PossilYM Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 56 minutes ago, Shanner said: It will be Beith. You probably want to make your peace with this now to save it annoying you later. If a club with no licence wins it then so be it. The Blazers will be laughed out the pyramid. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stag Nation Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 24 minutes ago, PossilYM said: If a club with no licence wins it then so be it. The Blazers will be laughed out the pyramid. o you mean the Blazers at Beith, for failing to get licensed, or those at Darvel, Talbot, Clydebank etc. for letting them win? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 Just now, Stag Nation said: o you mean the Blazers at Beith, for failing to get licensed, or those at Darvel, Talbot, Clydebank etc. for letting them win? I can only assume you did not read the well-publicised story about the issues which have prevented Beith from applying for a license. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 2 hours ago, craigkillie said: I can only assume you did not read the well-publicised story about the issues which have prevented Beith from applying for a license. Stop spoiling the wee boys' fun! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josuke Higashikata Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 (edited) In what must have been a particularly hard defeat for Clydebank, I must thank the home team. They were most magnanimous in defeat and praise Largs for our performance. And the cupcakes from Clydebank Women were delicious. No complaints about refereeing is always a plus. Edited February 25 by Josuke Higashikata 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glensmad Posted February 25 Author Share Posted February 25 (edited) Ok, @PossilYM, I'll endulge (for probably the 5th time now). I've asked you this question at least four times already, and on each occasion you have disappeared, not answered the question, waited a few weeks and then come back and trotted out the same line again. Then, when asked the same question, the same cycle repeats. So, for the sake of your credibility, please answer this question :- Why would it be embarrassing for the WoSFL Board if a non-licensed team wins the league again this season, given that the Scottish FA suspended new licensing applications last year and won't lift the suspension until after this summer's AGM ? Edited February 25 by glensmad 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dav nan Gael Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 Broxburn looking more and more LL bound without too much fuss ....... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossilYM Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 16 minutes ago, glensmad said: Ok, @PossilYM, I'll endulge (for probably the 5th time now). I've asked you this question at least four times already, and on each occasion you have disappeared, not answered the question, waited a few weeks and then come back and trotted out the same line again. Then, when asked the same question, the same cycle repeats. So, for the sake of your credibility, please answer this question :- Why would it be embarrassing for the WoSFL Board if a non-licensed team wins the league again this season, given that the Scottish FA suspended new licensing applications last year and won't lift the suspension until after this summer's AGM ? I hope I'm wrong here but at what point do the Blazers past and present except they made a hash of negotiations regarding setting up the Wosfl? Did nobody think of asking what happens if the Wosfl winners were unlicensed? If and again i hope this isn't the case, the Wosfl goes to three in a row failing to get our Champions into the Lowland League? 5 times I've now asked and not one Blazer can answer and put their hands up that they or those previous made a complete hash of negotiations in joining the pyramid. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 1 minute ago, PossilYM said: I hope I'm wrong here but at what point do the Blazers past and present except they made a hash of negotiations regarding setting up the Wosfl? Did nobody think of asking what happens if the Wosfl winners were unlicensed? If and again i hope this isn't the case, the Wosfl goes to three in a row failing to get our Champions into the Lowland League? 5 times I've now asked and not one Blazer can answer and put their hands up that they or those previous made a complete hash of negotiations in joining the pyramid. But you know what happens. Why does a League official need to tell you? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thejackdaw Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 32 minutes ago, glensmad said: Ok, @PossilYM, I'll endulge (for probably the 5th time now). I've asked you this question at least four times already, and on each occasion you have disappeared, not answered the question, waited a few weeks and then come back and trotted out the same line again. Then, when asked the same question, the same cycle repeats. So, for the sake of your credibility, please answer this question :- Why would it be embarrassing for the WoSFL Board if a non-licensed team wins the league again this season, given that the Scottish FA suspended new licensing applications last year and won't lift the suspension until after this summer's AGM ? Can you enlighten me at all regarding why progressive clubs who are trying their upmost best to become licensed are hitting a brick wall? Why the suspension until after this summers agm ? Shouldn't proactive clubs be encouraged to gain their licence as opposed to hitting the proverbial Brick wall ? Is this encouraging progress or building big barriers? I'm only a fan of My club and my words don't represent anyone other than myself . 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glensmad Posted February 25 Author Share Posted February 25 18 minutes ago, Thejackdaw said: Can you enlighten me at all regarding why progressive clubs who are trying their upmost best to become licensed are hitting a brick wall? Why the suspension until after this summers agm ? Shouldn't proactive clubs be encouraged to gain their licence as opposed to hitting the proverbial Brick wall ? Is this encouraging progress or building big barriers? I'm only a fan of My club and my words don't represent anyone other than myself . You'd need to ask the Scottish FA to answer that one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 38 minutes ago, Dav nan Gael said: Broxburn looking more and more LL bound without too much fuss ....... It would be a right lol if you lost to the SoSL winners. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glensmad Posted February 25 Author Share Posted February 25 23 minutes ago, PossilYM said: I hope I'm wrong here but at what point do the Blazers past and present except they made a hash of negotiations regarding setting up the Wosfl? Did nobody think of asking what happens if the Wosfl winners were unlicensed? If and again i hope this isn't the case, the Wosfl goes to three in a row failing to get our Champions into the Lowland League? 5 times I've now asked and not one Blazer can answer and put their hands up that they or those previous made a complete hash of negotiations in joining the pyramid. Ok, so finally you've been brave enough to respond, well done. I assume you are aware that the pyramid existed before the WoSFL did, and the Lowland League had an agreement with the EoSFL and the SoSFL prior to the WoSFL asking to be part of that. For that agreement to change, it required the agreement of all three existing parties, and the Scottish FA. Part of that agreement was that only champion clubs who are licensed can be promoted to the LL. The WoSFL had to agree to those terms, otherwise the Scottish FA would not have sanctioned the WoSFL's entry to the pyramid. It's as simple as that. It may change in the future if all five parties agree to change it, but I don't see that happening any time soon. I hope that gives you some clarity. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanner Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 Did Beith ever find out who owns their park or whatever it was that was holding up their application before? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BANKIEBILL Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 1 hour ago, Josuke Higashikata said: In what must have been a particularly hard defeat for Clydebank, I must thank the home team. They were most magnanimous in defeat and praise Largs for our performance. And the cupcakes from Clydebank Women were delicious. No complaints about refereeing is always a plus. Largs did a right number on us. Perfect game plan. Well deserved. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 2 minutes ago, glensmad said: Ok, so finally you've been brave enough to respond, well done. I assume you are aware that the pyramid existed before the WoSFL did, and the Lowland League had an agreement with the EoSFL and the SoSFL prior to the WoSFL asking to be part of that. For that agreement to change, it required the agreement of all three existing parties, and the Scottish FA. Part of that agreement was that only champion clubs who are licensed can be promoted to the LL. The WoSFL had to agree to those terms, otherwise the Scottish FA would not have sanctioned the WoSFL's entry to the pyramid. It's as simple as that. It may change in the future if all five parties agree to change it, but I don't see that happening any time soon. I hope that gives you some clarity. No need for it to change. Fine as it is. Nothing to see here, 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairWeatherFan Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 33 minutes ago, PossilYM said: I hope I'm wrong here but at what point do the Blazers past and present except they made a hash of negotiations regarding setting up the Wosfl? Not much to negotiate. The West Region had failed to enter the pyramid through the SJFA. Those putting together the WoSFL didn't have much to do except accept what was on offer. Otherwise clubs would be left with the SoSFL/EoSFL application option. 33 minutes ago, PossilYM said: Did nobody think of asking what happens if the Wosfl winners were unlicensed? Everyone was well aware it would have to be a licensed champion to gain entry the LL Play-off. Why should another league's champion compete against a lower ranked team. 33 minutes ago, PossilYM said: If and again i hope this isn't the case, the Wosfl goes to three in a row failing to get our Champions into the Lowland League? There's no promotion for the WoS Premier champion. Try again next season. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 1 hour ago, Shanner said: Did Beith ever find out who owns their park or whatever it was that was holding up their application before? I'm sure I read that they had a planning application in for floodlights. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanner Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 8 minutes ago, craigkillie said: I'm sure I read that they had a planning application in for floodlights. Cool. that was tinpot stuff. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
not man of the match Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 7 hours ago, Josuke Higashikata said: In what must have been a particularly hard defeat for Clydebank, I must thank the home team. They were most magnanimous in defeat and praise Largs for our performance. And the cupcakes from Clydebank Women were delicious. No complaints about refereeing is always a plus. Better team won and I thought the referee let the game flow and didn’t give into any of the soft nonsense foul claims throughout the game. Cakes were top notch too! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.