superbigal Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 Are baldy, specky fat c***s protected from abuse 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTG Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 Just for the sake of clarity, I'd lmfao if Rowling got lifted. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheese Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 Why does Scotland have to be the front line of the increasingly silly culture war ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inanimate Carbon Rod Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 48 minutes ago, Peil said: If it's being recorded and kept on file, surely it'll show up in an enhanced disclosure? If not I've misunderstood If you’ve been a suspect in a crime and its proven that you’ve not committed a crime or been subject of a malicious complaint then the crime report is marked ‘no crime’ and it would not negatively impact a disclosure check. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venti Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 38 minutes ago, HTG said: Just for the sake of clarity, I'd lmfao if Rowling got lifted. Off to Azkaban. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MazzyStar Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 Everyone engaged in this whole debate is a reactionary. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Waldo Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 6 hours ago, Peil said: So, theoretically, you could fling a complaint in about someone, with no substance, the police investigate, NFA, but you now have it show up on a disclosure check. Unless something has changed, all Non Crime Hate Incidents are recorded on the Police Scotland Vulnerable Persons Database, which retains information in relation to a range of concerns including a detailed ‘synopsis of the incident and all known nominals’. This information may be subject to disclosure under an enhanced criminal records check. Police Scotland also share information about people on the VPD with other public bodies such as council social work and education departments, the Crown Office and Prosecution Service, and the Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peil Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Mr Waldo said: Unless something has changed, all Non Crime Hate Incidents are recorded on the Police Scotland Vulnerable Persons Database, which retains information in relation to a range of concerns including a detailed ‘synopsis of the incident and all known nominals’. This information may be subject to disclosure under an enhanced criminal records check. Police Scotland also share information about people on the VPD with other public bodies such as council social work and education departments, the Crown Office and Prosecution Service, and the Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration So, it's possible that it may impact someone, even if the complaint is dismissed? My understanding is that the details are revealed and it's the department/whoever to make a decision based on that report. Doesn't that mean you could have someone negatively impacted by social work or whatever assuming you're racist/transphobic etc. and they'd rather not risk placing a child with you as a foster carer ( for example) Edited April 1 by Peil 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyg83 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 1 hour ago, alta-pete said: Pointless piece of legislation that provides a suitably shiny distraction from the myriad other issues that this country’s elected should be focusing on. And we’re falling for it. I would totally agree with this. It's not going to be enforceable and defies any sort of common sense. It's all about them looking "progressive". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyg83 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 27 minutes ago, MazzyStar said: Everyone engaged in this whole debate is a reactionary. Nah, that's unfair. It's definitely worth bothering about as the "debate" is being shut down. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyg83 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 1 hour ago, HTG said: Just for the sake of clarity, I'd lmfao if Rowling got lifted. would be hilarious actually. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theyellowbox Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 2 hours ago, Binos said: The Scottish Parliament is a project in having power, whilst not actually having any power And watching the total pish they therefore occupy their time coming up with Bino's is showing he has completely missed the point whilst not actually having a clue what he is talking about. The whole debate is around the Scottish Parliament passing legislation. If that is not having power then you completely misunderstand the whole point. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theyellowbox Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 2 hours ago, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said: Murdo Fraser should be on a list. Just not one of folk that has ever actually won an election. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alta-pete Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 1 hour ago, Venti said: Off to Azkaban. Or worse, Peterhead. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MazzyStar Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 (edited) 1 hour ago, andyg83 said: Nah, that's unfair. It's definitely worth bothering about as the "debate" is being shut down. I think the culture wars in general are very reactionary and this legislation has been turned into another tiresome part of the culture wars. Edited April 1 by MazzyStar 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alta-pete Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 6 minutes ago, Theyellowbox said: Bino's is showing he has completely missed the point whilst not actually having a clue what he is talking about. The whole debate is around the Scottish Parliament passing legislation. If that is not having power then you completely misunderstand the whole point. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alta-pete Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 2 hours ago, superbigal said: Are baldy, specky fat c***s protected from abuse I fucking hope so! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 2 minutes ago, alta-pete said: I fucking hope so! ^^^^^ Big boned, myopic with alopecia. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 3 minutes ago, Zen Archer (Raconteur) said: ^^^^^ Big boned, myopic with alopecia. Reported. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.