Paxo Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 32 minutes ago, Left Back said: Going to a gig in England at the weekend. Just received an email saying we need to either prove vaccination status, provide evidence of a negative LFT from that day or natural immunity by providing evidence of a positive PCR within the last 180 days. Welcome to the new normal. Didn't think these rules were kicking in until the end of the month in England. I went to a gig down South last Friday. Just reported a negative LFT online and received a confirmation email from them to show at the gig. I didn't actually take the test and the boy checking these 'Covid passes' clearly couldn't give a shit anyway. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PWL Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 1 hour ago, Todd_is_God said: Seriously, though, what is the point in testing 1% of the population each day when there are no restrictions on daily life? I can't get my head around that thought process. Mass testing is just the latest in a long line of measures introduced in the early days, which are stubbornly retained no matter what. Can only use my own example. On Thursday my daughter (aged14) tested positive on an LFT. Her netball club ask that all players take one before training. The four of in household all got PCRs the next day. Cos the rest of us all tested negative and are jagged we could go back to work/school - though wee one is confined to barracks having had covid confirmed. So if we are averaging 6k positives a day and same situation as ourselves in household of three or four. Then add in those who get PCRs as standard through work (NHS/care etc). It's easy to see where the 1% a day is coming from. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 (edited) 13 minutes ago, PWL said: Can only use my own example. On Thursday my daughter (aged14) tested positive on an LFT. Her netball club ask that all players take one before training. The four of in household all got PCRs the next day. Cos the rest of us all tested negative and are jagged we could go back to work/school - though wee one is confined to barracks having had covid confirmed. So if we are averaging 6k positives a day and same situation as ourselves in household of three or four. Then add in those who get PCRs as standard through work (NHS/care etc). It's easy to see where the 1% a day is coming from. I understand where they are coming from, but what I don't understand is why we are doing it. What is the ultimate goal of testing 1 in every 100 people each day, alongside the complete absence of any other measures? It doesn't make sense. I think it's quite clear now that the vaccines aren't tremendous at preventing transmission, but they are very good at preventing serious disease. So if we are happy to bin distancing and capacity limits (which I feel is right given the vaccine coverage), then continuing to contact trace and mass test asymptomatic people seems like a complete waste of time, which achieves absolutely nothing other than being disruptive to business and people's lives. Swinney said the SG have abandoned their zero covid stance. Accept then it is here to stay and get on with life. Edited September 6, 2021 by Todd_is_God 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betting competition Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 54 minutes ago, Left Back said: Going to a gig in England at the weekend. Just received an email saying we need to either prove vaccination status, provide evidence of a negative LFT from that day or natural immunity by providing evidence of a positive PCR within the last 180 days. Welcome to the new normal. Didn't think these rules were kicking in until the end of the month in England. There was a gig at Mono last week where you had to take LFT before the gig. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 1 hour ago, Michael W said: Tell her to buy a FFP3 mask and shut up. Don't forget safety goggles, which the we care more brigade have conveniently ditched from their hazmat uniform. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladdin Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 1 hour ago, Left Back said: Going to a gig in England at the weekend. Just received an email saying we need to either prove vaccination status, provide evidence of a negative LFT from that day or natural immunity by providing evidence of a positive PCR within the last 180 days. Welcome to the new normal. Didn't think these rules were kicking in until the end of the month in England. That will just be the venue's own policy. Quite a few places up here are doing similar. With the option to demonstrate a negative test, there isn't really too much that can be done about it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 To be fair, I see the Scottish Govt have now started a tv campaign encouraging folk not to get tested. Spoiler 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottsdad Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Melanius Mullarkey said: To be fair, I see the Scottish Govt have now started a tv campaign encouraging folk not to get tested. Hide contents Why is she holding a sounding rod? If that's the test that will stop the spike, no thanks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Bully Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 33 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said: I understand where they are coming from, but what I don't understand is why we are doing it. What is the ultimate goal of testing 1 in every 100 people each day, alongside the complete absence of any other measures? It doesn't make sense. I think it's quite clear now that the vaccines aren't tremendous at preventing transmission, but they are very good at preventing serious disease. So if we are happy to bin distancing and capacity limits (which I feel is right given the vaccine coverage), then continuing to contact trace and mass test asymptomatic people seems like a complete waste of time, which achieves absolutely nothing other than being disruptive to business and people's lives. Swinney said the SG have abandoned their zero covid stance. Accept then it is here to stay and get on with life. Because it allows us, in real time, to see the impact of the vaccines, and whether the introduction of any variants changes this. There is a fabulous chart on Travelling Tabby showing the difference this time to previous waves. If we only carried out 10% (say) of the amount of tests we are currently carrying out, the data would have a case rate of 600 rather than 6000, and it wouldn’t be clear at all that the vaccines are having any effect. It is providing data proving what you want it to - that the vaccines are the difference. I’m also glad that there is apparently a “complete absence of any other measures”. I was sure from reading the last 100 pages or so that the SG had kept some highly unpopular measures, but obviously not. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superbigal Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 Home Nations Daily update : UK Average 356.1 to 362.9 up 1.91%, England 303.2 to 309.4 up 2.04%, Wales 445.5 to 465.2 up 4.42%, Northern Ireland 560.8 to 545.9 down 2.66% UK, England & Wales back on the rise as the schools return. Scotland has the top 9 infected council areas in UK and 17 of the top 20. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 54 minutes ago, Wee Bully said: Because it allows us, in real time, to see the impact of the vaccines, and whether the introduction of any variants changes this. There is a fabulous chart on Travelling Tabby showing the difference this time to previous waves. If we only carried out 10% (say) of the amount of tests we are currently carrying out, the data would have a case rate of 600 rather than 6000, and it wouldn’t be clear at all that the vaccines are having any effect. It is providing data proving what you want it to - that the vaccines are the difference. I’m also glad that there is apparently a “complete absence of any other measures”. I was sure from reading the last 100 pages or so that the SG had kept some highly unpopular measures, but obviously not. Maybe so, but mass testing (and contact tracing) comes with significant downsides. Your point about trends is flawed as well, as when you change multiple variables, comparisons are less robust. If we tested only people severely ill with covid, the number of covid deaths and patients in hospital would fall overnight. Similarly, testing shit loads of young adults and school kids and pointing at the difference in hospitalisation rates is also flawed. If you want to demonstrated the impact of vaccines, then you need to keep everything else constant. The SG appear to be over-compensating for their complete failure to implement a robust testing regime when it really mattered. What is the end game? Where does the nonsense end? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 I've got a feeling that a lot of the viral stories we hear from hospitals are like this one. Fit and healthy people in their 30s dropping dead etc 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Bully Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 36 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said: Your point about trends is flawed as well, as when you change multiple variables, comparisons are less robust. If we tested only people severely ill with covid, the number of covid deaths and patients in hospital would fall overnight. Similarly, testing shit loads of young adults and school kids and pointing at the difference in hospitalisation rates is also flawed. If you want to demonstrated the impact of vaccines, then you need to keep everything else constant. The more data sets, the better. The more people we test, the more we can accurately judge things like positivity rates, which can equally be measured against hospitalisations and deaths. The key to making good decisions is not to remove useful data from the equation. I want the decision makers to have as much information in front of them as possible, so that they make informed decisions. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 Alberta regrets following the UK model and are now mandating masks for all public indoor spaces and offering $100 a jag. Shows how following other countries models can trip you up. Hospitalisations doubled in a fortnight after opening up. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/alberta/article-albertas-use-of-british-covid-19-data-was-a-miscalculation/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Wee Bully said: The more data sets, the better. The more people we test, the more we can accurately judge things like positivity rates, which can equally be measured against hospitalisations and deaths. The key to making good decisions is not to remove useful data from the equation. I want the decision makers to have as much information in front of them as possible, so that they make informed decisions. I don't disagree with your underlying sentiment here. But, given it is not impact free, where does it end? What are we trying to achieve? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob1885 Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 https://inews.co.uk/news/covid-lockdown-government-plans-october-firebreak-restrictions-hospital-admissions-1185533 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 2 minutes ago, Rob1885 said: https://inews.co.uk/news/covid-lockdown-government-plans-october-firebreak-restrictions-hospital-admissions-1185533 Simply not going to happen. There is no noise at all about a furlough extension, which would be required for this. Next the media will be telling us BJ is drawing up plans to deploy the Army should someone invade us. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thereisalight.. Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 Not 100% sure on this but I'm sure I heard on the radio earlier than Denmark and Ireland were ditching vaccine passports. Yet us and England are storming on with them. BJ and NS, two dangerous clowns 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 24 minutes ago, Thereisalight.. said: Not 100% sure on this but I'm sure I heard on the radio earlier than Denmark and Ireland were ditching vaccine passports. Yet us and England are storming on with them. BJ and NS, two dangerous clowns The same way Israel ditched them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Posted September 6, 2021 Share Posted September 6, 2021 2 hours ago, Melanius Mullarkey said: To be fair, I see the Scottish Govt have now started a tv campaign encouraging folk not to get tested. Hide contents Surely she's not been recruited for an ad campaign? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.