Jump to content

Sarah Everard


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, JustOneCornetto said:

I saw the press conference and agree it was a real mess but didn't know about the further statement re alcohol issues. Just waiting for update on ITV news to see who said what and how it was said.

To quote the Police...

"The mad alkie fell in".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a real shame it came to that, but again you’ve got politicians, celebrities, knuckle draggers, ‘experts’ chiming in, undermining confidence, abusing the family etc, the force obviously felt that they had to provide this information to respond to the massive misinformation tidal wave. 

Missing person investigations are split into 3 categories of risk, high, medium and low. High risk suggests that the individual is extremely vulnerable and likely to come to harm, to put this in perspective, someone who’s through medical problem (ie needs regular medication, care, is very frail/dementia), vulnerable (perhaps ASN, age, psychological illness, suicidal ideation history or a stated aim of suicide) or at risk of harm from other persons or a risk to the public. Id say she was quite rightly graded high risk from the offset given the history. Alcohol abuse in isolation isnt an immediate high risk though, but the psychological distress etc would put her there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ICTChris said:

No doubt the police have ballsed up the PR but it's a fairly difficult situation.  Don't say anything and people/the media get antsy and start speculating and pouring stuff onto social media that could impact the investigation.  But saying the truth - she had a drinking problem, had previous police involvement (ie suicide attempt or ideation) and disappeared next to a body of flowing water is a undignified and will be hurtful to the family, exposing the most private things about her to an audience of millions.

 

 

Its not like the police and associated PR professionals have never been in a situation like this before. Its a monumental f**k up from day 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ICTChris said:

Fuk me. The fact he thought he had to get involved is mind boggling in itself but the fact a national "newspaper" feels the need to run with that story given what had happened in the proceeding hours is staggering.  Broken Britain in microcosm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, scottsdad said:

Needless to say, the diving expert has been giving his thoughts to the news. 

He now reckons she either walked off or a third party was involved. 

That was his take on it last week, reading between the lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ICTChris said:

Maybe just trying to give his career a lift.

He knows about these things.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ICTChris said:

The dad-of-four suggests 'slip marks or footmarks' would be evident on the ground had Nicola fallen in the river in St Michael's on Wyre in Lancashire, but also muses how 'there would be signs of a struggle' if someone had taken the missing mum-of-two.

Obviously missed his vocation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...