Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Tony Savage said:

Omerta

Whoever appeals to the law against his fellow man is either a fool or a coward. Whoever cannot take care of himself without that law is both. For a wounded man shall say to his assailant "if I live, I will kill you. If I die, you are forgiven." Such is the rule of honour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, williemillersmoustache said:

Just so long as you now know the difference between one of the four pillars of an economic and political union and measures designed to stop folk from catching the plague. 

'The plague.' warnock.png

The Scottish Government could have aligned itself with the EU's travel and border policies throughout, but has ended up going along with Brexit Britain instead - which is even less 'close the borders' gutter rhetoric than the Scottish Government.

I hope that sinks in eventually, because it won't ever be forgotten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Melanius Mullarkey said:

Attach UV disinfectant to your head 🧐

Some people need to be shown pictures of themselves trying to eat mud and that as toddlers to show them the air isn't going to murder them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I try not to let individual politicians and their words/actions annoy me too much, so fair play to John Swinney for working me, a grown adult who should know better, into the biggest fucking seethe fest of all time with that "vertical drinking" patter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been reading Deepti's take-down of a paper on long Covid published in the Lancet. It's funny - she is slagging off every shortcoming in the paper. Where did she read about these shortcomings? In the paper, where the authors (like every other scientific author) stated what the limitations in their study were.

The study is "heavily flawed" because parents of ill children are filling in the data rather than the sick kids themselves. Honestly, she is losing the plot. An editor of a journal would take these criticisms and bin them (you often get reviewers who don't understand what they are reviewing). Every study has limitations!

Then we get this:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Michael W said:

 

Remember 10 years in jail for a false declaration of you travelled from a red list country and £10k fines for unlawful gatherings? 

There was also the police helicopter following a couple walking their dog in the Yorkshire Dales, and also a righteous 'did ye aye?' story from Eamonn Holmes' wife on some stupid morning show about jumping out the way of a man who brushed past her in the shop and asking that he respect her space. Lapped up by hordes of Lovejoys who aren't prepared to move on from March 2020.

If I had complete power over this silly little island for a day I would make up some nonsense about an imminent and unpreventable nuclear threat and image.png.04f43cf241b81dd91f5ec5baaaa61d5f.pngwhile everyone clawed each other's faces off.

Edited by AMMjag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, scottsdad said:

Been reading Deepti's take-down of a paper on long Covid published in the Lancet. It's funny - she is slagging off every shortcoming in the paper. Where did she read about these shortcomings? In the paper, where the authors (like every other scientific author) stated what the limitations in their study were.

The study is "heavily flawed" because parents of ill children are filling in the data rather than the sick kids themselves. Honestly, she is losing the plot. An editor of a journal would take these criticisms and bin them (you often get reviewers who don't understand what they are reviewing). Every study has limitations!

Then we get this:

 

Isn't her much vaunted ONS study basically doing the same thing, essentially self reporting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, scottsdad said:

Been reading Deepti's take-down of a paper on long Covid published in the Lancet. It's funny - she is slagging off every shortcoming in the paper. Where did she read about these shortcomings? In the paper, where the authors (like every other scientific author) stated what the limitations in their study were.

The study is "heavily flawed" because parents of ill children are filling in the data rather than the sick kids themselves. Honestly, she is losing the plot. An editor of a journal would take these criticisms and bin them (you often get reviewers who don't understand what they are reviewing). Every study has limitations!

Then we get this:

 

Perhaps Deepti can run her own study on this since it's an area she seems to have an especially keen interest. I am particularly interested to see her back up her "7-8% of Children get long covid" assertions. Of course, she won't do this and will just continue her screeching from the sidelines. 

And yes the study is flawed - it's relying on self-reports! I've been tired for about the past three years. Maybe I can self-diagnosis long covid. 

I read through some of the comments as well. Most are the standard blue heart and EU flag in the bio fanclub, and there's the odd person calling her a fraud in there as well. But one comment struck me and it's something that I think is true. The comment was that she utterly refuses to listen to paediatric doctors and their experience, and is instead essentially concocting some sort of conspiracy that they are involved in concealing. In other words, loads of kids have long covid and paediatricians are lying about it. 

She is impervious to any dissenting opinion and seems unwilling, for whatever reason, to take a look at what is actually happening on the ground whilst she peddles her agenda. I am not a scientist or a researcher, but I have a comprehension of professional ethics and understand the principles around objectivity, which Gurdasani is failing to demonstrate. 

I think she needs to take some time off. She's said before that she is clinically vulnerable and it is throttling her objectivity. 

 

Edited by Michael W
Typos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...