Ad Lib Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 1 hour ago, The DA said: Every email system I've dealt with has sent a message along the lines of 'an email to you from xxxx with subject line yyyy has been quarantined. If you want to see this email, please contact your system admin'. Quite. It would be utterly astonishing if a system of this kind did not have that feature enabled as a matter of course. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolph Hucker Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 3 minutes ago, Yenitit said: Stop being a fanny and taking things so seriously on a football Internet forum. Long past time you, and a few others like you, did the same. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, eez-eh said: I’m reasonably techy but I’ve never heard that word being used in regards to an email. Unless it’s just a fancy name for a junk folder. No, it might be the term you don't recognise. It usually happens if there is an attachment. Edited April 25, 2020 by Sergeant Wilson 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 1 minute ago, eez-eh said: I’m reasonably techy but I’ve never heard that word being used in regards to an email. Unless it’s just a fancy name for a junk folder. It is more sophisticated than a Junk folder but really not much. Instead of your email provider simply automatically redirecting to junk, a third party app quarantines unusual or suspicious emails and then sends the intended recipient an email saying “do you want to block, release or permit this sender” or similar. It’s an additional line of defence against corporate organisations and the like inadvertently getting ravaged by a scam/virus etc. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 Every email system I've dealt with has sent a message along the lines of 'an email to you from xxxx with subject line yyyy has been quarantined. If you want to see this email, please contact your system admin'.I used to get this message as a daily digest, not every single time one got sent. I think it was at 8:30am every morning I'd get "3 emails have been quarantined, please contact...". 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 4 minutes ago, craigkillie said: I used to get this message as a daily digest, not every single time one got sent. I think it was at 8:30am every morning I'd get "3 emails have been quarantined, please contact...". Fair shout. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harry94 Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 It is more sophisticated than a Junk folder but really not much. Instead of your email provider simply automatically redirecting to junk, a third party app quarantines unusual or suspicious emails and then sends the intended recipient an email saying “do you want to block, release or permit this sender” or similar. It’s an additional line of defence against corporate organisations and the like inadvertently getting ravaged by a scam/virus etc.And an additional line of defence against read receipts. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunning1874 Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 32 minutes ago, Yenitit said: Stop being a fanny and taking things so seriously on a football Internet forum. Learn how to multi-quote and I'll consider it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyline Drifter Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 2 hours ago, The DA said: Every email system I've dealt with has sent a message along the lines of 'an email to you from xxxx with subject line yyyy has been quarantined. If you want to see this email, please contact your system admin'. 2 hours ago, eez-eh said: I’ve never in my life heard of “quarantining” in regards to an email. My work email server regularly intercepts suspicious mail and doesnt allow it through to my account. The next time I get a warning about it will be the first time. Usually end up having to check the server ourselves if we havent received something we know was sent. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyline Drifter Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 As for the spfl time line, I dont doubt its veracity but for me there are two o/s questions (desoite being pleased the vote passed). 1 - given it is now acknowledged the vote did reach the spfl as it was their server that held it, should it not count? 2 - is it allowed for Dundee to rescind a vote they dont deny casting because circumstances changed after they cast it? Maybe if a different vote is cast before the first arrives but the first then DID arrive befire they voted again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 5 minutes ago, Skyline Drifter said: As for the spfl time line, I dont doubt its veracity but for me there are two o/s questions (desoite being pleased the vote passed). 1 - given it is now acknowledged the vote did reach the spfl as it was their server that held it, should it not count? 2 - is it allowed for Dundee to rescind a vote they dont deny casting because circumstances changed after they cast it? Maybe if a different vote is cast before the first arrives but the first then DID arrive befire they voted again. Perfectly legal to rescind a 'no' vote within the 28 days. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyline Drifter Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 9 minutes ago, The DA said: Perfectly legal to rescind a 'no' vote within the 28 days. Mmm, I would query your use of "perfectly". Not being legally forbidden isnt quite the same thing. But yes, I accept they could just have remade the same proposal I guess and got it through if nobody else changed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee Bliss Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 1 hour ago, Dunning1874 said: Learn how to multi-quote and I'll consider it. No 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 As for the spfl time line, I dont doubt its veracity but for me there are two o/s questions (desoite being pleased the vote passed). 1 - given it is now acknowledged the vote did reach the spfl as it was their server that held it, should it not count? 2 - is it allowed for Dundee to rescind a vote they dont deny casting because circumstances changed after they cast it? Maybe if a different vote is cast before the first arrives but the first then DID arrive befire they voted again. As has been said many times regards point 2 - on a resolution a No vote (or an abstention) can be changed but not a Yes vote. As the deadline had not actually passed then those who has not voted in favour could still have done so until that deadline - not just Dundee but Rangers or any of the others who did not agree the proposal. Dundee's vote arriving late or otherwise is irrelevant as they had not cast a Yes vote. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 (edited) 40 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: As has been said many times regards point 2 - on a resolution a No vote (or an abstention) can be changed but not a Yes vote. As the deadline had not actually passed then those who has not voted in favour could still have done so until that deadline - not just Dundee but Rangers or any of the others who did not agree the proposal. Dundee's vote arriving late or otherwise is irrelevant as they had not cast a Yes vote. This isn’t actually clear. The implication of the Thistle QC’s argument was that if there were three simultaneous Championship ballots formally rejecting the proposal *at any time* the resolution is deemed to have fallen. You cannot then change your vote on a negatived resolution, but you can vote afresh on another proposed resolution that is the same in substance. Edited April 25, 2020 by Ad Lib 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 1 hour ago, The DA said: Perfectly legal to rescind a 'no' vote within the 28 days. Assuming that the proposed resolution was not formally rejected as soon as three Championship clubs had lodged “No” votes. Which isn’t clear. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harry94 Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 22 minutes ago, Ad Lib said: Assuming that the proposed resolution was not formally rejected as soon as three Championship clubs had lodged “No” votes. Which isn’t clear. If it was rejected, how hard would it have been for the SPFL to draw up the same vote a few hours later and repeat? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyline Drifter Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 1 minute ago, harry94 said: If it was rejected, how hard would it have been for the SPFL to draw up the same vote a few hours later and repeat? It wouldn't have been remotely hard but it would then give all the Yes votes also the opportunity to change their minds. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsforlife Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 Just now, harry94 said: If it was rejected, how hard would it have been for the SPFL to draw up the same vote a few hours later and repeat? Probably not very difficult. But it would have been clearer. had the resolution been accepted as failed on Friday night(even if the same ‘what email’ shit went on) Proper procedure would have been the spfl to state the vote had failed narrowly but they had since been contacted by a club who have indicated they are now willing to support the resolution. Therefore a further vote will be had with clubs asked to submit votes by 5pm Monday. We’d have got to the same place but it would have been far better handled. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted April 25, 2020 Share Posted April 25, 2020 39 minutes ago, harry94 said: If it was rejected, how hard would it have been for the SPFL to draw up the same vote a few hours later and repeat? Possibly very easily. But it would then be subject to a fresh 28 day deadline and those who had previously voted Yes would have been free not to vote for it second time round. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.