stamping your foot while repeatedly mouthing the same irrelevance will not win the day I'm afraid. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 5 minutes ago, Bairnardo said: Iv killed for less Tell me about it. Sturgeon was a bit more positive yesterday, I think it will happen. As said by @renton I think there would have been stronger leaks that it wasn't going to happen by now if so. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
die hard doonhamer Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 6 minutes ago, Left Back said: I would assume from your earlier comment that the insurer trousering 90% of the premiums would be frowned upon as it would be viewed as profiteering? I could understand this for products you have to have (like car insurance) but less so when it's entirely optional insurance. Yes, products have to be designed to meet a customer need, and value is a consideration within that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.