Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Left Back said:

From here.  Sturgeons own words yesterday.

https://www.gov.scot/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-update-first-ministers-statement-11-january-2022/

"For instance, our central projection last month was that new infections could reach 50,000 a day by early January."

I think you will find the words "likely" and "could" have very different meanings.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Caledonian1 said:

I think you will find the words "likely" and "could" have very different meanings.  

So why are the government acting as if it's likely?  You can't have it both ways.

It's again carefully phrased to both scare people and to attempt to justify their actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Left Back said:

So why are the government acting as if it's likely?  You can't have it both ways.

It's again carefully phrased to both scare people and to attempt to justify their actions.

the government acted as if it could have happened

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Caledonian1 said:

the government acted as if it could have happened

Really?  the government take actions based on things that could happen?  The Russians could invade Ukraine tomorrow.  We could get dragged into a European war.  Are we gearing up our armed forces and getting into a state of readiness for it?  I think not.  Why is that?  Because it's not likely to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dons_1988 said:

And that is the fundamental question here isn’t it?

Should the government have the ability to turn “protections” on and off at the drop of a hat ad infinitum based on things that ‘could happen’? 

That’s not what I think their job is, tbh. 

the core problem is a society that even pre-covid hysteria expects the state to wipe our arses from cradle to grave

and the state employs the kind of people who oblige - maniacs who get a kick out of fixing everyone with top-down 'solutions'

self fulfilling spiraling nanny stateism.

Edited by Glennie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Glennie said:

the core problem is a society that even pre-covid hysteria expects the state to wipe our arses from cradle to birth

and the state employs the kind of people who oblige - maniacs who get a kick out of fixing everyone with top-down 'solutions'

self fulfilling spiraling mammy stateism.

FTFY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Glennie said:

the core problem is a society that even pre-covid hysteria expects the state to wipe our arses from cradle to birth

and the state employs the kind of people who oblige - maniacs who get a kick out of fixing everyone with top-down 'solutions'

self fulfilling spiraling nanny stateism.

Ah, the Benjamin Button syndrome. I had hoped that the minimal support provided by the state might see me out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You shouldn't know tbh. If you are well enough to go to work you shouldn't be wasting time and money on a test.
This. You don't test to see if you have any other Coronavirus so why test for this one of you don't have symptoms. More lives will be saved by getting back to normal and detecting cancer at stage 1 and not stage 4 for example.

The only health emergency we have now is one of our own making.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More infections = more close contacts right? 
Who is calling for an end to isolation for vaccinated people that's the alternative right? 
I think there will be a panic if essential staff are still working whilst Covid positive, but tbh I don't see anything wrong with it. If they are well why have them off?

My workplace has been properly found out for just how much it relied on people coming in unless they were too ill to physically make it, now that the decision is out of their hands and sick people have to stay off regardless
A few years ago I felt like death whilst at work with shifts on Christmas and new year included, if I’d sickied , someone who’s turn it was to have them off that year would have to have covered me. It honestly wouldn’t have been worth it to phone in.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...